Enron - a Fraud Case Summary

In: Business and Management

Submitted By geprads
Words 487
Pages 2
FORENSIC ACCOUNTING
ENRON: The Smartest Guys in the Room
Movie Summary
Gerald Prayogo
-------------------------------------------------
342858

Enron: The Smartest Guys in the room is a documentary movie based on the book of the same name. Essentially, it tells us about one of the biggest fraud ever performed in the US. It tells us of the downfall of Enron: its scandals, the prosecution of its perpetrators, as well as its role in California electricity crisis. The film describes the biggest names on the fraudulent corporation. First is Kenneth Lay, the founder of Enron. Kenneth, nicknamed ‘Kenny Boy’ by his spouse, got the company into scandal in just two years after its establishment, after Enron’s managers bet on oil markets. The second is Jeffrey Skilling, the man who utilized mark-to-market accounting, which allow Enron to appear as being a profitable company, even if the reality might not be so. He also applied the Darwinian philosophy on Enron by establishing a ‘rank and yank’ system, a system of which a group of review commitees grades employees and fires the bottom fifteen percent. Skilling was also described as having a soft spot for “guys with spikes”; which made him recruit J. Clifford Baxter, a manic-depressive; and Lou Pai, the CEO of Enron Energy Services which was known for using shareholder money to pay strippers. Enron managed to get a myriad of profits during the dot-com bubble by using the process known as “pump and dump”: pushing up their stock prices and taking the massive options. Enron also tried to get public’s attention by launching a series of PR campaign, which gave it the impression of being a profitable company, although performing poorly elsewhere. Enron failed in several projects, such as weather trading, movies on demand by broadband, and Dabhol Power Company. However, due to mark-to-market accounting, nonexistent profits are…...

Similar Documents

The Function of Accounting Information Systems in the Enron and Bernard Madoff Fraud Cases

...CASE STUDY #1 | The Function of Accounting Information Systems in the Enron and Bernard Madoff Fraud Cases | | | | | | | What is the definition of accounting information system? The Core Concepts of Accounting Information Systems textbook defines accounting information system “as a collection of data and processing procedures that creates needed information for its users” (Bagranoff, 2010). A key factor in determining the success in an organization is its accounting information system. It is the combination of the organization’s resources, such as its people, procedures, and business records that it (the organization) maintains to provide financial data. The basis of this case study is to disagree with the question of whether or not accounting information systems played a role in the Enron and Bernard Madoff fraud cases. All organizations should have an adequate, effective, and efficient accounting information system in tack. In my opinion, the Enron and Bernard Madoff fraud cases had the classic signs of pure greed; the accounting information systems were perhaps manipulated, ignored, and compromised to financially suit the personal gains of the individuals involved and did not assist with the cases. An important part of the accounting information system is its internal control system. Internal controls are methods and procedures used by an organization to safeguard assets, authorize transactions, and ensure accuracy of the accounting......

Words: 571 - Pages: 3

Enron Case

...INTRODUCTION Enron was formed during 1985.   Enron was a very powerful company that was doing very well in the market. Enron had been a power supplier to utilities.  Its business began through the merger of Houston Natural Gas and Omaha-based Inter North.  In the following 20 years, Enron grew quickly and became the largest energy trader in the world.  By the end of the twenty century, Enron had many honorable titles, such as “one of the world’s leading electricity, natural gas, and communications companies”, “the world most admired corporations”, and so on.   In the following years, with the increase of competition, Enron decided to use diversification and international investment to keep its market position.  Actually, these activities brought Enron an unexpected large amount of losses rather than profits.   In 1999, after a foray into fiber optics and the broadband market, which was a wrong decision again, Enron suffered too many substantial losses and began bleeding quickly.  However, Enron had never declared any information about its losses until October 2001.  Instead, in these years, Enron achieved a phenomenal bottom-line through overstating revenues and hiding liabilities. Besides manipulated the financial statements, Enron never mentioned the risks which it should disclose to its investors.  On the contrary, the executives of Enron disclosed a great earnings forecast through the media and encouraged investors to purchase Enron’s stocks.  They also suggested......

Words: 3864 - Pages: 16

Enron Case

...Enron Case Study Seven years after the fact, the story of the meteoric rise and subsequent fall of the Enron Corporation continues to capture the imagination of the general public. What really happened with Enron? Outside of those associated with the corporate world, either through business or education, relatively few people seem to have a complete sense of the myriad people, places, and events making up the sixteen years of Enron’s existence as an American energy company. Some argue Enron’s record-breaking bankruptcy and eventual demise was the result of a lack of ethical corporate behavior attributed, more generally, to capitalism’s inability to check the unmitigated growth of corporate greed. Others believe Enron’s collapse can be traced back to questionable accounting practices such as mark-to-market accounting and the utilization of Special Purpose Entities (SPE’s) to hide financial debt. In other instances, people point toward Enron’s mismanagement of risk and overextension of capital resources, coupled with the stark philosophical differences in management that existed between company leaders, as the primary reasons why the company went bankrupt. Yet, despite these various analyses of why things went wrong, the story of Enron’s rise and fall continues to mystify the general public as well as generate continued interest in what actually happened. The broad purpose of this paper is to investigate the Enron scandal from variety perspectives. The paper begins with a......

Words: 5799 - Pages: 24

Enron Fraud

...Q:How Enron fraud? A:1.Stock Option Incentive motivation of fraud 2.Defective internal control mechanisms 3.Complex financial reporting. Answer 3: Enron in financial problems are mainly reflected in four aspects: First, to complex financial structures Enron conceal the problems. In support of Enron-like explosive growth, with Enron complex corporate networks and related transaction, Enron's management to create a very complex financial structure, not only retail investors can not understand, and even Wall Street analysts and accounting professor are difficult to interpret. Enron's use of complex financial structure, unbridled fictitious profits, hidden debt.  Second, the accounting treatment Enron pioneered a number of technologies, enabling the company to record revenue generating profit and loss information has not been long-term contracts. For example, Enron uses a technique called "MTM (Mark-to-Market) "accounting system, the accounting system to allow Enron and other energy companies to increase their current net income from the book, and these contracts in 10 years or may not be realized in the longer. Meanwhile, the accounting system also requires that a company can not disclose how the details of the valuation of the order, it may not disclose how much revenue from such non-cash benefits. There are accounting experts believe that due to the energy product orders vary greatly, and therefore does not provide a method to its valuation, which gave Enron......

Words: 361 - Pages: 2

Enron Fraud

...Accounting fraud case Halliburton, one of the world's largest providers of products and services in the oil and gas industries, had several lawsuits brought against them and its former CEO, Vice President Dick Cheney. The allegations claim that Halliburton illegally overstated its revenues in order to hide losses the company had experienced because of under estimating costs for construction projects, and a downturn in the oil industry. The claim also states that the company violated U.S. securities laws and defrauded stockholders. Halliburton settled the lawsuits for $7.5 million although the SEC continues its investigation of the accounting allegations. (SEC Charges Halliburton and Two Former Officers for Failure to Disclose a 1998 Change in Accounting Practice) Halliburton accomplished the alleged fraud by making changes in the way it accounted for its costs from its numerous construction projects. Much of Halliburton's business comes from big construction projects, like natural gas processing plants, which sometimes run over budget. The company failed to account for any of the over budget costs. Instead of counting the excess costs as losses, Halliburton began accounting for them as revenues based on the belief that the funds would eventually be paid by the subcontracted firms. Over six reporting periods, spanning approximately 18 months covering 1998 and 1999, Halliburton failed to disclose its change of accounting practice. These lead investors into believing......

Words: 872 - Pages: 4

Enron Case

...Enron Case 10.8.2014 Melissa Becker Boya Du Sidi (Fiona) Chen Wei (David) Yu In June of 2001 Enron’s new CEO, Jeff Skilling, was heralded as the “No. 1 CEO in the entire country and Enron was saluted as “America’s most innovated company.” Just six months later, in December, Enron filed for bankruptcy. The failure shocked the public and angered investors. How could this have happened? Did no one see this coming? Where were the accountants? Where were the controls? Enron’s public troubles began on October 16th of 2001 when management released a third quarter earnings report with a “mysterious $1.2 billion dollar reduction.” The following month the company restated earnings for the previous five years and erased $600 million in profits. It turned out that the October report began to reveal Enron’s gross abuse of special-purpose entities (SPEs) and the mark-to-market accounting method. The company used SPEs to keep enormous amounts of losses off its books while inflating earnings from supply contracts by booking all profits from a contract in the quarter the deal was made. What also became clear was that Enron did not accomplish their gross manipulations without the help from their accountant’s at Arthur Andersen. Enron shareholders and executives were not the only groups negatively affected by Enron’s aggressive accounting practices. Arthur Andersen was also unraveled because of the role it played in Enron’s materially misstated financial statements. In a letter to...

Words: 6730 - Pages: 27

Enron Case

... Enron: What Caused the Ethical Collapse? Introduction  Kenneth Lay, former chairman and chief executive officer (CEO) of Enron Corp., is quoted in Michael Novak’s book Business as a Calling: Work and the Examined Life as saying, “I was fully exposed to not only legal behavior but moral and ethical behavior and what that means from the standpoint of leading organizations and people.” In an introductory statement to the revised Enron Code of Ethics issued in July 2000, Lay wrote: “As officers and employees of Enron Corp., its subsidiaries, and its affiliated companies, we are responsible for conducting the business affairs of the companies in accordance with all applicable laws and in a moral and honest manner.” Lay went on to indicate that the 64-page Enron Code of Ethics reflected policies approved by the company’s board of directors and that the company, which enjoyed a reputation for being fair and honest, was highly respected. Enron’s ethics code also specified that “An employee shall not conduct himself or herself in a manner which directly or indirectly would be detrimental to the best interests of the Company or in a manner which would bring to the employee financial gain separately derived as a direct consequence of his or her employment with the Company.” Enron’s ethics code was based on respect, integrity, communication, and excellence. These values were described as follows: Respect. We treat others as we would like to be treated ourselves. We do......

Words: 2110 - Pages: 9

Enron Case

...EMBA - OT “GLOBAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK & STRATEGIES” INDIVIDUAL PAPER “ ENRON CASE” Name : Suharto NIM : 13262051 “ Analyze Enron’s Case as PTCV according to the 5 Theory in and Relation to Act no 40/2007” Executive Summary Piercing the corporate veil is the judicial act of imposing personal liability on otherwise immune corporate officers, directors, and shareholders for the corporation’s wrongful act (Black Law Dictionary). In other words, courts may pierce the "veil" that the law uses to divide the corporation (and its liabilities and assets) from the people behind the corporation. The veil creates a separate, legally recognized corporate entity and shields the people behind the corporation from personal liability. In Enron Case , mulltiple corporate governance mechanisms, both internal and external, failed to constrain the actions of Enron's management team: • In particular, Enron's board failed to oversee management and apparently did not understand the risks inherent in the firm's business strategy. • It also appears that several board members and the external auditor faced potential conflicts of interest that attenuated their role as monitors. • Further, the board, analysts (credit and equity), external auditors, and federal agencies failed to identify problems at Enron or did not respond to obvious signs that there were problems at the firm. • Finally, Enron's role as a dominant player in nascent and inefficient markets, afforded the firm's management the opportunity......

Words: 1846 - Pages: 8

Enron Case

...Enron Case The internal controls that were ignored when LJM1 was created were one, LJM’s books were kept separate from Enron's. LJM1 ignored some of Enron’s entries in the books that were missing. Outsiders owned less than 3% of the Special Purpose Entities equities. There was an error made by Arthur Andersen to let LJM’s financial statement to remain unconsolidated. If the financial statements had been consolidated, some of the errors could have been found. They may have even had some time to correct these errors before that had gotten so far out of control. There was not governing controls in place and fraudulent activities were unlimited. Andrew Fastow created LJM1 to handle investments with Rhythms NetConnections, high-speed Internet service provider. The stock that they bought at $10 million was worth $300 million after a year. Enron tried to sell the stocks to an investor, in case the stock price dropped. They could not find an investor to purchase the stock at the put option because of the risks that was involved. This is a clear violation as it created a scenario where Enron was basically insuring itself, and therefore, without insurance Enron's harsh performance review could have significantly aided their company, because the performance review was so strict that if someone was not performing in a given period of time, they would indicate a poor rating to that employee and fire them. Enron harsh performance review committee aided company executives in committing......

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Enron Case

...Perspectives on Accounting Education Volume 3, 2006, 27-48 ENRON AND ARTHUR ANDERSEN: THE CASE OF THE CROOKED E AND THE FALLEN A Gary M. Cunningham Visiting Professor Department of Business Administration Åbo Akademi University Turku, Finland Jean E. Harris Accounting Department Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg Campus School of Business Administration Middletown, Pennsylvania USA ABSTRACT Outside the US, the failures of Enron and Arthur Andersen remain puzzles. How could the accounting and audit failures associated with Enron and Arthur Andersen happen in the US where auditing is sophisticated, accounting principles are strong, and disclosure is emphasized? This is a teaching case for persons outside the US to review the financial reporting and auditing issues related to Enron and to explain the regulation of accounting and auditing in the US. It has broad implications for corporate governance and accounting regulation in other countries as well. n the years after the Enron Corporation declared bankruptcy in 2001 and Arthur Andersen failed in 2002, people are still asking, especially those outside the US, how could this happen? What went wrong? The US has a well-developed set of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) that requires extensive disclosures in audited financial statements, and a well-established federal agency, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that monitors financial reporting. This case is written for accounting students and......

Words: 9861 - Pages: 40

The Enron Fraud

...The Enron Fraud Enron Corporation was a conventional energy company founded in 1985, but soon expanded its operations as an energy trader of derivatives contracts, taking advantage of the deregulation of the energy markets. It also built and operated a variety of assets across the globe, including pipelines, electricity plants, pulp and paper plants, water plants, and broadband services; and provided financial and risk management services to customers worldwide. Enron soon became a world-renowned company and it was labeled as the most innovative company in the U.S. for six consecutive years between 1996 and 2001 by Fortune magazine. It was ranked the sixth largest energy company in the world in 2000, with close to 22,000 employees and nearly $101 billion in revenues. But in 2001 the company’s reputation began to fall following rumors of bribery to obtain contracts in different parts of the world. Likewise, fraudulent accounting techniques, which were supported by its external auditing firm Arthur Andersen, allowed the company to create the largest corporate scam know in U.S. history until then (McLean, 2008). Enron’s fraud consisted of, what its CEO called, creative accounting: off-balance-sheet items, complex financing structures, and deals so bewildering that made financial statements misleading and difficult for the stakeholders to understand, deceiving the main objective of financial reporting which is “to provide financial information about the reporting......

Words: 1030 - Pages: 5

Enron Case

...Quindo, Rizalyn F. BSA IV-A 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. –Audit of financial statements –Inspection of accounting procedures –Professional consultancy in tax and other accounting procedures In the audit of financial statements, there are greater risks, given that one wrong accounting procedure can place the company into trouble and can also result in bankruptcy. Manipulations of these data are likely to show up when it is audited with reasonable assurance and with more precision. When it comes to inspection of accounting procedures, there are certain threats, given the decision that matter. Hence, inspection of accounting procedures makes it more treatable in case of errors that can impact the company and audit client. But the threat of SPEs (special purpose entities) displays some manipulation from the part of the audit firm that also with prior knowledge of accounting ethics, which at most times makes it more risky, given the legal involvement. Lastly, manipulations are also likely to occur as the biggest threat in the audit consultancy services. So, professional ethics are likely to arise. Hence, self-governance is largely a matter that can pose greater risk. When it matters to preparation and retention of audit work paper, the requirement prepare by auditor should be in a manner that it helps the auditors to carry out auditing services in the most appropriate way. Hence the working paper requirement at most should avoid accumulating......

Words: 860 - Pages: 4

Enron Case

...| | | Weighted Average Cost of Capital | 9%-12% | *Red flag because ROIC is not 3%-5% higher than WACC. | Fraud Models Quality of Earnings | 4.8815 | *Although there were large fluctuations in the quality of earnings ratio year after year, this is not considered a red flag for the year 2000. | | | | Quality of Revenues | 0.9269 | *This ratio indicates a red flag because it is less than 1. This indicates improper revenue recognition and could signal that a company is trying to cover things up. Enron was trying to cover up debt that was being called. | Sloan Accrual Measure | 0.029 | | | | | *The Sloan accrual indicates a red flag because it comes out to be more than 0.10. This makes sense for Enron since this ratio is indicative that a company may have a drop in future stock price. The ratio calculates how much of the company’s income is not stemming from operations. | | Altman Z-Score | X1 | | 0.030151 | | X2 | | 0.04925 | | X3 | | 0.037891 | | X4 | | 0.212278 | | X5 | | 1.538693 | | Z-Score | | 1.896232 | *The Altman Z-Score has inconclusive results. The score is very close to 1.8 which would indicate that the company is not at a high risk of bankruptcy. | | | | Z-Score (Old Fraud Model) | Z-Score 0.05391 | *This is a red flag because Enron’s Z-Score is higher than the cutoff of -1.99. Red Flag Summary: Based on the above ratios, it is very obvious that there were many red flags that could have been identified......

Words: 2046 - Pages: 9

Enron Summary

...Enron Summary In the documentary Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room, we get an in-depth look into how greed and the lust for power led to the rise and ultimate downfall of Enron. Starting in 1985 as a merger of two oil companies, Enron experienced astronomical growth behind the leadership of its CEO, Ken Lay, and executives Jeff Skilling and Andy Fastow. However, this growth did not come from hard work alone, as the film details some of the underhanded tactics used by Enron to become one of the largest companies in America. Lay, Skilling, and Fastow created an environment where all that mattered was the bottom line, meaning that anything was in the realm of possibility (no matter how despicable) as long as it brought hefty returns for the company. There were many lessons to be learned from Enron. First off, we learn a great deal about the psyche, and how certain primal urges can cause us humans to do things that would at first glance seem appalling. Also, the importance of company culture and corporate ethics is revealed throughout this film. There was a great deal of negative energy permeating throughout Enron that made it nearly impossible for them to sustain their upward trajectory. By no means should Enron’s leadership be let off the hook for what they did, but it is important to understand what motivated them to act in such a way. Early in the film, we get a little background information on the company’s leaders. Lay grew up in poverty and learned the value of hard...

Words: 818 - Pages: 4

Enron Case

...ENRON CASE Please read the Enron cases posted on blackboard and the one in your book then answer the following questions based upon the case and Chapter 9. Make sure that your answers are supported by the facts of the case and the concepts you learned from Chapter 5. Please rely only on the case/chapter 9 to answer the questions except for question # 12—requires outside search. Make sure your answers are sufficiently brief, concise, and relevant to the question. Please avoid general, round, and long statements based upon speculations. “Briefly explain” means an explanation requiring 2-5 sentence elaboration of the topic in hand. This is an independent and individual project that should be done by each individual student alone. Any extensive similarities and consistent patterns among students will result in a grade of zero for any student involved in the situation. If you need assistance I should be the source to answer any questions and respond to any concerns regarding the case. It is also not acceptable that the student plagiarizes through internet sources, written documents and reports of others, and etc. Any outside source should be correctly cited with a reference. Each case will be electronically submitted to Safe Assignments on blackboard (Go to assignments tab, click on create assessment, pick safe assignment from the drop down menu and upload your case there). Due date is Thursday Nov 29, 2011. Please bring a hard-copy to the class...

Words: 1893 - Pages: 8