Argument for and Against the British Monarchy

In: Historical Events

Submitted By plunkseth
Words 3077
Pages 13
Contents

1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3
2. Definition………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4
3. History…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4
4. Analysis of Current Situation……………………………………………….……………………………………. 5
5. Evaluation of Strengths and Weaknesses………………………………………………………………....... 6 A. Strengths……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...... 6 I. Representing the Nation at Home and Abroad………………………........................................... 6 II. Neutral and Worthwhile Political Role………………………………............................................... 7 III. Uniting and Stabilizing the Nationality……………...……………….............................................. 7 B. Weaknesses…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 I. An Obsolete and Non-democratic Institution………...……………………………………………... 8 II. Obstructing the Future Development of the Britain…….………………………………………. 8 III. Expensive……………………………………………...…………………………………………………………. 9
6. Comparison to American Head of State…………………………………………………………………… 11
7. Recommendation……………………………………………..……………………………………………………. 11
8. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 12
9. References……………………………………………..……………………………………………………………… 14

1. Introduction
Monarchy was the primary government form for a majority of European countries before 1914 (Bogdanor, 1995). However, in modern Europe, few countries retain the monarchies. The United Kingdom, as one of the most developed countries, still maintains the position of monarch as the head of state. Today’s British monarchy, which is also called a Constitutional Monarchy, is quite different from the past ‘absolute monarchy’. “The monarchical shell remains intact, but the inner workings have been taken over by party political leaders,” says Norton (2007). In the past, the monarch…...

Similar Documents

Argument Against Wearing School Uniforms

...Argument Against Wearing School Uniforms Theirs is an ongoing discussion in the nation about school uniforms, whether or not they help with behavior problems and scores (“An Argument Against School Uniforms”). Kade A., A sixth grade student, when asked about school uniforms she said, “no, I don’t like them because they are uncomfortable and makes her and maybe the people around feel like their wearing church clothes all the time” (“An Argument Against School Uniforms”). “Clothes are a sources of expression for children, an as kids get older they become increasingly resentful of uniforms. By instituting a uniform policy, schools are taking away kids individuality. Schools need to decide if that sacrifice is worth making” (“An Argument Against School Uniforms”). “School Uniform use was not significantly correlated with any of the school commitment variables such as behavior, or substance use of (drugs). In addition, students wearing uniforms did not appear to have any significantly different academic preparedness, proschool attitudes, or peer group structures with proschool attitudes other than students” (“An Argument Against School Uniforms”). Middle School/Junior High is a time of maturing, physically, mentally, academically and emotionally. Schools need to create an environment that encourages students individuality and motivate them to challenge themselves and inspire self confidence. Some people feel that school uniforms diminish creativity and self expression (“An......

Words: 1124 - Pages: 5

Argument Against Wearing School Uniforms

...Argument Against Wearing School Uniforms Theirs is an ongoing discussion in the nation about school uniforms, whether or not they help with behavior problems and scores (“An Argument Against School Uniforms”). Kade A., A sixth grade student, when asked about school uniforms she said, “no, I don’t like them because they are uncomfortable and makes her and maybe the people around feel like their wearing church clothes all the time” (“An Argument Against School Uniforms”). “Clothes are a sources of expression for children, an as kids get older they become increasingly resentful of uniforms. By instituting a uniform policy, schools are taking away kids individuality. Schools need to decide if that sacrifice is worth making” (“An Argument Against School Uniforms”). “School Uniform use was not significantly correlated with any of the school commitment variables such as behavior, or substance use of (drugs). In addition, students wearing uniforms did not appear to have any significantly different academic preparedness, proschool attitudes, or peer group structures with proschool attitudes other than students” (“An Argument Against School Uniforms”). Middle School/Junior High is a time of maturing, physically, mentally, academically and emotionally. Schools need to create an environment that encourages students individuality and motivate them to challenge themselves and inspire self confidence. Some people feel that school uniforms diminish creativity and self expression (“An...

Words: 293 - Pages: 2

Arguments for & Against the Usage of the “N” Word

...Arguments for & Against the Usage of the “N” Word When discussing the definition, effects, and the history behind the “N” word, it is interesting how this word has managed to change over time from having a descriptive meaning, to a negative connotation, and to a positive controversial meaning. That is why there are those who believe that the “N” word should and should not be used, and there are those that believe that only some (or the accepted ones) should use it in order to avoid conflicts. This essay will go over some of the argument against and in favor of the usage of the “N” word. Starting with arguments against, the older black gentlemen in the first couple of videos believe that using the word is reverting back into history (slavery, discrimination, and segregation) from an offensive use. In other words, why would you want to use the “N” word, when it was used to refer to blacks in a derogatory sense? Shouldn’t it be viewed offensively? It is understandable from their point of view because they actually lived and felt what it was like to be referred to with the “N” word, when the “N” word had a very derogatory and negative connotation. There are those, a black male and female from Stanford University, who believe that it can be used, but it should not be used so frequently in rap music. In other words, is kind of like using “S!@#T and B!@#H” all the time; is not about the meaning of the word in itself anymore, but the frequent usage of profanity in their lyrics.......

Words: 918 - Pages: 4

For and Against Arguments Animal Testing

...Against: * 1) Animal testing is not the same as human testing : Animal testing and human testing have different effects and results. The reaction of a drug in an animal’s body is quite different from the reaction in a human. * 2) Drug testing on animals causes stress, pain and sometimes death: Animal testing is cruel and sometimes it doesn’t even work. Some of the animals are not even properly anesthetized so, they feel sharp pains and usually die. One example of animal testing is called the Draize test in which the product tested is placed in the animal’s eyes resulting in blindness and death. Another example of animal testing is the LD50 in which huge amounts of a product are put into the animals’ stomachs until they die. In this process they suffer from vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis, convulsion and internal bleeding. * 3) Animal testing is morally wrong: Besides producing suffering and pain, animals being tested generate high levels of depression because of being inside of small cages. It’s a proven fact that most scientists that do animal testing feel guilt and sorrow although they should not become emotionally connected with the animals. * 4) Animal testing is very expensive: Animal testing costs over $136 billion dollars annually for the American public. Animals must be fed, housed, cared and treated with drugs. The tests are very expensive and they may be practiced more than once in short periods of time. * 5) There are many alternatives...

Words: 662 - Pages: 3

Argument Against Free Trade

...and use them to specify when the GATT0WTO should promote trade+ We then describe our statistical model and data and present the empirical findings+ We conclude by suggesting how attention to standing and embeddedness could advance our understanding of other international agreements+ Standing: Rights and Obligations in International Organizations How should one study the effects of an international institution? The most obvious approach would be to compare relations between members to relations between nonmembers, but this approach would miss potentially important dimensions of cooperation+ Agreements can impose externalities on relations between members and nonmembers, or even on relations between pairs of nonmembers+ We develop this argument by invoking the concept of institutional standing, which captures the degree to which a country, territory, or nongovernmental actor has rights and obligations arising from the institution+ Standing differs from formal membership in two ways+ First, some institutions give rights and obligations not only to formal members, but also to territories and groups that never signed the agreement+ These nonmember participants have standing, and consequently the institution should influence their behavior+ Second, even formal members do not necessarily accept all parts of an agreement as binding on themselves+ Some employ opt-out clauses or express reservations that affect the distribution of rights and obligations+ Given that nonmembers’......

Words: 13582 - Pages: 55

Arguments for & Against Congress

...problems with lawmaking that most people see is the time involved in getting a law passed. In order for a bill to become a law it must first be "introduced to the House or Senate, or both, then referred to a committee." (Cummings / Wise 479). This can be a very time consuming process. Anyone interested in having a law passed must realize the process involved and be patient. In addition to lawmaking Congress is also involved in passing amendments. Our nation has been able to grow and strengthen due to the amendment process. In order for our government to keep up with the changing times it is crucial that we make adjustments to the constitution. The downfall is that the amendments passed have not always kept up with changing times. Arguments against Congress would be that they taken to long in enforcing the amendments. The U.S. Congress must also implement national policy. The Congress must regulate commerce in order to create a prosperous economy. It is up to Congress to monitor the growth of the economy and be ready to act if necessary. Congress has the power to implement monetary policy in which they decrease taxes to induce spending during a slow economic period. They can also increase taxes if there is a threat of inflation. The problems with the role of Congress in the economy is again the time factor. It takes time to get the policy going so Congress must be able to detect future economic problems in order for it to be effective. Congress makes up......

Words: 1762 - Pages: 8

Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty

...Arguments FOR and AGAINST the death penalty The death penalty has been used since ancient times in almost every culture. Today it will still executed in some states like the USA, China, or in Islam Countries. I would like to talk about the Arguments for and against the death penalty. There are many justifications going around for capital punishment. Deterrence is the most common used argument for the death penalty. Many states believe that it is necessary to kill a prisoner to disadvise other people from committing the same kind of crime. Some people who commit violence are highly unstable or mentally ill. Murders are most committed in moments of passion, when extreme emotions overcomes himself or under the influence of drugs. In none of these cases can fear of the death penalty be expected to deter. Sometimes maybe a murderer or a rapist has a bad conscience due to his act. However, he can‘t make it undone. If he has a life-long sentence, he will always suffers for his felony. He must live with that and will never have the chance to apologise. In my opinion this punishment is a better way and in many cases it‘s much more striking. Of course many people think there are some lawsuit which are so brutal or horrifying that the murderer „must“ be killed, because it‘s not fair that he has any rights to live. The problem is, that often the murderer wants to be executed, because of his actions. So is it then punishment or deliverance for him? The protection......

Words: 630 - Pages: 3

Arguments for and Against Diversification

...ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST DIVERSIFICATION AS A STRATEGY. Diversification is the act of introducing variety into an existing business; it is an addition of valued products in relation to organizations productivity. Diversification involves a lot of responsibility; it is not a thing that should be done in a rush. When it is successful, it gives great competitive advantage and a substantial growth but if it fails it could lead to very grave consequences. It is used to defuse the risk of losing out totally if one business performs better than the other. Arguments in favour of diversification is that, * It makes it simpler for a business to protect its capital when it is assigning funds to other investments. * It lowers the risk of putting all the eggs in one basket * It provides the human resource department the chance to improve and also attract efficient professionals. * It safeguards against financial failure if the market becomes dormant. * It also helps in managing risk and lowers the instability of an asset price change. Unfortunately, it does not depend on how diversified an organization is, risk cannot be totally removed. When an organisation diversifies, the risk is traded for either a market risk or an economic risk and it depends on the organizations portfolio, it also decides on how much of equity that will be unprotected to each type of risk that may surface. Although diversification reduces the exposure of a certain risk, it also reduces......

Words: 518 - Pages: 3

Argument Against the Legalisation of Voluntary

...Argument Against the Legalisation of Voluntary Euthanasia – Roman Catholic View Voluntary Euthanasia is against the law in the UK for a reason. It is seen as a form of murder or manslaughter, it is morally wrong and anyone can see that. Voluntary Euthanasia is murder when you commit murder you are weakening the sanctity of life. Every human being is the creation of god and that means that they are limits to the things we do in life. If you kill yourself, or get someone to do it for you are saying that God does not have a right over our lives because he created us therefore it is his right to decide the length of our lives and the way our lives end. Job 1:21 says “God gives and God takes away.” Voluntary Euthanasia should not be legalised because it is not what God would have wanted and we should obey this as we would not be here if it was not for God. Exodus 20:13 says “you shall not commit murder” It is wrong to take away the sacred gift of human life, killing is always wrong. The Roman Catholic Church believes that there are other ways of dying in peace instead of voluntary euthanasia. They understand that dying can be a frightening and a hard time for a lot of people but there are better alternatives to euthanasia; this is where the hospice movement is introduced. If the patient chooses palliative care instead of euthanasia then the hospice can provide a peaceful death for them. They will give them all the facilities and emotional facilities that are needed to......

Words: 712 - Pages: 3

States’ Arguments Against a Central Government

...internal affairs. Consequently, heated debates and uprisings characterize this period, which started with the framing of Articles in 1777 and ended with the final adoption of the United States constitution in 1787. STATES’ ARGUMENTS AGAINST A CENTRAL GOVERNMENT American leaders faced much opposition from the states after the American Revolution as a result of deciding to form a central government. The states feared that such a government would suppress them and would interfere with their internal affairs. Consequently, heated debates and uprisings characterize this period, which started with the framing of Articles in 1777 and ended with the final adoption of the United States constitution in 1787. The American Revolution holds a very prominent place in the history of this country, as it was the longest and the most painful war Americans ever encountered. It took many years and numerous conflicts to finally gain independence in 1776 from British domination, which had been subjugating its colonies with laws of an unwritten constitution. It must be understood that though Americans were fighting for the right of democracy and each state wanted self-government, later that same issue turned into a big problem. Soon after America became independent, the former British colonies decided to form their own governments. It was then that the real battle began. The task of forming separate constitutions for each state, along with the formation of governmental institutions, turned......

Words: 1120 - Pages: 5

Arguments Against Marxism

...Arguments Against Marxism Melissa Criminology Abstract The German philosopher Karl Marx provided the world with a new and different way to think about the social and economic systems. This new social philosophy was called communism and Marx’s theory on communism is referred to as Marxism. Karl Marx’s concepts of Marxism are detailed in his book “Communist Manifesto” which was published in 1848. His book discussed the issue of social structure and the problems of a capitalist society. From the time Karl Marx first presented his ideas on communism, there have been many objections from philosophers and political scientists who have argued that the idea of communism in the modern western world would not work and is not a valid social structure. Arguments Against Marxism Marxism is a sociological and economic worldview that Karl Marx and Fredric Engles developed. One aspect of Marxism is a belief that throughout human history there has always been a defined level of social class. As a consequence of this, there has always been a struggle between the different levels of social class and the exploitation of lower class people. According to Marx, the class structure has existed throughout recent human society and is continuing to prevail throughout history (Walsh 2012). A second aspect of Marxism is the belief that a capitalist system does not work in present day society. In a capitalist society, only a small percentage of the population holds means and the ownership......

Words: 1008 - Pages: 5

An Argument Against Abortion

...you stand for the sanctity of marriage, could be met with affirmative action from professed homosexuals. These laws are not a mere instrumental change, but a radical change that mobilizes an entire social justice, which promotes and advances a certain way of life a. We need to be aware that What is actually at stake is how our society looks upon something) and the view that we have is a part of the common good, and it involves immediate and manifold consequences. For Example, Parents who teach their children one thing about sexuality and the family will find that state-funds are used and regulations established directly in opposition to them in government schools. Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation will be warned against from an early age. With this, Children who may be conceived in marital acts are understood, not as ends, which are outside the marriage but rather as gifts which supervene on acts whose central justifying point is marital unity. When we look at Children they are best understood not as property of the parent, but as persons in themselves. Our culture’s grasp of this truth is connected to a basic understanding of what is the reality of both sex and marriage. Because of the truth of these acts and their effect on each other that we have established early it is clear that Homosexual adoption reduces children to an end, a property, or object that should not be sanctioned by the state...

Words: 523 - Pages: 3

The Arguments for and Against the Inerrancy of the Bible

...The Arguments For And Against The Inerrancy of The Bible D’Angela Carr Liberty University Professor Long Theology 201 The Arguments For And Against The Inerrancy of The Bible The Bible is a collection of writings which consist of sixty six books. These books are divided into two parts, the Old Testament and the New Testament. Testament refers to the covenant between God and his people. 39 of the books are the Old Testament and 27 of them are the New Testament. The Bible also has multiple authors that composed their writings in different time frames. It took over 1500 hundred years to put the final writings together to compose what we know as the finished Bible. The Bible is one of the oldest religious text that date back over 3000 years ago. Around 1450 BC Moses authored the first five books of the Bible, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Leviticus. These first five books are called the Torah or Pentateuch. Around 95 AD, John authored Revelation which is the last book of the Bible. Approximately 1,545 years passed between the first writings and the last. The validity or inerrancy of the Bible is expressed by its ability to withstand the test of time, hold up to extreme scrutiny and ability to predict the future. Test of time Unlike other books or authoritative texts the Bible has multiple authors that wrote in different eras but maintained a continuous theme. Moses and Isaiah both prophesied the coming of the Messiah and were both dead......

Words: 750 - Pages: 3

Argument Against Gmos

...first 7 months of pregnancy. For 93% of fetuses to have toxins in them very unfortunate because it will cause them many problems later on in life. Second, if there is solid proof that genetically modified soy is causing harm to animals, more than likely it will have the same effects in humans, especially children who don’t have fully developed immune and digestive systems. According to Ferrie, California is about to ban GM fish products, after a long battle to even have it be labelled, and because of this, “Monsanto’s shares fell after” this news reached the public (Ferrie 2). In “Canada and U.S. still support GM Foods, despite ill-effects” by Helke Ferrie, she states that “The American Academy of Environmental Medicine has formally warned against GMO consumption” (Ferrie 3), yet with it in “60% of all processed foods” (Ferrie 3) that is becoming virtually impossible. We are not only pumping our fellow humans full of GMOs, but we have gotten to the point that we are pumping our chickens, cows and pigs full of them as well to make them grow bigger faster. “About 70% of conventionally raised broiler chickens are loaded with antibiotics…’ (Ferrie 3) and “rats fed biotech food became like ADHD kids” (Ferrie 3). By consuming all of these GM foods and antibiotic and hormone loaded animals, we are putting these toxins in our body. Unfortunately our bodies can only filter out so much of what we put into it before it gets tired. When our bodies can no longer expel the toxins, it sits......

Words: 1879 - Pages: 8

Argument Against God

...Kenneth Ferrante Philosophy-Imparato December 11, 2013 Writing Assignment Argument Against God For the concept I chose Nagel’s argument against god. Nagel claims that because evil exists it indicates that God must not exist. Premise one states that God is all knowing, all-powerful, and all good. This portrays God as a being that could see, oppose, and destroy Evil with ease, but that isn’t the case, Evil is still in existence. Premise two expands off the claim that God is all-powerful, meaning that God could eliminate all Evil, but he hasn’t. Premise three demonstrates the claim that God is all knowing; therefore he is aware of all Evil. Premise four explains how God is all good meaning that He opposes all things Evil. Premise five claims that Evil is still found throughout God’s world. Thus supporting the conclusion that God cannot exist if Evil is still in existence, which it is. In my opinion, I find Nagel’s argument to be extremely compelling and one hundred percent possible. The idea that God is a being whole is all knowing, all-powerful, and all good suggests that he would create the best possible world. There are various examples that I found to be effective but the idea of a hole in a t-shirt, I found to be simplest and most understandable that demonstrates the inability for God to exist. Although this might be true and God may not exist I have a different outlook. If Evil did not exist what purpose would God serve? He is the protector of Evil and justifies......

Words: 803 - Pages: 4