P&G Case

In: Business and Management

Submitted By peter168
Words 3683
Pages 15
P&G Case
Executive Summary
This case study analysis is on the Proctor & Gamble Company (also referred to as “P&G”).
Procter & Gamble is the world's largest producer of household and personal products by revenue, with its products reaching 4 billion people worldwide. The Case Study includes an
Introduction, Company Overview, Company Mandate, Internal Analysis, and External Analysis, followed by various Strategic Options (see below). The author then makes a Final Strategy
Option Recommendation.
Strategic Option #1: Market to Lower-Income Consumers in both Developed and
Emerging Markets (Expand and Build Beauty Segment strictly aimed at Low-Income
Consumers). Industry Consolidator.
Strategic Option #2: Given the maturity of the North American/Western European market, combined with the emerging popularity and demand for Natural/Organic ingredient products,
P&G should look to create New Natural Products and Products tailored to the Male market -
Multiple Segments, not just Skin Care (Expand and Build Beauty Segment). Industry
Consolidator.
Strategic Option #3: Related Diversification through Acquisition.
Strategic Option #4: Joint Ventures in Emerging Markets such as China and India.
Final Strategy Recommendation: The Recommendation is to go for a combined Low-Income segment and New Natural Product strategy as this facilitates P&G’s need to capture a greater slice of the Low-Income consumer market both in Mature and Developing markets, which also capturing a greater slice of the Natural Ingredient market and the growing Men’s Market. Unlike in the case study, the author advocates New Natural Ingredient product development in multiple segments, and not just confined to the Skin Care segment of the Beauty /Feminine Care segment. Such a combined Strategy will require the creation of new products and the expansion of existing ones, combined with…...

Similar Documents

P&G Case

...Australia, New Zealand, India, Pakistan, Philippines, Indonesia, Taiwan, Japan, Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia are all managed by P&G’s Asia-Pacific Regional Headquarters in Hongkong. P&G-Asia’s major brands include Pampers, Always, Head and Shoulders, Rejoice, Oil of Ulan, Clearasil, Camay, Zest and Vicks. One of the P&G subsidiaries in Asia is in Singapore. P&G-Singapore which has 70 staff is headed by a managing director which is also responsible for Malaysian operations. Feminine pads/napkins are one of the products that are being produced by P&G. Always, a brand of feminine pad that was introduced in three lead markets (i.e. U.S., Saudi Arabia & Singapore) in 1983 was an initial success. When introduced in Japan, P&G was blocked from using Always because of trademark reasons. Because of this, the name Whisper was used instead and luckily it was successful. In 1988, competition in the feminine pad market is composed of three major competitors: Kimberly Clark’s Kotex (35% market share) , P&G’s Always (25%) and Kau Laurier (20%). Eight other brands competed for the remaining market share. P&G was the largest market spender in 1989 where it outspent Kotex and Kao five and four times respectively. They spent two thirds of their media budgets in television, one third in print. The three are evenly matched in product line breadth. However, P&G believed that Always was superior in absorption capability, protection and comfort. Other comparisons were as......

Words: 1418 - Pages: 6

P&G Supply Chain

...CASE STUDY December 2002 Procter & Gamble: Building A Smarter Supply Chain Issue/Solution To remain profitable, consumer products manufacturers must find ways to optimize the performance of their supply chains. They need to support marketing promotions better and avoid frustrating consumers with out-of-stock situations in the store. Situation • Procter & Gamble realized it needed a “consumer-driven supply network” to stay ahead in the consumer packaged goods industry. Retailing’s “first moment of truth” is a key focus area for P&G. When the shopper reaches the shelf, is the product there? • Discoveries • • Links between supply chain and CRM processes are critical. Business leads, technology follows. But the technology must be proven, practical and scalable. Even with immature solutions, it is possible to get rapid payback on streamlined demand and fulfillment processes for critical products. A harmonized ERP applications backbone is a basic requirement. • • Recommendations • Secure management support before you start redesigning your supply network. Don’t let politics condemn the initiative to failure. Leverage the value IT can bring in connecting demand and supply side business processes. Simplify your applications architecture to allow collaborative business processes and cope with changes in network alliances. • • Dig Deeper • • • Related Research from GartnerG2 Gartner Core Research Methodology Maria Jimenez with Derek......

Words: 3062 - Pages: 13

P&G Case Study

...Summary Statement/Abstract P&G is a global company that is involved in many different markets including beauty and grooming and household care. The company has been through a lot of change due to the O2005 project that was undertaken in 1999 and saw a complete overhaul of the company during those years. One product that also was involved a lot during that time was the SK-II skin care product which was popular in Japan and a man named de Cesare wanted to take the product global to either the Chinese or European market. However, in order to do this there was a lot of analysis and research which had to be done to determine which market was the best to move the product to and de Cesare had to make a recommendation to the GLT knowing that he must do everything possible to make sure he made the best decision possible. As Paolo DeCesare, what factors do you need to consider before deciding what to recommend in your SK-II presentation to the global leadership team (GLT)? What kind of analysis will you need to do in preparing for that meeting? As Paolo DeCesare there are a lot of factors to consider before deciding what to recommend in the SK-II presentation to the GLT. The biggest factor of course to consider is the profitability of the market or markets that would be chosen to enter in an effort to have SK-II become a global brand within P&G. In order to determine this there is a lot of analysis that goes into determining whether a market will be profitable and could......

Words: 2406 - Pages: 10

Case Study for P & G

...dispersed development teams Speed time-to-market and reduce costs Provide virtual 3D design reviews P RO C T E R & G A M B L E To optimize the effectiveness of distributed product development teams, Procter & Gamble needed a collaborative strategy that included everyone. A geographically dispersed giant Procter & Gamble (P&G) is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of consumer packaged goods. The company markets nearly 300 brands to approximately five billion consumers in more than 160 countries. To address the needs of its worldwide customer base, P&G employs a widely distributed product development strategy. P&G employees at the Cincinnati headquarters collaborate with other P&G personnel and suppliers located all over the world. Their goal: cost effectively create innovative products to improve the lives of consumers globally and introduce them to the market ahead of the competition. Key to making a distributed development strategy successful is a collaboration environment that includes all players. This was difficult to achieve in the past. Although the standard corporate desktop environment included some collaborative tools, it did not support easy sharing of 3D visual product data. Yet this type of data – product and package models, label artwork, equipment, analysis and layout diagrams, process schematics and so on – are vital elements of P&G’s design process. Although P&G had implemented ways to facilitate the sharing of this information among those who......

Words: 936 - Pages: 4

P&G- Scope Case Analysis

...1987 and 1990, worldwide sales for P&G had increased by $8 billion and net earnings by $1.3 billion. This success was due to variety of factors, including the ability to develop truly innovative products to meet consumers’ needs. Of the many products introduced throughout the 3 years, Scope, mouthwash, held 34% of the Canadian mouthwash market. Although there was success, there had been concerns with competition and the major changes happening in the mouthwash market. Up until 1988, most mouthwash was marketed primarily on a “bad-breath” strategy. However, Listerine introduced a plaque and inflamed gums preventing mouthwash. New flavors were introduced by a number of brands and it greatly expanded the market in 1987. In 1988 Colgate launched a mouthwash that included fluoride to fight cavities with a mild taste that encouraged children to rinse longer and more often. Finally, Pfizer launched a “prebrushing” rinse called Plax. Although P&G’s Scope held over 30% of the market share in 1990, they recognized that the industry was changing. The market was indefinitely moving towards healthier alternative. 2. Scope’s performance during the past three years can be considered extremely successful. Although it is marginal, in 1988, Scope’s market share was 33% but by 1990 the percentage fell to 32.3%. During the slim decline, Plax’s market share jumped from 1% to 10% in two years. Therefore, the sudden growth in Plax’s sales should be a concern for P&G’s Scope. 3. There are......

Words: 603 - Pages: 3

P&G Case Study

...dispersed development teams Speed time-to-market and reduce costs Provide virtual 3D design reviews P RO C T E R & G A M B L E To optimize the effectiveness of distributed product development teams, Procter & Gamble needed a collaborative strategy that included everyone. A geographically dispersed giant Procter & Gamble (P&G) is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of consumer packaged goods. The company markets nearly 300 brands to approximately five billion consumers in more than 160 countries. To address the needs of its worldwide customer base, P&G employs a widely distributed product development strategy. P&G employees at the Cincinnati headquarters collaborate with other P&G personnel and suppliers located all over the world. Their goal: cost effectively create innovative products to improve the lives of consumers globally and introduce them to the market ahead of the competition. Key to making a distributed development strategy successful is a collaboration environment that includes all players. This was difficult to achieve in the past. Although the standard corporate desktop environment included some collaborative tools, it did not support easy sharing of 3D visual product data. Yet this type of data – product and package models, label artwork, equipment, analysis and layout diagrams, process schematics and so on – are vital elements of P&G’s design process. Although P&G had implemented ways to facilitate the sharing of this information among those who......

Words: 936 - Pages: 4

P&G Case Study

...The first step taken generally could be stern warning given to the students. Deducting of marks for the assignment can be one of the penalties put against the students, depending on the percentage of similarity checking overlapping with other students or original author’s work. The entire assignment may totally void and no marks given if the contents plagiarism found more than the requirement setting, such as more than 50% of similarity checking. The faculty shall reserve their rights not to allow the students to sit for the subject exam or course exam and more seriously expelled the students if they find the plagiarism cases is extremely heavily committed. 1.5 Prevention of plagiarism Plagiarism is a very serious issue and needs to be handled carefully. There are tips and techniques to prevent plagiarism to occur or at least to minimise the case as much as possible. The faculty and tutors play their roles by providing guidance to the student on the correct format to write their own assignment using sources searched through online or library catalogues. A proper method of In-text Citations, Works Cited Page and the appropriate way to put quotation marks for some quotation made on the assignment to be shared among students. Students should also be exposed on the seriousness of plagiarism and the penalties that will be taken if anyone found involved. Students who involved in plagiarism should be warned and the necessary action to be taken against them. The......

Words: 3285 - Pages: 14

P&G: Sk-Ii

...CASE STUDY ANALYSIS OF P&G: SK-II GLOBALIZATION PROJECT FOR: Professor Howard Kupferman Written by: Andres Torres Procter and Gamble Case Study Analysis Actors: 1. Alan Lafley: Head of P&G Beauty Care GBU 2. Paolo de Cesare: President of Max Factor Japan 3. Durk Jager: P&G CEO 4. GLT: Global Leadership Team (made up of business GM’s of crucial MDO’s, people from R&D, consumer research, product supply, HR, and finance). Chaired by Lafley. INTRO: In this case study we are introduced to P&G as an organization and their changes in structure overtime. More specifically, after the acquisition of Max Factor Japan and success in its SK-II line, questions are raised about whether global expansion is feasible and profitable as a franchise. De Cesare ran this skin-care line in Japan, but he reported directly to Lafley. This is crucial because global expansion would require Lafley’s approval in budgeting and organizational support. P&G recently went through major organizational changes over a period of six years known as O2005. This created huge questions in the strategy that would be put together in the case of a global expansion for SK-II. Within the U.S. Procter & Gamble originally followed an organizational structure consisting of seven different divisions that were furthermore shattered into 26 distinct categories. Each category had its own R&D, supply management and marketing. In addition, the international......

Words: 2346 - Pages: 10

P&G Case Study

...Innovation in Outsourcing: The Case of The Procter & Gamble Company Case Study by the Academic Team from The University of Tennessee, College of Business Administration GEO IAOP’s Global Excellence in Outsourcing Award www.IAOP.org P&G: Taking Innovation to New Levels of Value through Partnership INTRODUCTION Many people believe innovation springs serendipitously from some kind of “aha” moment – literally a bolt out of the blue. P&G knows differently. Innovation has been the corporate lifeblood since P&G’s humble beginning in 1837 when William Procter and James Gamble signed a partnership agreement formalizing The Procter & Gamble Company. Today, P&G’s products touch and improve the lives of over 4.8 billion consumers in 180 countries. Fifty “Leadership Brands” include some of the world’s most well-known household names with 25 of these 50 brands each generating more than $1 billion in annual sales. Simply put, this degree of corporate growth could not be achieved without significant innovation across all aspects of the business even extending to our relationships with suppliers and partners. In 2001, P&G radically changed its approach to Research & Development (R&D). Instead of relying solely on its own, highly capable R&D resources, P&G welcomed ideas from individual entrepreneurs and scientists from other companies, and universities, the concept came to be known as Connect & Develop; the goal was to gain half the ideas from inside and half from outside......

Words: 4003 - Pages: 17

P & G Case

...of the competition. The major issue that concerned Hearst was how P&G should capitalize on the market segment within the rinse category that focused on “health related benefits” rather than Scopes traditional strategy. The constraints that scope has is that they would like to re-position themselves, but they are looked at as a “breath” brand and deterring from that could possibly make them lose out on market share. She is faced with three options to increase sales. They can either do nothing and hope that people with continue to prefer “breath” over “rinse”, they can add a product line extension, or they can add an entirely new product line to the mix. Since 1986, breath only products saw an enormous increase in market shares from 3% in 1986 to 26% in 1987 primarily due to the introduction of flavors in the mouthwash, however, since 1987, there have only been a 3-5% increase of market share. If Gwen does nothing, she may be faced with the market trend of consistently flat sales. Proctor & Gamble pride themselves as being viewed as innovators and market leaders in the packaged goods industry in Canada. If they continue to focus on a segment which is stagnant or a declination of market growth, their sales may decline. In opposition of that is creating a brand extension. This option has been pondered on the most because if the competitors find a way to gain market share in the rinse segment, then P&G shares may decline as consumers become fascinated on the new......

Words: 1020 - Pages: 5

P&G Case Study

...What Lafley brought to the table wasn’t exactly a change in the business processes of P&G, it was more of a change of lifestyle and personality. Jager had come in trying to rip apart the current culture and rebuild it from the ground up in his eyes. What happened was that P&G pushed back at him, and caused an instant revolt that almost tore the company apart. In comes Lafley, who was the complete opposite of Jager’s gruffness. Lafley was more soothing and built his personality around persuading others to buy into his image. He didn’t try to force himself onto the employees, but reassured them that they still had values. Lafley knew that he had to put himself onto the ground level and get people to agree with him on the images that the company needed. He ingeniously did this by sending out memos stressing the core values of P&G and what it stood for. He stressed that the emphasis of P&G was still “ to improve the everyday lives of people around the world with P&G brands and products that deliver better performance, quality, and value. The value system-integrity, trust, ownership, leadership, and a passion for winning: not going to change. The six guiding principles, respect for the individual, all not going to change.” Once he had the people around him accepting him, he began to incorporate his vision. He made it known that his view of “any business doesn’t have a strategy is going to develop one: any business that has a strategy is either going to change it, or improve its......

Words: 1401 - Pages: 6

Scope P&G Case Study

...whereby P&G were loosing market share, and after studying the current situation and making several surveys and market researches, Hearst challenge was to the 1st problem which is to develop strategy that ensures the continued profitability of Scope in face of competitive threats and especially by Plax that gained 10% share of the product category.  So her specific task was to prepare a marketing plan for P&G mouthwash business for the next 3 years. The 2nd problem is how will P&G maintain their profit and make sure that the Scope brand is always the first mouthwash product ranking among consumers?  The mouthwash market is changing everyday with the emergence of new products and product features.  As a result, P&G wants their Scope brand to be the first choice among consumers. In the case of product development, PDD has demonstrated that Scope reduced plaque better than brushing alone because of the antibacterial ingredients in it. So the (Product Development) PDD has recently developed a new pre-brushing rinse product that performed as well as Plax but didn’t work any better than Plax in removing plaque. The key benefit of this recently launched product is that it tastes better than Plax. However, PDD’s preference was to not launch a new product, but instead to add plaque reduction claims to Scope. Since the basic argument was that it is better to protect the business that P&G was already in, than to launch a completely new entry. As for the case of sales...

Words: 812 - Pages: 4

Case Study, P&G

...competitive advantage.”(Lafley, 2008) COLLABORATION AND INNOVATION AT PROCTER & GAMBLE CASE STUDY Prepared by: xxxxxxxxx Lawrence Technical University Management Information Systems, MIS-6013 Professor Patrick Mach Evans February14, 2012 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Analysis 6 Conclusion 16 References 17 Introduction When the typical consumer hears the name Procter and Gamble they might think of Ivory Soap, Tide, Pantene, Pampers, or possibly Swiffer. The reason being is that these are a just a few of the everyday household products that have been contributors to the huge success of Procter and Gamble. But when another consumer product company hears the name Procter and Gamble – they think of innovation, leaders on the cutting edge of technology, and one of the front runners in globalization. Procter and Gamble, also known as P&G, has been a key element of American business for over 150 years. In 1837 a small soap and candle company formed in Cincinnati, Ohio. This little business, named after brother-in-laws, Procter and Gamble, has since grown to a global giant with 138,000 employees working in more than 80 countries. (P&G Revolutionizes Collaboration with Cisco, 2008) P&G is the largest manufacturer of consumer products in the world and one of the top 10 largest companies in the world by market capitalization. (Laudon & Laudon, 2012) p.75. Proctor and Gamble realized strong growth from the mid 1940’s to 2000 on......

Words: 3163 - Pages: 13

P&G Case, Scope

...CASE Procter & Gamble, Inc. Scope As Gwen Hearst looked at the year-end report, she was pleased to see that Scope held a 32 percent share of the Canadian mouthwash market for 1990. She had been concerned about the inroads that Plax, a prebrushing rinse, had made in the market. Since its introduction in 1988, Plax had gained a 10 percent share of the product category and posed a threat to Scope. As brand manager, Hearst planned, developed, and directed the total marketing effort for Scope, Procter & Gamble's (P&G) brand in the mouthwash market. She was responsible for maximizing the market share, volume, and profitability of the brand. Until the entry of Plax, brands in the mouthwash market were positioned around two major benefits: fresh breath and killing germs. Plax was positioned around a new benefit-as a "plaque fighter"-and indications were that other brands, such as Listerine, were going to promote this benefit. The challenge for Hearst was to develop a strategy that would ensure the continued profitability of Scope in the face of these competitive threats. Her specific task was to prepare a marketing plan for P&G's mouthwash business for the next three years. It was early February 1991, and she would be presenting the plan to senior management in March. ■ COMPANY BACKGROUND Based on a philosophy of providing products of superior quality and......

Words: 3308 - Pages: 14

P&G Scope - Case Analysis

...Scope The problem for Procter & Gamble`s (P&G) “Scope” brand is that their share at mouthwash market is slightly going down while a new brand called “Plax” launched by Pfizer Inc. has gained a %10 market share in a very short time period which created a situation that left “P&G”s management team in dilemma for how to respond. P&G has some constraints to solve the problem (in fact, the situation is so complex that for some, no problem and threat exist). First of all, if they introduce a new product in the mouthwash market as a competitor against Plax; they are not sure if it will be really innovative or it will focus on unmet consumer needs. Another limitation is that introducing a new product to the market will cost a lot (even the test production costs $20,000. Capital costs, marketing costs, delivery costs, inventory costs, ingredients costs, packaging costs are other important costs which create concerns) and also will require an effective strategic management. After that, the new product is very similar to Plax and has no significant advantage except a better taste; on the other hand, sales department thinks that for success, the product must be seen as unique. So, P&G can not be sure about the future success of this product. Next, for the new product to gain reassurance, patience is needed. This can only be achieved in the long period. Following this, the new product will also reduce the sales of Scope. Additionally, P&G is not sure about the name of the product......

Words: 646 - Pages: 3