Jdcw

In: Business and Management

Submitted By katepsn
Words 1761
Pages 8
The following report is a consultation analysis of John Deere Component Works costing structure. Included is a discussion of the existing cost system as well as a comparison with the proposal of the Activity Based Costing system. The solutions to the required discussion issues have been thoroughly prepared and are hereby included.

Problem Statement:

The demand for John Deere Component Work’s (JDCW’s) products has suffered due to the collapse of farmland value and commodity prices. A number of continuous failures in JDCW’s competition for bids have placed an onus upon management to question its current costing methods. As a result, an analysis must be made regarding the current costing methods in order to determine their validity and to aid the company in adopting a more sound costing system.

Analysis

John Deere Component Works was a subdivision of John Deere and Company which dealt exclusively with the manufacturing of tractor component parts. By the mid 1980’s, JDCW found that its available excess capacity was increasing. To neutralize this problem JDCW attempted to take advantage of the efficiencies of its newly acquired automatic turning machines by bidding on parts offered from within the company. This lead to a direct bid of 275 of the 635 parts offered by John Deere and Company. Out of the possible 275 parts, JDCW was successful in the bidding of only 58 parts, which happened to be low volume parts. This became a concern for JDCW because its aim was to attain the bids that offered the higher volume parts, as to allow it to take advantage of its machine’s high volume efficiency. In reality, the problem for JDCW was not the number of bids they received, but the alarming discrepancy within its bid prices and that of its competitors. JDCW realized that something was wrong in their accounting system, and decided to review its…...

Similar Documents

John Deere & Company

...farmers were in a position to buy new equipment, and resale of repossessed equipment further reduced the market for new equipment. Due to this, Deere adjusted its level of operations downward, cut costs where possible, increased emphasis on pushing decision making downward, and restructured manufacturing processes. Deere wanted its captive component divisions to supply other companies and industries to add production volume. However, nearly all of John Deere Component Works (JDCW) sales were internal. Deere equipment producing factories were required to buy internally major components that gave Deere a competitive advantage. Corporate policy specified that transfers between divisions would take place at full cost. Corporate also had a make-buy policy that when excess capacity was available, buying divisions should compare component division’s direct costs, rather than full costs, to outside bids. In practice, equipment divisions did not always follow the corporate guidelines for internal sourcing, and JDCW lost a portion of the equipment factories’ business to outside venders. Initial efforts to gain outside business soon made it clear that competing in the external market was going to be harder than expected. Competition came in two forms which included captive producers of other vertically integrated companies, and independent machine shops. The latter had sprung up around geographical clusters of end users. The key to successful competition in the outside market was......

Words: 1439 - Pages: 6

Jdcw Case

... Analysis John Deere Component Works was a subdivision of John Deere and Company which dealt exclusively with the manufacturing of tractor component parts. By the mid 1980’s, JDCW found that its available excess capacity was increasing. To neutralize this problem JDCW attempted to take advantage of the efficiencies of its newly acquired automatic turning machines by bidding on parts offered from within the company. This lead to a direct bid of 275 of the 635 parts offered by John Deere and Company. Out of the possible 275 parts, JDCW was successful in the bidding of only 58 parts, which happened to be low volume parts. This became a concern for JDCW because its aim was to attain the bids that offered the higher volume parts, as to allow it to take advantage of its machine’s high volume efficiency. In reality, the problem for JDCW was not the number of bids they received, but the alarming discrepancy within its bid prices and that of its competitors. JDCW realized that something was wrong in their accounting system, and decided to review its current cost structures. The existing cost system is strong in that it is simple and easy to maintain. Overhead allocation was based on direct labor hours, machine hours and material dollars. The use of standard costs allows JDCW to compare actual labor overhead costs with budgeted rates in order to determine the following years’ overhead costs. In fact, the old cost structure worked quite well in the past since the...

Words: 1762 - Pages: 8

John Deere

...system. Analysis John Deere Component Works was a subdivision of John Deere and Company which dealt exclusively with the manufacturing of tractor component parts. By the mid 1980’s, JDCW found that its available excess capacity was increasing. To neutralize this problem JDCW attempted to take advantage of the efficiencies of its newly acquired automatic turning machines by bidding on parts offered from within the company. This lead to a direct bid of 275 of the 635 parts offered by John Deere and Company. Out of the possible 275 parts, JDCW was successful in the bidding of only 58 parts, which happened to be low volume parts. This became a concern for JDCW because its aim was to attain the bids that offered the higher volume parts, as to allow it to take advantage of its machine’s high volume efficiency. In reality, the problem for JDCW was not the number of bids they received, but the alarming discrepancy within its bid prices and that of its competitors. JDCW realized that something was wrong in their accounting system, and decided to review its current cost structures. The existing cost system is strong in that it is simple and easy to maintain. Overhead allocation was based on direct labor hours, machine hours and material dollars. The use of standard costs allows JDCW to compare actual labor overhead costs with budgeted rates in order to determine the following years’ overhead costs. In fact, the old cost structure worked quite well in the past since......

Words: 1761 - Pages: 8

John Deree

...untuk karyawan yang keluar dari perusahaan. Untuk menghasilkan tempat produksi yang lebih luas, pada tahun 1970an, Deere berhasil split off parts of tractor production. Pada tahun 1983, John Deere Component Works (JDCW) dibagi menjadi tiga divisi, yaitu The Hydraulics Division, The Drive Trains Division, dan The Gear and Special Products Division. Pembagian tiga divisi ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan operasi perusahaan dan untuk membuat perusahaan lebih efisiensi dalam produksi. Analisis Pada pertengahan tahun 1980, JDCW menemukan bahwa terdapat kelebihan kapasitas. JDCW ingin menawarkan automatic turning machine baru melalui bagian dalam perusahaan untuk mengatasi masalah ini. Hal ini menyebabkan tawaran langsung sebesar 275 dari 635 bagian yang ditawarkan oleh John Deere and Company. Dari 275 bagian, JDCW hanya berhasil mendapatkan penawaran sebanyak 58 bagian yang merupakan jumlah kecil bagian produksi. Hal ini menjadi perhatian JDCW karena pada awalnya tujuan dari perusahaan melakukan penawaran adalah untuk memperoleh penawaran pada bagian produksi dalam jumlah besar untuk mengambil keuntungan. Masalah yang sebenarnya terjadi adalah adanya perbedaan yang mengkhawatirkan dalam harga yang ditawarkan dan harga para pesaingnya sehingga JDCW menyadari badanya kesalahan dalam sistem akuntansi dan memutuskan untuk meninjau metode biaya saat ini. Pengaplikasian metode biaya yang ada adalah sederhana dan mudah. Alokasi overhead didasarkan pada......

Words: 1176 - Pages: 5

John Deere Component

...produk khusus JDCW memutuskan bahwa produk suku cadang mesin yang kompleks menawarkan sesuatu yang menjanjikan. Karena proses ini membutuhkan mesin yang lebih terotomatisasi, akan menambah biaya overhead yang terjadi. Sebagai bagian dari strategi Divisi Gear dan Produk Khusus, suku cadang mesin ini ditetapkan untuk dijual ke pasar luar negeri. Component Works memiliki 120 mesin otomatis yang berbaris dalam empat baris panjang di dalam gedung dengan luas 80.000m2. Mesin ini masing-masing terkait dengan chip dan sistem pendingin pemulihan. Sistem ini dibangun di bawah lantai dan dirancang untuk terus mendinginkan dan melumasi mesin sekaligus mengeluarkan chip limbah dari mesin. Tahun 1984, Divisi Gear dan produk khusus telah mengeluarkan strateginya yaitu memasarkan suku cadang mesin ke pasar luar negeri, untuk mendapatkan keuntungan di pasar luar negeri tersebut. namun persaingan di pasar luar lebih berat daripada yang perkirakan. Kelebihan kapasitas dan dorongan untuk mengembangkan bisnis mandiri memotivasi Divisi Gear dan produk khusus untuk melelang sebanyak 275 dari 635 suku cadang yang Deere dan Perusahaan tawarkan dalam tahun 1984. Mereka segera menemukan, bagaimanapun, bahwa harga penawarannya tidak dapat bersaing dengan para pesaingnya, karena kunci sukses dalam persaingan dunia luar adalah harga. Oleh karena itu JDCW harus memikirkan kembali strategi penetapan harganya. B. Identifikasi Masalah Permintaan untuk produk John Deere Component Works (JDCW) ini......

Words: 1355 - Pages: 6

John Deere Hbr

...A3. Reading through the case study, a few issues caused the cost failure that John Deere Component Works (JDCW) experienced in the 1980s. First, in the 1970s, John Deere spent over $1 Billion in plant modernization, expansion and tooling hoping to meet higher demand levels - profits were rising John Deere began to explore product expansion, which led to the $1 Billion spent on manufacturing plants. Instead, the external factors like falling commodity prices and collapsing farmland values left a demand void - a macro level viewpoint. Internally, JDCW struggled to remain competitive as it produced parts for less than half the tractors it was making in the 1970s. Departments viewed each other as competitors and only looked at price relations rather how well the corporation would act. JDCW failed to keep full costs manageable and outside competition (the $10 JDCW cost against the $7 outside bid example) was able to leverage for a cheaper bid. Parts were made, but too expensive to sell between departments. Also, JDCW was extremely involved and concerned about efficiency (family the parts), but never looked at the individual cost per part. The non-competitive parts used tremendous ACTS hours per hundred parts, which contributed to a high percentage of DL$/Material$ - the huge volume was worthless, because customers were not buying (Exhibit 8). Finally, JDCW’s incentive labor rate of 125% was excessive. The rate hurt the bottomline against the budget allocated to each......

Words: 781 - Pages: 4

Case Study

...John Deere Component Works Background: John Deere Component Works (JDCW), subdivision of John Deere and Co, was in charged specifically of the manufacturing of tractor component parts. The demand for JDCW’s products had problems due to the collapse of farmland value and commodity prices. By the mid 1980’s, JDCW found that the available excess capacity was increasing, it decided to take advantage of the efficiencies of the newly acquired automatic turning machines by bidding on parts offered from within the country. But ultimately, JDCW only bid successfully for 58 parts out of 275 parts, worse still, the 58 parts were all low volume parts, contrary to its aim to attain the bids that offered the higher volume parts. The failure in its competition for bids made management question about its current costing system. As a result, we have to analyze the current costing methods to determine the validity and to help the company adopt a more reasonable costing system. Assignment Questions: Q3: JDCW was established as the subdivision of John Deere Company during the 1970’s when the demand was increasing. JDCW had been structured to be a captive producer of parts for Deere’s equipment divisions, particularly tractors. During the mid 1980’s, the Gear and Special Products Division of JDCW decided that the complex machined parts would make full use of the excess capacity, then more automated machines developed leading to the increased manufacture overhead costs. As a result, the......

Words: 901 - Pages: 4

Jdcw Hbr Case Study

...(A) A.1. How did the competitive environment change for the John Deere Component Works between the 1970's and the 1980's? What information must management accounting systems provide to support effective decision-making in these different environments? The change in the competitive environment greatly influenced JDCW. The early 70s were the end of the post WWII boom period, during which time JDCW was expanding its operations and operating many of its manufacturing plants at capacity. However, there were multiple economic factors in the early 80s that negatively affected the demand for JDCW products. The effect of these economic factors is evidenced in the case study by the fact that during the 1970s JDCW’s operations and equipment had been arranged to support tractor production of 150 units per day and by the mid-1980s, JDCW was producing parts for less than half of that number. One of the reasons for this negative demand shock was the collapse of farmland values and commodity prices. This left farmers with little capital through which they could purchase farming equipment. The collapse of land values had two effects. First, it caused the demand for JDCW equipment to shrink because farmers were no longer aggressively expanding. Secondly, the foreclosure of farms led to an increased supply of repossessed equipment that further reduced the market demand for JDCW’s new equipment. Additionally during this time, the high dollar value reduced U.S exports, which hurt......

Words: 1604 - Pages: 7

Main Assignemnt

...subsequently erroneous strategic decisions. Activity based costing will provide the company with more accurate product costing and is likely to uncover that, contrary to what the management believes, specialty product lines are less profitable than their high-volume counterparts. A comprehensive ABC system is recommended for the company, as it also helps to manage resources by reducing non-value added activities and reporting the cost of spare capacity. Key factors for successful implementation of ABC are behavioral, financial, technological, and organizational and those relating to the system design features. INTRODUCTION John Deere & Company is a manufacturer and supplier of farm equipment products since 1837. John Deere Component Works (JDCW) was a subdivision of John Deere & Company, which dealt exclusively with the manufacturing of tractor component parts; garden product line and other diversified industrial equipment supplies. Despite manufacturing high quality parts & reliable delivery timeline, their main challenge was to keep up with growth in market demand for their products. However in 1980 demand for farm products fell & due to increase in low-cost suppliers in the market, John Deere had to rethink their cost performance strategies for accurate costing and hence pricing. John Deere restructured its manufacturing process & adjusted overhead costs by splitting them into two components – direct labor hours and machine run time. The major cause is an outdated......

Words: 3466 - Pages: 14

Akuntansi Manajemen Lanjutan

...relatif rendah. Selama pertengahan 1980-an JDCW melakukan produksi dengan kapasitas yang rendah karena proses ini diperlukan mesin lebih otomatis dan biaya yang besar harus dikeluarkan untuk proses produksi, tetapi dengan begitu JDCW tetap menawarkan kualitas hasil produksi yang menjanjikan terutama dibagian-bagian suku cadang mesin yang kompleks. Hal itu dilakukan Sebagai bagian dari strategi untuk memasarkan suku cadang hasil produksi mereka di pasar global. Mereka harus segera menemukan solusi bahwa harga yang mereka tawarkan harus bersaing dengan para kompetitior yang lain karena kunci persaingan sukses di pasar global adalah harga, jadi JDCW harus memikirkan kembali strategi penetapan harganya. B. Pernyataan Masalah: Permintaan akan produk John Deere Komponen Work produk (JDCW) semakin berkurang karena runtuhnya nilai lahan pertanian dan harga komoditas. Sejumlah kegagalan terus menerus dialami JDCW, sehingga meminta tanggung jawab pada manajemen untuk mempertanyakan metode biaya saat ini. Akibatnya, analisis harus dibuat tentang metode biaya saat ini untuk menentukan validitas mereka dan untuk membantu perusahaan dalam mengadopsi sistem biaya yang lebih baik. C. Analisis John Deere Komponen Works adalah divisi dari perusahaan John Deere yang khusus menangani pembuatan suku cadang traktor. Pada pertengahan 1980-an, JDCW menemukan adanya kelebihan persediaan yang semakin meningkat. Dalam menetralisir masalah ini JDCW berusaha mengambil keuntungan......

Words: 922 - Pages: 4

Baba

...implementing the ABC system across JDCW will allow operations to run more smoothly and efficiently. However implementing the ABC system alone will not yield the full benefit from the system. Management in the GSP division must utilize the data to make decisions that will result in cost reductions and better product pricing. Therefore we recommend for GSP management to utilize the data from ABC to : 1) Implement layout changes to enjoy cost reductions through activity elimination 2) Improved process planning and cell arrangements to enjoy cost reductions through efficiency 3) Analyze product mix for efficient manufacturing Additionally, we recommend GSP to utilize ABC data to prepare more accurate and competitive bid prices and to extend the ABC system to other operations and to the Hydraulics and Drive Train Divisions. 3 Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 2 2.0 Introduction 4 3.0 Layout Changes 5 3.1 Process Planning 6 3.2 Cell Arrangements 7 3.3 Product Mix : Low Value Added Parts 8 3.4 Bidding 9 3.5 Extending ABC 11 3.0 Conclusion 12 4.0 Reference 13 4 2.0 Introduction John Deere is a US based manufacturing company well-known for the quality of their agricultural machinery. John Deere’s business model encompasses three business activities; the manufacturing of agricultural equipment sold under the John Deere name, the manufacturing of engines and engine parts and the provision of financial services. John Deere Component Works JDCW is a branch of the John......

Words: 2026 - Pages: 9

John Deere Case

...1. What are the Strengths and Weaknesses of the existing cost system at JDCW? The Weaknesses are as given below: • The current costing system followed at JDCW is not effective for individual parts bidding and costing. • The allocated Machine Hours are not supported by the product unit which thus leads to improper allocation of costs. • By using only three overhead rates the current costing system doesn’t calculate the true production costs as the other activities of the production process are not taken into consideration. • The current costing system doesn’t compute material variances which doesn’t honor the accuracy of the costing structure. For more accurate measure, the variance calculations should be included in the weekly report. • The costing system has not been changed or modified since its inception. Initially it was designed for direct labor intensive production process with minimal overhead costs. Now the company has changed its production process to automated system which has increased the overhead costs. The increase in overhead costs is due to more supervision, maintenance etc. • Using the current costing system the JDCW management continually under-costs its low volume parts and over-cost its high volume parts. The Strengths are as given below: • The existing system is strong, simple and easy to maintain. The allocation of overhead is done on the basis of direct labor and direct machine hours. • The existing system was working satisfactorily...

Words: 913 - Pages: 4

John Deer

...system. Analysis John Deere Component Works was a subdivision of John Deere and Company which dealt exclusively with the manufacturing of tractor component parts. By the mid 1980’s, JDCW found that its available excess capacity was increasing. To neutralize this problem JDCW attempted to take advantage of the efficiencies of its newly acquired automatic turning machines by bidding on parts offered from within the company. This lead to a direct bid of 275 of the 635 parts offered by John Deere and Company. Out of the possible 275 parts, JDCW was successful in the bidding of only 58 parts, which happened to be low volume parts. This became a concern for JDCW because its aim was to attain the bids that offered the higher volume parts, as to allow it to take advantage of its machine’s high volume efficiency. In reality, the problem for JDCW was not the number of bids they received, but the alarming discrepancy within its bid prices and that of its competitors. JDCW realized that something was wrong in their accounting system, and decided to review its current cost structures. The existing cost system is strong in that it is simple and easy to maintain. Overhead allocation was based on direct labor hours, machine hours and material dollars. The use of standard costs allows JDCW to compare actual labor overhead costs with budgeted rates in order to determine the following years’ overhead costs. In fact, the old cost structure worked quite well in the past......

Words: 1774 - Pages: 8

Jdcw Cost System

...____________________________________________________________________________ JDCW is facing competition from vertically integrated companies, independent machine shops, limited range of services, internal bidding issue and geographical pricing issues. The importance of identifying and eliminating cost correctly is vital to the success of the company. With the current cost system (Exhibit A), the company uses three overhead rates that creates a large variation in quotes for parts, did not identify the low-volume and low-value parts, relied on past cost without identifying mistakes and established a “normal value” as a long term “through the business cycle” volume. With the ABC cost system (Exhibit B), we address the limitations of the last system being ineffective for costing and bidding individual parts by allocating the cost to 7 activities, establishing overhead rates based on machine size, calculating material cost in order to compare trade off cost, and creating a par value instead of using “normal volume”. In addition, our old system relied on past year’s charges and did not accurately identify potential changes for following years. However, we have identified that products with high direct labor, volume, machine hours are helped by the new system and those with low volume, direct labor and machine hours are hurt. Based on the model we received insight into cost trade-offs among various products (Exhibit C), and determined we should manufacture more......

Words: 401 - Pages: 2

John Deere

... Analysis John Deere Component Works was a subdivision of John Deere and Company which dealt exclusively with the manufacturing of tractor component parts. By the mid 1980’s, JDCW found that its available excess capacity was increasing. To neutralize this problem JDCW attempted to take advantage of the efficiencies of its newly acquired automatic turning machines by bidding on parts offered from within the company. This lead to a direct bid of 275 of the 635 parts offered by John Deere and Company. Out of the possible 275 parts, JDCW was successful in the bidding of only 58 parts, which happened to be low volume parts. This became a concern for JDCW because its aim was to attain the bids that offered the higher volume parts, as to allow it to take advantage of its machine’s high volume efficiency. In reality, the problem for JDCW was not the number of bids they received, but the alarming discrepancy within its bid prices and that of its competitors. JDCW realized that something was wrong in their accounting system, and decided to review its current cost structures. The existing cost system is strong in that it is simple and easy to maintain. Overhead allocation was based on direct labor hours, machine hours and material dollars. The use of standard costs allows JDCW to compare actual labor overhead costs with budgeted rates in order to determine the following years’ overhead costs. In fact, the old cost structure worked quite well in the past since the...

Words: 1761 - Pages: 8