Business Law and Company Liability

In: Other Topics

Submitted By lshixian
Words 971
Pages 4
Liability of the members in relation to the obligations of the business organisation

Sole proprietorship
The sole proprietor and the owner is regarded as the same entity. Therefore, the owner has unlimited liability in relation to the obligations of the business organisation. This would be a disadvantage as the owner’s personal assets are at risk as the owner is personally responsible for all debts and obligations of the business as regarded by law.

Same as above.

Limited liability partnership (LLP)
The LLP is a separate legal entity whereby LLP’s liabilities are its own. Therefore the partners will not be personally liable for the LLP’s debts and obligations.

Limited Partnership
LP is not a separate legal entity. However, only the general partner who takes part in the management of the firm is personally liable for debts and obligations of the LP.
The limited partner liability is capped at the amount of the agreed investment in LP and his other assets would not be at risks. It should be noted that the limited partner should not take part in the management of the firm otherwise he would be considered a general partner and his liability will be unlimited.

The company is considered as a separate legal entity and the company’s assets are its own. The company’s liabilities are also its own and the shareholders and directors of the company are not personally liable. This is also exemplified in the case of Saloman v A Salomon & Co Ltd (1987) where the court held that the shareholders are not liable for the firm’s liabilities.
Exceptions to this are when the directors are fraudulent or incur debts without the reasonable prospect of payment. These would render the directors invovled personally liable for fraud or debts. (see summary notes)

In a limited company, in the event of winding up, the liability of the members are…...

Similar Documents

Company Law

...COMPANY LAW – Part 1 By Carl T. Abruquah Introduction The company is a form of business organization that involves a greater number of owners than a sole proprietorship or a partnership. It is a form that has arisen to meet the exigencies, complexity and rapidly expanding dimensions of business. It is a convenient form of business organizations in the sense that it enables investors to contribute to the capital of the organization without taking active part in its management. The rules governing companies and its management have developed over time as disputes arose and were resolved. Eventually, most countries have tended to codify these rules and practices in companies legislation. In Ghana, the two main legislation governing companies are the Companies Act, 1963 Act 179, and the Bodies Corporate (Official Liquidations) Act, 1963 Act 180. Nature of a Company In Salomon V Salomon and Co 1897, the court held that a company has a separate legal personality from that of its owners. A company can therefore sue other parties and be sued by other parties in its own name. A company is thus said to have a juristic personality, in other words a personality created by law. Section 24 of the Companies Code codifies this concept by providing that a company has the powers of a natural person of full capacity. Another term for this concept is the veil of incorporation. Another case that illustrates this concept is Macaura V Nothern Assurance Co. - 1925 in this case, the...

Words: 6420 - Pages: 26

Company Law

...The Companies Act 2006 ( CA2006) was implement on 1st of October 2009. The Act contains an extensive code of company for United Kingdom and altered most of the aspect of the law in relation to companies. Furthermore, plenty of provisions for public and private had been introduced. Moreover the long term of investment and shareholder engagement has been enhanced. Sole Trader is owned or run a private corporation by one person who can control over decision making. Moreover the owner entitled to receive an all the profits. The drawbacks are unlimited risk for example the owner is entitled to pay off the debenture and damage of his business. It also has finance limited to resources of an individual. Partnership is consists of two or more individual and equally liable for the debts incurred by the business. It can share expensive resources and risks together. Moreover, undertake heavy workload. There would be a problem if the partnership changes. Limited Liability Partnership is a general partner which was introduced by The Limited Libility Partnership Act 2000. It is a separate legal personality and hybrid. Do not need to apply Partnership law. Partners are not directly responsible for debts. Limited Liability Company is a separate legal entity personality with limited liability. Has potential to acess winder range of funding. The disadvantages are accounting arrangement made public. It may be an illusion for small company. Company limited by Shares have ability to increase...

Words: 312 - Pages: 2

Company Law

...MEANING, CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPES OF A COMPANY STRUCTURE 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.0 Objective Introduction Meaning of Company Characteristics of a Company Distinction between Company and Partnership Types of Company Summary Keywords Self Assessment Questions Suggested Readings OBJECTIVE After reading this lesson, you should be able to: (a) (b) (c) 1.1 Define a company and explain its features. Make a distribution between company and partnership firm. Explain the various types of companies. INTRODUCTION Industrial has revolution led to the emergence of large scale business organizations. These organization require big investments and the risk involved is very high. Limited resources and unlimited liability of partners are two important limitations of partnerships of partnerships in undertaking big business. Joint Stock Company form of business organization has become extremely popular as it provides a solution to (1) overcome the limitations of partnership business. The Multinational companies like Coca-Cola and, General Motors have their investors and customers spread throughout the world. The giant Indian Companies may include the names like Reliance, Talco Bajaj Auto, Infosys Technologies, Hindustan Lever Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., and Larsen and Tubro etc. 1.2 MEANING OF COMPANY Section 3 (1) (i) of the Companies Act, 1956 defines a company as “a company formed and registered under this Act or an existing company”. Section 3(1) (ii) Of the......

Words: 114302 - Pages: 458

Company Law

...based on company law. Therefore the first concept to look at is the definition of company law, which is mainly dealt with Companies Act 2006. The definition for this is that a company law is a legislation under which the formation, registration, supervision and closure of a firm is managed and controlled. As company law is understood, the scenario involved in the coursework will be resolved. This will be done by first discussing if Barack Brown can be removed as a director and if so how this can be achieved. Then it will be explained how Ben and Geri can be made directors. As well as that, it will be made clear how the name of the company will be changed. How the shares will be issued will also be discussed in great detail and how Geri cannot be removed as a director without her consent. These proposals will be achieved by great reference to many resources and by quoting case laws relevant and referring to provisions of company legislation. A company is defined as group of people who contribute money to a common stock and who employ this in a business. They also share the profit arising as well as loss. There are three common types of businesses in Scotland and they are the sole trader, limited liability company and the partnership. A company has a separate legal personality. This means that even though the shareholders are the owners of the company they do not own any business operations but the company. Shareholders have also no responsibility in business......

Words: 2136 - Pages: 9

Company Law

...1. Easy Groceries Pty Ltd: the Company Issue The issue here is Easy Groceries Pty Ltd is liable for the debts incurred as a separate legal entity to its directors and shareholders? Or will its directors be personally liable for its debts? Law Upon incorporation, a company becomes a separate legal entity from its directors and members (s119). It can sue and be sued, acquire assets and debts, and enter into contracts in its own name. Its existence can lasts a lifetime as well. The Doctrine of Separate Legal Entity also known as “corporate veil” entails that the Directors of a Company have no personal liability while its Shareholders are only liable up to the amount they paid for their shares. In Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd Case, Mr. Salomon was the majority shareholder and a secured creditor of the company. Upon winding up, the liquidators argued that Mr. Salomon must not be considered as a secured creditor since he was in control of the company itself. But the Court’s decision recognized Mr. Salomon as a secured creditor since the company has a separate legal personality from the directors and shareholder upon its registration and it has nothing to do with Mr. Salomon being a secured creditor. Application Applying s119 corporations act, Easy Groceries Pty Ltd is a separate legal entity from its directors and shareholders, meaning that Easy Groceries Pty Ltd as a company itself is liable for the debts that occurred. Conclusion As an own legal......

Words: 2658 - Pages: 11

Company Law

...Charles Prospect to |give the required presentation to the client | | |deliver his presentation to Bean & Co. |It should clearly describe the personality of a company | | |The report will be assessed for the |separate from its owners and board | | |demonstrated knowledge of the legal |It should also describe the process by which a company | | |formation of a company, forms of |can be formed and registered | | |corporate body and procedures for company|The different forms of corporate body that can be formed| | |formation. Case Study 1 provides |should be clearly described | | |background information for this. | | | | | | | | | | | |Candidates should give written answers to|Answers should provide clear understanding of how a | | |the three questions on company finance. |company’s financial arrangements can be understood | |2. | |Shares ......

Words: 3692 - Pages: 15

Company Law

...Contents Task 1: Understanding the nature of a Company 3 1.1. Concept of corporate Personality 3 1.2. Lifting the veil 3 1.3. Advantages and disadvantages of incorporation 3 1.4. Promoters 4 1.5. Pre-incorporation contract 5 1.6. Requirements of registration of an incorporated business entity 5 1.7. Requirements for trading commencements 5 Task 2 Memorandum, Articles of Association, ultra Vires and their Effects and contents of Prospectus 6 2.1 Requirements for memorandum of association 6 2.2 Articles of Association 6 2.3 Evaluation of doctrine of ultra vires and its effects 6 2.4 Contents of a prospectus and listing particulars 7 Task 3 types of capital, laws relating to issue of shares and dividends, capital maintenance and insider dealings 8 3.1 Types of Share Capital 8 3.2 Law regarding Issue of shares, class rights and dividends 8 3.3. Capital maintenance 9 3.4. Insider dealings 10 Task 4: Understanding about shareholders, directors, charges and insolvency 10 4.1-The Role and powers of the directors: 10 4.2-Different Types of Meetings: 11 4.3-Law on Minority Protection: 11 4.4-Rights of Stakeholders and Debenture Holders: 12 4.5-Liquidation: 12 Bibliography 13 Task 1: Understanding the nature of a Company 1.1. Concept of corporate Personality Corporate personality means that “the company’s liabilities are the legal responsibility of the company and the members will not be liable for the company’s debts” (Talbot,......

Words: 4463 - Pages: 18

Company Law

...entity concept + limited liability concept ( corporate veil, which ensures that shareholders are not personally liable to creditors for their company’s debts, even though: ❖ all the company’s shares are beneficially owned by one person; and ❖ the sole purpose of the company was to obtain the benefit of limited liability. Macaura v Northern Assurance: Where a member transfers property to his company, he loses any proprietary interest in the property. [A company owns property distinct from the property of its members.] LIFTING the corporate veil Incorporation for a fraudulent/improper purpose ❖ Gilford Motor v Horne: If the company was formed for the primary purpose of avoiding existing contractual obligations, the corporate veil is lifted. ➢ *H resigned from his position as managing director of GM. ➢ *H started a business under his name which competed with GM. ➢ *H discovered that the former service agreement provided that he would not, at any time, solicit customers of GM. ➢ *A company was incorporated in the name of H’s wife, which then conducted the business. ➢ *Although H was not a shareholder of the company, he conducted its affairs. ➢ *The company sent circulars to GM’s customers, seeking their business. ➢ The company was formed for the purpose of avoiding existing contractual obligations ( it was a “mere cloak or sham” used as a device ( corporate veil was lifted. Agency relationship of holding company & subsidiary ❖ Adams......

Words: 752 - Pages: 4

Company Law for Business 100

...Company Law for Business: Assignment 1 (i): Is the cat contract with Feline Fertility Pty Ltd enforceable? Your answer should include an analysis of the reason put forward by Lassie Ltd for terminating the contract. The area of law relating to this particular question is the Corporations Act 2001 section 124, which mentions the legal capacity and powers of a company, and section 125 (2), which refers to a company's objects within its constitution. As Lassie Ltd is a company, it is a separate legal entity, meaning it can enter into contracts in the same legal way a normal human being could. Lassie Ltd's constitution includes the objects clause stating that the company's activities are to be restricted to the breeding and selling of dogs and goods and services associated with dogs, this is why Lassie Ltd wants to terminate the contract. This objects clause does not prevent the company from entering into any contracts as the company can enter into any contract that it wants to as it is a separate legal entity. Despite the fact that Lassie Ltd broke its company constitution, the contract is still enforceable with Feline Fertility Pty Ltd due to the abolishment of doctrine of ultra vires. The abolishment of doctrine of ultra vires means a company cannot enter into contracts beyond their power and then later avoid their legal obligations on the grounds that they had no legal capacity to enter into the contract. Lassie Ltd knowingly entered into the contract to purchase 300...

Words: 2714 - Pages: 11

Company Law

...INTRODUCTION Company law has now put on a broad scope as a result of global economic and technological advancement in this era thus touching on a number of disciplines. Issues pertaining to the company and its administration has been clearly spelled out in the Companies Act 1963 (Act 179) of Ghana. Company law (or the law of business associations) is the field of law concerning companies and other business organizations. This includes corporations, partnerships and other associations which usually carry on some form of economic or charitable activity. The most prominent kind of company, usually referred to as a "corporation", is a "juristic person", i.e. it has separate legal personality, and those who invest money into the business have limited liability for any losses the company makes, governed by corporate law. The largest companies are usually publicly listed on stock exchanges around the world. Even single individuals, also known as sole traders may incorporate themselves and limit their liability in order to carry on a business. All different forms of companies depend on the particular law of the particular country in which they reside. MEMBERS MEETINGS AND RESOLUTIONS Members of a company are, according to section 30 of the Companies Act are; (1) The subscribers to the Regulations shall be deemed to be members of the company and on its registration shall be entered as members in the register of members referred to in section 32 of this Code (Section 30 (1)). ...

Words: 1080 - Pages: 5

Company Law

...Nationals specification in Business Contents Unit 1: Business Environment 1 Unit 2: Managing Financial Resources and Decisions 7 Unit 3: Organisations and Behaviour 13 Unit 4: Marketing Principles 19 Unit 5: Aspects of Contract and Negligence for Business 25 Unit 6: Business Decision Making 29 Unit 7: Business Strategy 33 Unit 8: Research Project 39 Unit 9: Management Accounting: Costing and Budgeting 43 Unit 10: Financial Accounting and Reporting 47 Unit 11: Financial Systems and Auditing 51 Unit 12: Taxation 55 Unit 13: Personal and Professional Development 59 Unit 14: Working with and Leading People 65 Unit 15: Managing Business Activities to Achieve Results 69 Unit 16: Managing Communications, Knowledge and Information 73 Unit 17: Marketing Intelligence 77 Unit 18: Advertising and Promotion in Business 83 Unit 19: Marketing Planning 89 Unit 20: Sales Planning and Operations 95 Unit 21: Human Resource Management 101 Unit 22: Managing Human Resources 107 Unit 23: Human Resources Development 113 Unit 24: Employee Relations 117 Unit 25: English Legal System 121 Unit 26: Business Law 125 Unit 27: Further Aspects of Contract and Tort 131 Unit 28: European Law 135 Unit 29: The Internet and E-Business 139 Unit......

Words: 55219 - Pages: 221

Company Law

...Company Law Assignment Tak Wing Ho Alvin Part A 1.The concept of corporate personality Corporate Personality refers to a legally established company, which itself is authorized by law "person", in addition to the company itself, it does not belong to any individual, group. In other word, the company is a legal entity separate from its members. The company was established by law, will be awarded on a legal independent personality, the company became an independent entity and its members are independent of personality, which is the basic content of corporate personality. Accordingly, an independent company with its own name, in recognition of its independent existence Subsidiary refers to a company certain amount of shares of another company controlled by or pursuant to the agreement is actually controlled by another company, dominated. A subsidiary of an independent legal entity, with all his property, his own company name, articles of association and the board of directors, in their own name to carry out business activities, are engaged in various civil activities, independent bear all the consequences and responsibilities arising from corporate actions, but major decisions involving the interests of the company or major personnel arrangements, still determined by the parent company. Although the subsidiaries controlled by the Evergreen Co. Ltd. , but legally independent subsidiary companies still have legal status. It has its own name...

Words: 1697 - Pages: 7

Company Law

...son wants to be his business partner, so Mr. Salomon business into a limited company. Then according to the company law, set up a company to be at least 7 shareholders holding at further 1 share each. So, Mr. Salomon gave himself a shares, also gave him a share of his wife and five children. Mr. Salomon company 20007 shares, but he holds 20001 shares, and his family members each have a share. With the passage of time, Mr. Salomon's company faces the difficulty. In order to raise funds, and also the company, Mr. Salomon sold its own debt to Benedick. To raise the money but can't let company to prevent more problems, because the money is used for business. Creditors discovered the money just can be used to repay the debt creditors holding it, it's considered a secured creditor. This event will be brought to the court or the Supreme Court. They all think that creditors cannot recover their entire debt contract with the company, so not with Mr. Salomon. After a series of the appeals, it is considered by Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd is a company, with separate legal personality qualification, so also can’t say Mr. Salomon owned by the company. The company and Mr. Salomon have two legal persons in the law. So it is has the right to enter into a contract. The principle in Salomon are a company must be an independent legal person, but from other members or shareholders. The principle of Salomon must also know the veil of incorporation of the company. If a company will formally......

Words: 1005 - Pages: 5

Company Law

... COMPANY LAW 266 ASSIGNMENT RUTHRAN SEEVANATHAN 14550036 SEMINAR FRIDAY 1-4PM TUTOR: YVONNE TIEN Company Law266 Assignment (a) What means, if any, are available to ‘Health Plus’, to expel Annabel from the partnership? Introduction to law The area of law addressed in this issue is Partnerships: Partnership agreement, Fidicuary Duties of partners and expulsion from the partnership. Explaination of law Section 7(1) of the Partnership act states that a partnership can be defined as the contractual relationship between two or more persons with a common view for profit. Partnerships don’t always have to be written contracts. They can be deemed as functional partnerships by other means. Informally- Oral Agreement: is where partners agree to start a business in common and proceed to start up a business with a common view of profit by just word of mouth. As shown in the Miah V Khan[2000] UKHL 55; [2001] 1 All ER 20 case. The partnership fell out before operations of the Indian restaurant had began, but even though they had not carried out business together, they were still deemed a partnership because they worked in common and had a common view to profits. Conduct: Partners can be working together and aiding each other in earn profit but not being in a contract together. The partnership act still classifies them as partners .This can be reflected in the Goudberg V Herniman Assoc Pty Ltd [2007]VSCA 12. Williams engaged an artichect to draw up floor plans for the venture and......

Words: 1733 - Pages: 7

Company Law

...Given name Surname Student number Email Unit name Unit code Assignment title Date submitted Student’s comment to tutor Shin Huey Tan 7E1A8643/ 15582218 Company Law 266 10841 Seminar Essay 23 March 2012 Marker’s comments Recorded mark Marker Comments Step 1: Identify the Areas of Law The areas of law applicable to this problem are relationship between partners which particularly based on partner expulsion and liability to third parties or outsiders. Step 2: Discuss the Principles of Law Under Section 7(1) of Partnership Act 1895 WA, partnership refers to a structure where two or more persons in a business are acting in common with a view of profit. Partnerships can be formed formally by written agreement which contains the rights and obligations of the partners and facilitates the resolution of disputes within a partnership. However, if the agreement is deficient, Partnership Act will be referred for resolutions. Partnership can also be formed by oral agreement or implied by the conduct of the parties (Harris, Hargovan and Adams, 101-103). Partners in a partnership are in a fiduciary relationship which partners have the duty to act in good faith, including avoid conflicts of interests, not make private profits, not compete with the firm and not disclose confidential information. The rules related to interests, rights and duties of partners will be provided in the written or oral agreement. (Harris, Hargovan and Adams, 131).......

Words: 1919 - Pages: 8