Hutchison Whampoa Ltd Case Summary

In: Business and Management

Submitted By wenjun0617
Words 1167
Pages 5
HUTCHISON WHAMPOA'S FINANCING STRATEGY PRIOR TO JUNE 1997
A financing strategy is integral to an organization’s strategic plan. It sets out how the organization plans to finance its overall operations to meet its objectives now and in the future. Hutchison, like other large firms in Hong Kong, relied heavily on internally generated funds to fuel growth. Having reserves of 67,994m (more than twiceof operating expenses in 1996), it is stable enough to continue without external funding, indicating a conservative financing strategy.
Debt ratios for 1995 & 1996 are 46% and 42% respectively, showing HWL’s relatively medium dependency on debt . With approximate interest coverage ratio of 4.96 and an A3/A+ credit rating from Moody’s and S&P respectively, HWL was considered to have a relatively low default risk.
As stated in the case, HWL had “drawn on short-and medium-term loan facilities underwritten by banking syndicates for external financing”. Prior to June 1997, the longest debt maturity HWL had offered was 9 years including subsidiary loans. Looking at HWL’s long term liabilities in 1996, 69.5% of its loans are repayable in 5 years which further indicates the firm’s strategy of borrowing without long term obligations to maintain liquidity and flexibility.
There is a net cash outflow of 5,486 compared to cash inflow of 3,950 – this was mainly due to the increase in purchase of and advances to associated companies, additions to managed funds and other investments, and purchase of fixed assets. This was in line with the firm’s overall strategy of expanding its core businesses and their market shares in Asia. However, the negative cash flow may be a sign that current financing policy is not sufficient for future growth. As such, HWL now wanted to long-term financing with lower interest rates.
In summary, Hutchison Whampoa’s financing strategies were to rely…...

Similar Documents

Lesse Ltd Case

...Lessee Ltd. Lessee Ltd., a British company that applies IFRSs, leased equipment from Lessor Inc. on January 1, 2007, for a period of three years. Lease payments of $100,000 are due to Lessor Inc. each year. Other expenses (e.g., insurance, taxes, maintenance) are also to be paid by Lessee Ltd. and amount to $2,000 per year. The lessor did not incur any initial direct costs. The lease contains no purchase or renewal options and the equipment reverts back to Lessor Inc. on the expiration of the lease. The remaining useful life of the equipment is four years. The fair value of the equipment at lease inception is $265,000. Lessee Ltd. has guaranteed $20,000 as the residual value at the end of the lease term. The $20,000 represents the expected value of the leased equipment to the lessee at the end of the lease term. The salvage value of the equipment is expected to be $2,000 after the end of its economic life. The lessee’s incremental borrowing rate is 11 percent (Lessor’s implicit rate is 10 percent and is calculable by the lessee from the lease agreement). The junior accountant of Lessee Ltd. analyzed the assets under lease and prepared a computation. The senior accountant of Lessee Ltd. reviewed the analysis and the computation and prepared a separate analysis. As the finance controller, you were given both of the computations to determine the correct accounting treatment. Calculations and journal entries performed by your junior and senior accountant are......

Words: 595 - Pages: 3

Case Summaries

...this time the parties had already spent some £51,000 on the venture. Common ground that the whole of this expenditure was incured in the course of the venture with the agreement and authority of all four parties. The judge found they had held themselves out as partners, jointly entered into all these activities together, agreed upon the division of their tasks, and had “so far advanced towards the establishment of such a restaurant as, in my judgement, properly to be described as having entered upon the trade of running a restaurant, albeit that it was yet to open and in the event was not opened for a further two months or slightly more.” Issue: Whether the act was done in relation to the partnership business s8(1) Mercantile Credit Co Ltd v Garrod 1962 Two people were in partnership in a business which leased out garages. In their agreement, both were prohibited from selling motor vehicles Despite prohibition, one partner Parkin sold to the plaintiff (Mercantile credit) a motor vehicle which he did not own – in fact he had sold other vehicles to the plaintiff in the past. Mercantile Credit the plaintiff sued partnership and recovered damages. Garrod argued Parkin had no actual or ostensible authority as selling of vehicles not “business of the kind carried on by the firm” Held: Court looked at the transaction as it would have appeared to the plaintiff and concluded that from the plaintiff point of view the sale was in the usual course of business Garrod was......

Words: 3319 - Pages: 14

Case Summary

...Dawei Chen Case Summary- Confucius, Machiavelli, and Rousseau According to the Case context, we can find out many ideas about leadership. First, from the great Chinese ancient philosopher-Confucius that we can learn that a phenomenal leader needs to love people and use virtue to rule a society. The ultimate goal for a leader is to fulfill everyone’s demand. In order to achieve this goal; a leader must be a sage or at least a very wise man to set up a very extraordinary example for others to learn. However, this opinion has a very obvious flaw that people cannot be as good as he think and most people are selfish that this kind of leadership is not going to be successful. Second, From the Machiavelli, we can acquire the idea which is almost opposite from Confucius, in his eyes, people has variable characters and most people are wicked. They are selfish and the only way to rule them is to treat them like objects. To achieve this goal, most leaders need to use the power of government and use many different strategies to control his followers such as military forces and spies. The core of his theory is to make fear in people’s mind and use this fear to set up the leadership and leaders can observe other leaders to make this happen. Third, case describes the great thinker in revolution era- Rousseau. He established the basic ideas of democracy. The core idea of his “The Social Contract “is to gather the “general will” and make the general will into a contract that is the...

Words: 657 - Pages: 3

Case Study Rochem Ltd

... the Chemling’s machine total cost per unit is by £7.17 higher. 2. Evaluating the two alternative technologies according to their features and the long term valuation, the new Chemling is manual testing unlike AFU that is automatically testing. Also, the delivery for the AFU is immediate and tree months for the Chemling. So the AFU is more feasible. The AFU technology is how all future similar technologies will be. By the acceptability of the technology the company will improve the competitiveness and will give a return on investment as well as adding to the resource base. In the end, any manufacturing operation has to bear in mind that, the unit cost of the product is a critical factor in measuring performance. In the case of the Rochem Ltd, the Chemling’s machine total cost per unit is by £7.17 higher. So, as a long term investment the AFU is more profitable. 3. The recommendation for the company is to buy the AFU because: I. Of the immediate delivery, so the new production will be directly available. II. The testing is automatically. III. The production is higher. IV. The production cost is lower. V. The AFU is a modernized machine and the company will be able to adapt in the new technologies and market requirements. Another solution is to fix the old Chemling machine, in order to save money, time and the workers will be satisfied. Replacing the older machine with a substantially better one would entail a much greater cost more than £590,000 and......

Words: 451 - Pages: 2

Weekly 2 Reflection Summary Ltd

...Week l1 Reflection Summary – Week 2 Learning Team Assignment In Week 1, we learned about how technology has changed the work and home environment. We discussed how the environment has changed from 40 years ago to one year ago. From computers to phones to entering a building, technology has evolved tremendously over the years. Due to this evolution of technology companies are constantly modifying processes and procedures to keep up with the advancement of technology. Home life also changed from televisions to phone - the more advanced technology becomes the more advanced people have to become with devices. We also discussed the order of importance and we realized the order of speed, availability, accuracy and consistency is based on the individuals’ need and on the system that they are working in. Support was also suggested to be part of the benefits list because without support and they are issues in the system it would be impossible to have any of the benefits at all. We also discussed working remotely using virtual private network (VPN). The benefits of VPN and how it can assist companies with having individuals work outside of the office. Along with VPN, disaster recovery plans were also discussed and how they can benefit a company to have one in place in the case of a disaster. Our assignment last week was based on acts and how being technically advanced can have an effect of acts. Acts are created to put a “law” into place for situations that can occur...

Words: 284 - Pages: 2

Case Study : Macville Pte Ltd

...| |Cornerstone Investment Aust. Pty Ltd ACN 082 383 640 | | |Australian Institute of Commerce & Language | | |Level 9, 815-825 George Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Australia | | |Telephone: + 61 2 8917-6800 Facsimile: + 61 2 9212-0069 | | |Web: www.aicl.nsw.edu.au E-mail: info@aicl.nsw.edu.au | | |RTO ID: 5500 CRICOS Provider number: 02048A | |Assessment Details | |Qualification |Diploma of Business |Term | | |AICL Subject Code |DBB07 |AICL Subject Name |Manage Risk | |Assessment Type |Case Study |Time allowed | ...

Words: 3275 - Pages: 14

Environinvest Ltd Case Study

...Introduction This case study is based on Environinvest Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(in liquidation) vs Roger Neil Pescott & Ors (2012) and Environinvest Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liquidation) vs Blackburne Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (2012). Environinvest Ltd was a corporation that manages investment schemes in the field of agriculture (Bloomberg Businessweek, 2014). The corporation was responsible in developing various agriculture investments under the care of agriculture specialist, such as eucalypt plantations and hydroponic tomatoes (Korda Mentha, 2014). Investors would invest in these schemes in order to receive tax deductions (Lonie, 2009). In 2008, the corporation was voted into liquidation. The Court and the Judge The court that handed down the decision of the case was the Supreme Court of Victoria in the commercial and equity division commercial court located in Melbourne. The judge that decided the case was Judge Ferguson J and he made his judgment on 26th April 2012. Facts of the Case The main purpose of this case was an application to amend pleading or the proposed pleading of the plaintiffs towards the defendants upon the allegations that had been drawn up to them. This case is between Environinvest Ltd versus their former directors, members of the Pescott family and associated companies that are owned by the Pescott members and associates. There are two types of proceedings in this case, the Properties Proceeding and...

Words: 2789 - Pages: 12

Case Summary

...claims and judicial resolution of legal cases. Your ability to achieve these objectives will be evaluated by your performance on the case briefs, class discussions, and an excruciatingly final examination. TEXTBOOK: The textbook is Cheeseman, Business Law: Legal Environment, Online Commerce, Business Ethics, and International Issues, 8th ed. (ISBN 978-0-13-289041-0). COURSE ASSIGNMENTS: (1) You must turn in a case brief (i.e., a one-page “executive summary”) each week from Meeting #2 through Meeting #14, inclusive; (2) Lead (when designated by instructor) and participate in weekly class discussions of the cases; and (3) Take an excruciatingly difficult final exam. Each brief must be done in the style and format described at pp. 5-9, below, with the following modifications: a brief may not exceed 1 page, with one-inch margins all the way around, at least 1.5 spacing, and at least 10-point font. To earn an “A,” logic, clarity, cogency, and interest must be evident. An “A” paper must be neatly typed, with virtually no errors in grammar, spelling, and style. A “B” paper will be well-written but will lack the “spark” of an “A” paper and may contain errors. A “C” paper will contain errors and be poorly written and/or organized. Lower grades are awarded for sub-standard papers. Late papers will be penalized according to the following formula: [(awarded points)(.97n)], where “n” = number of days late. You may work together to analyze and brief the cases, but each brief must be......

Words: 1642 - Pages: 7

Lesse Ltd Case

...Patrick Killeavy 6/4/2015 ACCT 7116 Lessee Ltd. INTRODUCTION: Lessee Ltd. is a British company that applies IFRS for financial reporting purposes. On January 1, 2013, Lessee Ltd. leased equipment from Lessor Inc. The lease term covers a period of three years and reverts back to the lessor at the end of three years. The lease costs consist of $100,000 annual rental payments as well as $2000 of annual expenses that relate to insurance, maintenance, and taxes. The equipment has a 4 year useful life, $265,000 fair value, $20,000 guaranteed residual value, and $2000 salvage value. According to IFRS IAS 17, a lease can either be classified as a finance lease or as an operating lease. Lessee Ltd. has several concerns about the classification of the lease and whether to use the 10% implicit rate in the lease or the 11% incremental borrowing rate. As a result, both a junior and senior accountant of Lessee Ltd. provided an analysis discussing whether the lease was an operating or capital lease and each prepared the applicable journal entries. Was the junior accountant's analysis correct?: According to the junior accountant, the lease should be classified as an operating lease because the equipment reverts back to the lessor. The accountant believed that the proper annual journal entry consists of debiting legal expense of $100,000, insurance expense of $2000, and crediting cash of $102,000. According to IFRS IAS 17.10 "Whether a lease is a finance lease......

Words: 1837 - Pages: 8

Case Summary on Momentum Group Limited V African Life Health (Pty) Ltd (Cac)

...  The Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“the Act”) was used as reference Caption: Momentum Group Limited v African Life Health (Pty) Ltd (CAC) 58/CAC/Dec05 Heard in the Competition Appeal Court Decided 14 February 2006. Judgment written by Malan AJA. Davis JP and Mailula AJA concurring. Facts: This case dealt with the review and appeal of the decision of the Competition Tribunal. The applicants in the case are Momentum Group Limited (“MGL”) and two non-executive directors, L. Dippenaar and J Burger, who are the CEO and CFO of First Rand Limited (“FRL”), respectively. The Chairperson of the Competition Tribunal, the Acting Commissioner of the Competition Commission and African Life Health (Pty) Ltd (“ALH”) were respondents. The case concerned a large merger between MGL and ALH, MGL being the acquiring firm and ALH the target firm. The Competition Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) raised concern about the dual directorship held at operating and holding company level between the acquiring firm, MGL, and its parent firm, FRL, and one of FRL’s subsidiary’s, Discovery Holdings. FRL holds 65.6% shares in Discovery and wholly owns MGL. MGL and ALH operate in the medical scheme administration sector. The Competition Commission recommended that the merger be approved unconditionally after which it was referred to the Tribunal in terms of s 14A of the Act for approval. The Tribunal imposed a condition on the merger that prohibited cross directorship between Discovery and MGL.......

Words: 1486 - Pages: 6

Amp Ltd Case Study

...|DETAILS OF ASSIGNMENT | | |STUDENT NAMES: |IDS: | |Adam Carlyon |9948252 | |UNIT CODE * NAME |LMC 501B | |ASSESSMENT TITLE |Assessment Task 2 – Case Study – Part 2 | |TUTOR’S NAME: |Terry Landells |DATE OF SUBMISSION: |22/04/2013 | | | | |DECLARATION | | |We declare that ( the first four boxes must be completed for the assignment to be accepted): | |□ This assignment......

Words: 1532 - Pages: 7

Abc Ltd Case Study

...Case Study: ABC Learning Background ABC Developmental Learning Centres was founded in 1988. ABC rapidly expanded, reaching 43 childcare centres by June 30, 2001. By November 2005, it had 697 Early Childhood Education centres throughout Australia and New Zealand. In March 2006, it forecast that would have 950 centres in Australia and New Zealand by June 30, 2006. It was a highly profitable company in the 2004/5 financial year, recording net profit after tax of $52.3 million from total revenues of $292.7 million. The six months ending 31 December 2005 showed no slowing in the financial momentum for the company with profit after tax reaching $38 million and revenues of $219.8 million. Trading in ABC Learning shares was suspended in August 2008 after the company failed to release its earnings for the 2007-08 financial year. Despite selling off assets, the company fell into receivership in November 2008 after increasing debt servicing obligations and its auditors were unable to sign off on its accounts. The federal government injected $22 million into the company to keep its childcare centers open until the end of 2008. The company was subsequently delisted. Creditors voted to wind up the company in June 2010. ‘Lessons to be learnt from ABC Learning's collapse’ Colin Kruger January 2, 2009 Dr Philip Ross, the head of the school of accounting at the University of Western Sydney, describes it as a "failure of regulatory and accounting processes" and says that despite...

Words: 543 - Pages: 3

Case Summary

...aExecutive Summary The case gives an idea about how the competition influenced Jollibee's strategy, both domestic and international. Jollibee ,which was a Filipino chain of restaurants, was forced to change their strategy with the entry of McDonalds in Philippines, which later transformed the company into a global company .The company faced serious challenges with their international exposure. The challenges included the conflicts with franchisees/Joint venture and conflicts between divisions. Another issue that the company faced was the entry into Papa New Guinea, United States of America and expansion plans in Hong Kong. The company has to consider the financial instability it faces while considering their plans. In the analysis we have tried to cover the effectiveness of strategies adopted by Mr Tony Kitchner (Former International Division head). This case analysis report deals with, firstly the key management challenges faced by the company, followed by some supporting arguments. In the management issues, the report focuses into the conflicting areas or the need to establish a greater cooperation and coordination between the Domestic and International divisions. Then, the recommendations regarding what should the company do differently in each of its department like in Marketing, HR, Finance or Operations, to succeed in its plans of global expansion. Finally, the feasibility of the three decisions that the new management has taken is also discussed. We have also tried...

Words: 6626 - Pages: 27

Case Summary

...Extended case study Australian Beverages Ltd—Pre-seen case study information A - Introduction to Australian Beverages Ltd - 1937, Australian Beverages Ltd (ABL) commenced manufacturing soft drinks [non-alcoholic drinks rather than ‘hard’ drinks that contain alcohol]. - 1970s and 1980s, the company expanded beverage portfolio by entering into other non-alcoholic beverage categories, such as fruit- and milkbased drinks. - 2011, the company was Australia’s largest supplier of non-alcoholic beverages. - -Tom Dwyer, current Managing Director since 2008. - Joined the company at a time when carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) growth was stagnating and shareholder confidence in the company was waning. - Dwyer established a strategic planning team to assess the current product portfolio and identify organic and acquisition growth opportunities. - From this review the importance of operational excellence was identified - Strong investment was made in world-class manufacturing facilities and systems. - Process re-engineering was implemented to reduce the costs of manufacturing and time-to-market. - Given the declining consumption of CSDs, Tom Dwyer has sought to reduce ABL’s reliance on them, focusing on growing new products and entering new non-alcoholic beverage Categories. - Significant investment in product development of other non-alcoholic beverages - Several acquisitions made to grow the market share of non-CSD based beverages in the company’s......

Words: 6430 - Pages: 26

Dorchester Ltd Mini Case

...Dorchester Ltd is a famous high-quality chocolate maker based in the United Kingdom. Through its facilities in the United Kingdom, Dorchester manufactures candies that it sells throughout Western Europe and North America (United States and Canada). Dorchester has been struggling with supplying the United States with their demand of 390,000 pounds (with 5% annual growth rate) of candies. Due to limited production capacity, only 65,000 pounds per year of candies are supplied throughout that region. The company deems that an additional manufacturing facility situated in the U.S would easily supply Dorchester’s product throughout the entire U.S. market and Canada. The current spot exchange rate is US$1.50/GBP, while the U.S is predicting a 3% inflation rate and 5% for the U.K. Dorchester’s expansion possibility to the United States will cost them US$7,000,000 to build a factory. This would allow Dorchester to fulfill all 390,000 pounds expected demand and its profit per pound would increase from US$4.305 to US4.400. The factory has planned to operate for seven years, at that time, the United States Internal Revenue Service considers the factory fully depreciated with straight-line depreciation, but Dorchester’s management suggests that the remaining equipment can be sold for US$2,000,000. Should Dorchester choose to invest in the new U.S factory, they plan to pay it off with a combination of equity capital and debt. The company would borrow at most £2,000,000......

Words: 575 - Pages: 3