Submitted By mtk767

Words 1099

Pages 5

Words 1099

Pages 5

|Assignment front sheet |

|Qualification |Unit number and title |

|BTEC |11: Systems Analysis and Design |

|Learner name | Assessor name |

| |Bilal Sarwar |

|Date issued | Hand in deadline |Submitted on |

|16/10/2015 |06/11/2015 | |

| | |

|Assignment title |FMZ Consultancy: Assignment 1 |

|In this assessment you will have opportunities to provide evidence against the following criteria. |

|Indicate the page numbers where the evidence can be found. |

|Criteria |To achieve the criteria the evidence must show that the learner is able to: | |Task no. | |Evidence |

|reference |…...

...areas in equal times. PROOF OF LAW 2 CONTINUED… Insert (4) into (14) (17) (17) is simplified when t=0 (18) PROOF OF LAW 2 CONTINUED… C is always constant so (17)=(18) (19) Differential area equation for polar coordinates Differential area equation is half of the constant function. (20) PROOF OF LAW 2 CONTINUED… LAW 2 is PROVED!!!! KEPLER’S LAWS OF PLANETARY MOTION 1. Planets move around the Sun in ellipses, with the Sun at one focus. 2. The line connecting the Sun to a planet sweeps equal areas in equal times. 3. The square of the orbital period of a planet is proportional to the cube of the semimajor axis of the ellipse. TERMINOLOGY OF LAW 3 Semi-Major Axis a Semi-Minor Axis b Major Axis Minor Axis a=semi-major axis b=semi-minor axis T=period WHAT DOES LAW 3 MEAN? The square of the orbital period of a planet is proportional to the cube of the semimajor axis of the ellipse. PROOF OF LAW 3 There is a concept from the proof of Law 1 that is needed…Eccentricity Two formulas (31) and (32) (32) (31) PROOF OF LAW 3 CONTINUED… Kepler’s law says (33) Formula 1 for area Formula 2 uses (20) PROOF OF LAW 3 CONTINUED… Combining Formula 1 and 2 and solving for T (34) rmax is equal to (31) when θ=π PROOF OF LAW 3 CONTINUED… a is found using the maximum position vector (35) PROOF OF LAW 3 CONTINUED… a can be found from (35) PROOF OF LAW 3......

Words: 787 - Pages: 4

...Best Answer Answer Quite simply, criminal law deals with violations of statutory crime and its punishment, civil law deals with non-criminal things such as contracts/business, and things such as divorce, etc. You can be charged under both criminal and civil proceedings though. A perfect example is OJ Simpson being aquitted of criminal charges but being found guilty in civil proceedings. Probably the biggest difference between the two is what is called "BURDEN OF PROOF" In criminal proceedings the burden is "BEYOND ALL REASONABLE DOUBT" for someone to be convicted. This means that the evidence points substantially towards guilt and there is little to no question of guilt. For a jury in this case you would need everyone in agreement or the case is a mistrial. Unaminity is the key. In civil proceedings all that is required is "preponderance of evidence" which means that if it is found that it was more likely than not that an incident occured then you can be convicted. This kind of proceeding is really a "who has the best evidence" type of case. Only a majority of jury members decision is needed in this case. ANSWER 2 1. Criminal Law cases must prove the person's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, whilst civil cases must be proved on the balance of probability 2. The main difference however is who the law is aimed at. Theoretically criminal law is a considered to be harming all members of society. Consequently, the victim of the criminal case is all of......

Words: 520 - Pages: 3

...Why is? Consider a population of size N with the following elements: . Now suppose we perform a random sampling of size n of the population. The total number of unique samples that can be drawn is, where To simplify the notation, we’ll letbe equal to. Now sincerepresents the total number of unique samples that can be drawn, we know that there will bedifferent sample means, . Therefore the mean of the sample mean will simply be We don’t know the exact shape of eachbut we know that it will contain n random elements from the population Here’s the ABSOLUTELY CRUCIAL PART of the proof. We know for a fact that the a’s from the population will appear on and off in each, the important thing is to ask how many times will each a appear? This result requires a proof even beyond my own capability, and I’m simply going to quote the result from my own observation: “If the population size is N and the sample size is n, each element in the population will appeartimes in the sampling distribution.” But we know that Again we will adopt a simpler notation temporarily. Let Reminder: represents the number of times each element in the population will appear in the sampling distribution. We know that where Here’s the clincher. Since each element in the population will appeartimes, I can perform the following tour de force Which simplifies to Before I restore the original expressions forand, I need to perform a sleight of hand maneuver for Convince yourself that...

Words: 303 - Pages: 2

...The Proof of Miracles Miracle is such a strong word in the world, but what classifies a miracle? Do miracles even exist? According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, a miracle is defined as an extraordinary event manifesting divine intervention in human affairs. Through my personal experience, I can say that miracles do exist. I went from having fun, to going blind in one eye, to having sight in both eyes better than 20/20 within less than two months. My story starts off with me and my three brothers playing paintball, a sport with two teams where the object of the game is to shoot the other team to win. We played about three games of paintball and the last game had just ended. We all took off our masks and my oldest brother was out of bullets, so we thought. He started to shoot the ground and all that came out of his gun was CO2 (a chemical compound composed of two oxygen atoms covalently bonded to a single carbon atom, which makes a gas at standard temperature and pressure). After he shot the ground, my oldest brother started shooting at my feet and slowly moved the gun up my body until he got to my face. Then out of nowhere, two paintballs came out of the gun and hit me in the mouth and the eye. Everything changed from joking around to sheer panic. Everyone dropped their gear, and my oldest brother picked me up in his arms, and rushed me into the house. The paintballs that hit me were filled with red paint, so it was hard to tell what was blood and what was paint. My......

Words: 1071 - Pages: 5

...Title: Proof of God’s Existence By: Vicki Williams PHI208 Ethics and Moral Reasoning Instructor: Barbara Palomino de Velasco June 10, 2013 The Bible diagnoses humanity's deepest need and then prescribes what it claims is the only antidote: God saves sinners. Is there an intellectual basis for believing in God? Or is being religious just a matter of faith? Christianity invites scrutiny into its claims and its reasons for having faith and these deserve examination... Some people feel that acceptance of God is entirely a matter of faith. But the Scriptures actually claim that it is the truth which is the basis for this faith (Rom. 10:17). Truth is only truth if it is objective truth, that is, it is true for everyone regardless of time or circumstances. Thus, God is either true (and there can be objective proofs to support this), or He is not true and only subjective 'truth' can be offered for 'proof'. Some ancient Philosophers have argued that the fact mankind can imagine there being a God is a proof that there must be one. While this argument does have some merit, it mainly has limitations. Taken to its natural application this means that if anything can be imagined it must exist. Based on the nightmares I had as a three and four year old boy- I really hope this theory isn't true or I'm not going to sleep well tonight! On the other hand, 'beliefs' and 'truth' are sometimes not entirely related. Tertullian once bragged that the main reason he so readily......

Words: 2629 - Pages: 11

...Recently I watched this YouTube video called "Mathematical Proof Of No God" where this guy used Set Theory to prove that God doesn't exist. Being intrigued by that, I set out and successfully proved the same exact thing, using the same exact assumptions he used but with one differece: I used Boolean Logic and he used Set Theory. So here's my proof: Recently I watched this YouTube video called "Mathematical Proof Of No God" where this guy used Set Theory to prove that God doesn't exist. Being intrigued by that, I set out and successfully proved the same exact thing, using the same exact assumptions he used but with one differece: I used Boolean Logic and he used Set Theory. So here's my proof: Proof of the Non-Existance of God Assumptions: 1) Set: "something which contains elements." Denoted as: "{ }" 2) God: "omnipotent being, who has the power to do anything and there is nothing he /she cannot to." Denoted as: "God". 3) Fact: "there is no universal set that isn't contained in another set, including itself. Denoted as: "U". 4) Consequence: "God is a universal set of powers." IF: "x" is the set which contains all elements of powers, AND God has the power to do anything and there is nothing it couldn't do, THEN: God is the universal quantifier of all "x": {x,x1,x2,x3,...xn} Λ God → God{∀x} But - Considering a well known law of set theory - IF: God is the universal quantifier of all x, THEN: God MUST be......

Words: 713 - Pages: 3

...LOGICAL INFERENCE & PROOFs Debdeep Mukhopadhyay Dept of CSE, IIT Madras Defn • A theorem is a mathematical assertion which can be shown to be true. A proof is an argument which establishes the truth of a theorem. Nature & Importance of Proofs • In mathematics, a proof is: – a correct (well-reasoned, logically valid) and complete (clear, detailed) argument that rigorously & undeniably establishes the truth of a mathematical statement. • Why must the argument be correct & complete? – Correctness prevents us from fooling ourselves. – Completeness allows anyone to verify the result. • In this course (& throughout mathematics), a very high standard for correctness and completeness of proofs is demanded!! Overview • Methods of mathematical argument (i.e., proof methods) can be formalized in terms of rules of logical inference. • Mathematical proofs can themselves be represented formally as discrete structures. • We will review both correct & fallacious inference rules, & several proof methods. Applications of Proofs • An exercise in clear communication of logical arguments in any area of study. • The fundamental activity of mathematics is the discovery and elucidation, through proofs, of interesting new theorems. • Theorem-proving has applications in program verification, computer security, automated reasoning systems, etc. • Proving a theorem allows us to rely upon on its correctness even in the most critical scenarios. Proof Terminology •......

Words: 2416 - Pages: 10

...[pic] OUM BUSINESS SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION AND ASSESSMENT _________________________________________________________________________ BMME5103 MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS JANUARY 2015 _________________________________________________________________________ INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS 1. This assignment contains question that is set in English. 2. Answer in English only. 3. Your assignment should be typed using 12 point Times New Roman font and 1.5 line spacing. 4. You must submit your hardcopy assignment to your Fasilitator and ON-LINE via the MyVLE. Refer to the portal for instructions on the procedures to submit your assignment on-line. You are advised to keep a copy of your submitted assignment and proof of the submission for personal reference. Your assignment must be submitted on 21st – 29th March 2015. 5. Your assignment should be prepared individually. You should not copy another person’s assignment. You should also not plagiarise another person’s work as your own. EVALUATION This assignment accounts for 60% of the total marks for the course. ASSIGNMENT QUESTION PART 1 PURPOSE: The purpose of PART 1 of this assignment is to enable the students to understand the fundamental economic concept and to apply his/her knowledge on factors affecting demand; in particular when more than one factors change simultaneously. REQUIREMENT: 1. The concept of a marginal use value that declines as the rate of......

Words: 1941 - Pages: 8

...precedents * If b is the result of a and c is equal to a then b is the result of c as well * Proof of acts * How do we prove things * Presumptions in law are set in hundreds of years of legal precedents * The party that has the burden of overcoming the presumption of that law has the burden of proof * At common law over the course of 300 years, three burdens of proof evolve. * The Default Position: * When in doubt, this is the burden of proof * Preponderance of the evidence * More likely than not * Whoever has the burden of proof, has the obligation to present anything over 50% * Ex: * Two people suing each other in a car accident * Person files compliant, other files counter, both have the burden * Have to prove the other ran the red light * Joint whiteness says that the traffic signal was working so someone did run the light * Person A has 17 witnesses that says B ran the light * B has 3 witnesses * From a quantitative basis, there is no question here * A has proven that he has the greater weight * B has someone that doesn’t know either party * Evidence is the default burden of proof * If a jury decides the evidence is even, whoever has the burden of proof loses. * Common law begins to realize that in some situations for a variety of reasons, there is a......

Words: 625 - Pages: 3

...Ieesh M. Irving TANTH 365/ Autumn 2014 Film Response Watching Rabbit Proof Fence was not only enlightening but also appalling to have seen. I never heard of the atrocities that the aborigines experienced at the hands of the British government prior to this movie. The British government took oppression to another level. This was the story of how Molly, her sister Daisy, and cousin Gracie were stolen from their family and their dangerous expedition of returning home to their family. It features Mr. A.O. Neville, the Chief Protector of Aborigines, as the evil antagonist who believed that his mission was to protect the aborigines from themselves. This story told of some of the countless people that were part of “The Stolen Generation”, which are the children, which were labeled half-caste, that were taken from their Aborigine parent by the Australian government. This removal occurred between the early 1900’s up until the 1970’s. Not only did the Australian government The story begins in 1931 in west Australia. This is the time the Aborigines Act granted the government the authority to act as a legal guardian of every Aborigine in west Australia. This meant the government had control of who the Aborigines can meet or marry and where they work and lived. This gave Mr. Neville the power to remove half-caste children from their families. As a mother, I think that would be the cruelest thing you can do to a person; take their baby away from them. It would be easier to die......

Words: 713 - Pages: 3

...What is a proof? Yes- there is a big leap when we prove something from everyday axioms. But do they not assume the title of axioms once proved? If they were axioms, what is the need to prove it? Does it not reflect the inability of a person to actually see the ‘obvious’ when he is searching for proofs? Let me be clear that I enjoy a well written and elegant proof and am immensely discontent when I am unable to prove a seemingly obvious statement. But is not the fact that my intuition suggests that the statement has to be true reason enough? You may argue that a proof leaves nothing to chance and gives you a guarantee that the statement has to be true. But when you dissect a proof right down to its base axiom, there you will have to rely on an assumption- that our intuition deems valid. I am not here to argue on the basis of the correctness in our underlying assumption of the base axiom. Proofs are merely a way to deduce results from a given premise. And the premise here is the truth of the axiom. I am uncomfortable about the fact that people are willing to accept the intuition behind the base axiom but not the intuition behind the results that follow. True, in most cases it is easier to be aware of the former- and the latter may be hard to see as obvious. A case in point would be Fermat’s last theorem. Andrew Wiles did come up with an absolutely marvellous proof of the theorem- something that puzzled the greatest minds for three and a half centuries. But in those three......

Words: 521 - Pages: 3

...In this essay, I will describe the life of the Aboriginals in Australia, a characterisation of the character Jack McPhee and some comments of his experiences in the novel “Wanamurraganya”, an analysis of “Mary’s Song Cycle”, and finally I will talk about the movie “Rabbit Proof Fence” First, I will like to start talking about who and what the Aboriginals are, they were the original residentes of Australia and they have been there since around 45.000 years ago, however the Aboriginals claim they trace their creation back to the “Dreamtime”, an era where the earth were created. Before the first settlers came to Australia in 1788, the Aboriginal people lived throughout Australia, although the most of the population lived along the coast. Today more than half of all Aboriginals live in cities, often in cruel conditions with bad educations, and some with the habit of drug, alcohol and smoking addictions. The novel starts with that Jack McPhee is born in 1905, and that he is an illegitimate son of an Aboriginal woman and white station owner. Mary’s Song Cycle is made Ruby Langford Ginibi, she is born Jan 26 1934 and she died Oct 1 2011, she a Bundjalung author, historian and lecturer on Aboriginal history, culture and politics. The poem is narrative, because it a tells a story, the story is about the “stolen generation” and how the Australian government treated the Aboriginals, the poem ask the reader where it’s people, children, traditions and warriors are, but right in......

Words: 654 - Pages: 3

...Law and Health Care- Proof of Negligence Vickie Young Dr. L. Forbes Strayer University January 22, 2012 Identify and explain the four elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to prove a negligence case. Negligence is defined as “conduct that falls below the standards of behavior established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm. A person has acted negligently if he or she has departed from the conduct of a reasonably prudent person acting under similar circumstances” (Legal Dictionary,n.a.). This conduct is also referred to as “duty of care” (Showalter, 2008, pg.47, para.1). Though negligence is one of the most common types of lawsuits relative to the medical industry, it requires significant proof. The four elements that must be present to prove negligence are as follows: duty of care, breach of said duty, injury, and causation (Showalter, 2008, pg.47, para.1). Duty of care has been defined previously as the reasonable and expected behavior of one in a particular situation. It is somewhat of a given standard that is simply understood. If there is a breach of this expected behavior and there is injury to person or property, and the breach is shown to have caused the injury, then the person or persons, who did not perform or behave as expected, may be liable for the injuries it caused. The challenge for proving negligence in a medical arena is complex since the jury may not have the professional experience to......

Words: 1320 - Pages: 6

...copies)4)Pre-shipment inspection certificate (PSI)/ CRF certificate5)Shipment advice (3 copies)6)Packing list (7 copies)7)Fright charge certificate given by the advising bankFor realizing goods following documents are necessarya.Bill of entry (3 copies)b.CRF certificate The following things needs to be noted for import or export 1)Goods will not transmit through Israel.2)At least 2% packing, TIN and date are needed3)For importing machinery Import registration certificate is not required.4)For importing food items 2 additional certificates have to be submittedby the exportera)Phytosanitary Certificate: This certificate contains about thecontents and acceptable range of good/foods. b) Fumigation Certificate: Fumigation certificate is required as proof that the packing materials e.g. wooden crates, wood, wool etc.),have been fumigated or sterilized. Certificates contain details suchas purpose of treatment, articles concerned, temperature rangeused, chemicals and concentration used etc.5)If the advising bank and the negotiation bank are same then bill of exchange is not required. There are 3 types of LC offered by City Bank 1)Sight/cash LC: Payment must be made within 5 working days.2)Differed LC: Payment will be done at negotiable future date.3)Stand by LC Procedures of Opening Back to Back LC Submission of LC original copy and local seller Pro-forma invoiceFormal application from the exporting companyAdvising bank need to send proposal to head office along withexport......

Words: 6837 - Pages: 28

...Word Count: 343 “ Prophecies as Proof” After reading the article of Arguments by Dr. Elmer Towns, and also watching his video, in my personal opinion, I am inclined to state that the argument strongest to defend the fact that the Bible is the Word of God, would have to be argument number three, which states that the Bible is the proven Word of God because of its predictions not only about Names, Dates, and Events, but also about the Nations, including Israel. I believe that if it were not for God, who lives outside of the human nature’s time limitations, and understanding, and inability to predict the future, there would be no existence of inerrancy in His Word, especially when it comes to the subject of predictions and prophecies. Dr. Towns notes a very interesting aspect, which I had never stopped to think about. He states on page 49 that “The enemies of Scripture usually do not attack the fact of fulfilled prophecy. They usually try to explain it away. “ The Bible does not only talk of names, such as Cyrus, or Josiah, whom were predicted by their exact names more than one hundred years before their births, but the Bible goes further, to predict the main theme of God’s Word; the Messiah. These prophecies of the Messiah go into enough detail to state the location, the date, and the fact of a supernatural virginal birth. Not only does the Bible speak of Jesus’ birth, but His life on earth, His death, and ultimately, His resurrection (Towns, 49, 50). In......

Words: 348 - Pages: 2