Polluter Corp.

In: Business and Management

Submitted By sadeq50
Words 611
Pages 3
Case 11-1
Polluter Corp.
Polluter Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States. The Company manufactures various household cleaning products at each facility, which are sold to retail customers. The U.S. government granted the Company emission allowances (EAs) of varying vintage years (i.e., the years in which the allowance may be used) to be used between 2010 and 2030. Upon receipt of the EAs, the Company recorded the EAs as intangible assets with a cost basis of zero, in accordance with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) accounting guidance for EAs. The Company has a fiscal year end of December 31.
As background, in an effort to control or reduce the emission of pollutants and greenhouse gases, governing bodies typically issue rights or EAs to entities to emit a specified level of pollutants. Each individual EA has a vintage year designation. EAs with the same vintage year designation are fungible and can be used by any party to satisfy pollution control obligations. Entities can choose to buy EAs from, and sell EAs to, other entities. Such transactions are typically initiated through a broker. At the end of a compliance period, participating entities are required to either (1) deliver to the governing bodies EAs sufficient to offset the entity's actual emissions or (2) pay a fine.
The Company currently emits a significant amount of greenhouse gases because of its antiquated manufacturing facilities. The Company plans to upgrade its facilities in 2014, which will decrease greenhouse gas emissions to a very low level. On the basis of the timing of the upgrade, the Company currently anticipates a need for additional EAs in fiscal years 2010–2014. However, upon completion of the upgrade, the Company believes it will have excess EAs in fiscal years subsequent to 2014 because…...

Similar Documents

Polluter Corp. Emission Allowance

...Background: An emission allowance is an authorization by a permitting authority or the Environmental Protection Agency Administrator to emit a specified amount of pollutant during a specified period of time. (http://www.ferc.gov/help/faqs/form-580.asp#question4) Case Summary: Polluter Corp. is a company features in manufacturing household cleaning products. The government allocated the emission allowances (EAs) for each year. According to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission accounting guidance for EAs, the EAs is recorded as intangible asssets. The Polluter Corp. is going to upgrade its facilities in 2014 in order to decrease the amount of greenhouse gas emitted. However, the corporation still needs additional EAs before upgrades. Hence, the Company spent $3 million to purchase EAs with a vintage year of 2012 from Clean Air Corp. In order to compensate the cost, the Corp sold EAs worthy of $2 million with the vintage year of 2016 to Dirty Chemical Corp. We need to analyze the classification of the statement of cash flows for these two transactions. In addition, we need to differentiate the method of recording these two transactions according to IFRS and U.S. GAAP. Case Analysis: In terms of classification, emission allowances satisfy the definition of an intangible asset. Specifically, they are assets (not including financial assets) that lack physical substance. [FASB, Appendix F, Glossary to SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets]. Although they......

Words: 681 - Pages: 3

Polluter Corp. Case

...Polluter Corp. Case Study Polluter Corporation is a manufacturing firm in the United States registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Polluter Corp. operates three facilities manufacturing various household cleaning products. These products produced are sold to retail customers. The United States government funded their company with emission allowances (EAs). An emission allowance is an authorization to emit a fixed amount of a pollutant. An emissions allowance is sometimes also referred to as a permit. An allowance is a fully marketable commodity that may be bought, sold, or traded for use by entities covered by the program. The government granted those EAs with varying vintage years which is the number of years the allowance may be used. Polluter Corp. EAs were to be used between 2010 and 2030 which is substantial time. Once the company received their receipt they record the EAs as intangible assets with a cost basis of zero, in accordance with The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). FERC is accounting guidance for EAs so companies understand rules and regulations associated with the allowance. Governing bodies generally issue rights to help control or reduce the emission of pollutants and greenhouse gases. They also allow entities to emit a specified level of pollutants. EAs individually have vintage year designation, but EAs with the same vintage year destination are replaceable and can be replaced by another identical......

Words: 806 - Pages: 4

Polluter Corp

...Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC All Rights Reserved. Case 11-1 Polluter Corp. Polluter Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States. The Company manufactures various household cleaning products at each facility, which are sold to retail customers. The U.S. government granted the Company emission allowances (“EAs”) of varying vintage years (i.e., the years in which the allowance may be used) to be used between 2010 and 2030. Upon receipt of the EAs, the Company recorded the EAs as intangible assets with a cost basis of zero, in accordance with The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) accounting guidance for EAs. The Company has a fiscal year end of December 31. As background, in an effort to control or reduce the emission of pollutants and greenhouse gases, governing bodies typically issue rights or EAs to entities to emit a specified level of pollutants. Each individual EA has a vintage year designation. EAs with the same vintage year designation are fungible and can be used by any party to satisfy pollution control obligations. Entities can choose to buy EAs from, and sell EAs to, other entities. Such transactions are typically initiated through a broker. At the end of a compliance period, participating entities are required to either (1) deliver to the governing bodies EAs sufficient to offset the entity's actual emissions or (2) pay a fine. The Company......

Words: 603 - Pages: 3

Case 11 1 Polluter Corp

... integrated   into  the  conclusion;   leaves  some  work  to   the  reader;  offers   some  unsupported   conclusions   Analysis  is  superficial;   treats  some  issues  as   “given”  when  a   challenging  analysis  is   required;  arguments   are  not  well   supported;  arguments   are  one-­‐sided  and  do   not  address   alternatives   Some  conclusions   follow  from  the   analysis,  but  not   clearly;  conclusions   are  “hedged”  with  new   issues  or  alternatives   not  previously   discussed   Total   50   Case 11-1 Polluter Corp. Polluter Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States. The Company manufactures various household cleaning products at each facility, which are sold to retail customers. The U.S. government granted the Company emission allowances (“EAs”) of varying vintage years (i.e., the years in which the allowance may be used) to be used between 2010 and 2030. Upon receipt of the EAs, the Company recorded the EAs as intangible assets with a cost basis of zero, in accordance with The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) accounting guidance for EAs. The Company has a fiscal year end of December 31. As background, in an effort to control or reduce the emission of pollutants and......

Words: 1306 - Pages: 6

Polluter Corp.

...olluter Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States. The Company manufactures various household cleaning products at each facility, which are sold to retail customers. The U.S. government granted the Company emission allowances (“EAs”) of varying vintage years (i.e., the years in which the allowance may be used) to be used between 2010 and 2030. Upon receipt of the EAs, the Company recorded the EAs as intangible assets with a cost basis of zero, in accordance with The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) accounting guidance for EAs. The Company has a fiscal year end of December 31. As background, in an effort to control or reduce the emission of pollutants and greenhouse gases, governing bodies typically issue rights or EAs to entities to emit a specified level of pollutants. Each individual EA has a vintage year designation. EAs with the same vintage year designation are fungible and can be used by any party to satisfy pollution control obligations. Entities can choose to buy EAs from, and sell EAs to, other entities. Such transactions are typically initiated through a broker. At the end of a compliance period, participating entities are required to either (1) deliver to the governing bodies EAs sufficient to offset the entity's actual emissions or (2) pay a fine. The Company currently emits a significant amount of greenhouse gases because of its antiquated manufacturing facilities. The Company plans to......

Words: 494 - Pages: 2

Polluter Corp

...Trueblood Case 2 Polluter Corp. Polluter Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States. The Company manufactures various household cleaning products at each facility, which are sold to retail customers. The U.S. government granted the Company emission allowances (“EAs”) of varying vintage years (i.e., the years in which the allowance may be used) to be used between 2010 and 2030. Upon receipt of the EAs, the Company recorded the EAs as intangible assets with a cost basis of zero, in accordance with The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) accounting guidance for EAs. The Company has a fiscal year end of December 31. As background, in an effort to control or reduce the emission of pollutants and greenhouse gases, governing bodies typically issue rights or EAs to entities to emit a specified level of pollutants. Each individual EA has a vintage year designation. EAs with the same vintage year designation are fungible and can be used by any party to satisfy pollution control obligations. Entities can choose to buy EAs from, and sell EAs to, other entities. Such transactions are typically initiated through a broker. At the end of a compliance period, participating entities are required to either (1) deliver to the governing bodies EAs sufficient to offset the entity's actual emissions or (2) pay a fine. The Company currently emits a significant amount of greenhouse gases because of its antiquated......

Words: 588 - Pages: 3

Polluter Corp

...Case 11-1 Polluter Corp. Polluter Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States. The Company manufactures various household cleaning products at each facility, which are sold to retail customers. The U.S. government granted the Company emission allowances (EAs) of varying vintage years (i.e., the years in which the allowance may be used) to be used between 2010 and 2030. Upon receipt of the EAs, the Company recorded the EAs as intangible assets with a cost basis of zero, in accordance with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) accounting guidance for EAs. The Company has a fiscal year end of December 31. As background, in an effort to control or reduce the emission of pollutants and greenhouse gases, governing bodies typically issue rights or EAs to entities to emit a specified level of pollutants. Each individual EA has a vintage year designation. EAs with the same vintage year designation are fungible and can be used by any party to satisfy pollution control obligations. Entities can choose to buy EAs from, and sell EAs to, other entities. Such transactions are typically initiated through a broker. At the end of a compliance period, participating entities are required to either (1) deliver to the governing bodies EAs sufficient to offset the entity's actual emissions or (2) pay a fine. The Company currently emits a significant amount of greenhouse gases because of its antiquated manufacturing facilities....

Words: 603 - Pages: 3

Polluter Corp.

...Case 11-1 Polluter Corp. Polluter Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States. The Company manufactures various household cleaning products at each facility, which are sold to retail customers. The U.S. government granted the Company emission allowances (EAs) of varying vintage years (i.e., the years in which the allowance may be used) to be used between 2010 and 2030. Upon receipt of the EAs, the Company recorded the EAs as intangible assets with a cost basis of zero, in accordance with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) accounting guidance for EAs. The Company has a fiscal year end of December 31. As background, in an effort to control or reduce the emission of pollutants and greenhouse gases, governing bodies typically issue rights or EAs to entities to emit a specified level of pollutants. Each individual EA has a vintage year designation. EAs with the same vintage year designation are fungible and can be used by any party to satisfy pollution control obligations. Entities can choose to buy EAs from, and sell EAs to, other entities. Such transactions are typically initiated through a broker. At the end of a compliance period, participating entities are required to either (1) deliver to the governing bodies EAs sufficient to offset the entity's actual emissions or (2) pay a fine. The Company currently emits a significant amount of greenhouse gases because of its antiquated......

Words: 611 - Pages: 3

Polluter

...MEMORANDUM Polluter Corp operates three manufacturing facilities in which various household cleaning products are manufactured and sold to retail stores. Polluter has a certain emission allowances for each year that are classified as intangible assets. Because it anticipates a need for additional emission allowances for the years 2010 – 2014, it purchased $3 million in emissions credits from Clean Air Corp. on April 2, 2010. A complete renovation of its facilities will be completed by 2014, at which point in time Polluter expects to have additional emission allowance that it does not need. Therefore, to offset the cost of having to purchase emissions credits until the renovations are complete, Polluter sold $2 million worth of future emissions credits to Dirty Chemical Corp. The question of how to account for these transactions in the statement of cash flows has been raised. This memo discusses and evaluates the relevant options. Definitions Accounting Standards Codification 230-10 Statement of Cash Flows 230-10-20   Glossary Financing Activities Financing activities include obtaining resources from owners and providing them with a return on, and a return of, their investment; receiving restricted resources that by donor stipulation must be used for long-term purposes; borrowing money and repaying amounts borrowed, or otherwise settling the obligation; and obtaining and paying for other resources obtained from creditors on long-term credit. Investing......

Words: 2793 - Pages: 12

Polluter

...Name Instructor Course Date Case 11-1…..Polluter Corp. For decades, the scientific community has closely studied and debated the environmental, economic, and health effects of greenhouse emissions. Greenhouse emissions are emitted to the environment, majorly affecting the atmosphere, as by product of fossil fuel consumption and by product waste disposal. The Environmental Protection Agency states that carbon dioxide makes 85% of green house emissions (Lehmann 317). The ability of greenhouse gases trapping the sun’s heat is suspected to cause global warming by scientists. A number of strategies are being used in solving the issue, differing from country to country. Some countries, in America, have adopted accounting principles that are aimed at curbing greenhouse emission. The major companies that are responsible for high green house gas emission are granted emission allowances of varying usage years. The emission allowances lay a cap on the amount of green house gas emitted by a company within the vintage year (Kollmuss & Lazarus 131). Emission allowances are fungible, and, therefore, entities may transact them; entities may chose to sell or buy emission allowances from other entities. The transactions are guided by accounting principles set governing bodies such as FERC and U.S GAAP. The paper examines the case study of Polluter Corp in relation to fundamental accounting principles that are essential in emission allowances policies. The......

Words: 1225 - Pages: 5

Case 11-1: Polluter Corp.

...Case 11-1: Polluter Corp. Page 1 Suggested Solution -- Case 01 Objectives of the Case This case gives students an opportunity to apply cash flow principles to determine the appropriate classification of various transactions in the statement of cash flows. Applicable Professional Pronouncements ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows (ASC 230) IAS 7, Statement of Cash Flows (IAS 7) Discussion 1 — Purchase of 2012 Emission Allowances What is the appropriate classification in the statement of cash flows in Polluter Corp.’s (the ―Company’s‖) December 31, 2010, financial statements for its purchase of 2012 emission allowances (―EAs‖) from Clean Air Corp.? Accounting Alternatives — Purchase of 2012 Emission Allowances Alternative 1 — The Company should classify the purchase of the 2012 EAs from Clean Air Corp. as an investing cash outflow in its December 31, 2010, statement of cash flows. Proponents of Alternative 1 believe the Company should classify the purchase of EAs as investing activities in the statement of cash flows given the Company’s election to classify the EAs as intangible assets on its balance sheet. Although EAs are not specifically mentioned in ASC 230, proponents of Alternative 1 believe, given the Company’s accounting policy, the EAs represent ―productive assets.‖ ASC 230-10-20 defines investing activities as follows: Investing activities include making and collecting loans and acquiring and disposing of debt or equity instruments and property, plant, and......

Words: 2701 - Pages: 11

Case 11-1: Polluter Corp.

...Suggested Solution -- Case 01 Objectives of the Case This case gives students an opportunity to apply cash flow principles to determine the appropriate classification of various transactions in the statement of cash flows. Applicable Professional Pronouncements ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows (ASC 230) IAS 7, Statement of Cash Flows (IAS 7) Discussion 1 — Purchase of 2012 Emission Allowances What is the appropriate classification in the statement of cash flows in Polluter Corp.’s (the ―Company’s‖) December 31, 2010, financial statements for its purchase of 2012 emission allowances (―EAs‖) from Clean Air Corp.? Accounting Alternatives — Purchase of 2012 Emission Allowances Alternative 1 — The Company should classify the purchase of the 2012 EAs from Clean Air Corp. as an investing cash outflow in its December 31, 2010, statement of cash flows. Proponents of Alternative 1 believe the Company should classify the purchase of EAs as investing activities in the statement of cash flows given the Company’s election to classify the EAs as intangible assets on its balance sheet. Although EAs are not specifically mentioned in ASC 230, proponents of Alternative 1 believe, given the Company’s accounting policy, the EAs represent ―productive assets.‖ ASC 230-10-20 defines investing activities as follows: Investing activities include making and collecting loans and acquiring and disposing of debt or equity instruments and property, plant, and equipment and other productive assets, that is,...

Words: 305 - Pages: 2

Polluter

...Case 11-1…..Polluter Corp. For decades, the scientific community has closely studied and debated the environmental, economic, and health effects of greenhouse emissions. Greenhouse emissions are emitted to the environment, majorly affecting the atmosphere, as by product of fossil fuel consumption and by product waste disposal. The Environmental Protection Agency states that carbon dioxide makes 85% of green house emissions (Lehmann 317). The ability of greenhouse gases trapping the sun’s heat is suspected to cause global warming by scientists. A number of strategies are being used in solving the issue, differing from country to country. Some countries, in America, have adopted accounting principles that are aimed at curbing greenhouse emission. The major companies that are responsible for high green house gas emission are granted emission allowances of varying usage years. The emission allowances lay a cap on the amount of green house gas emitted by a company within the vintage year (Kollmuss & Lazarus 131). Emission allowances are fungible, and, therefore, entities may transact them; entities may chose to sell or buy emission allowances from other entities. The transactions are guided by accounting principles set governing bodies such as FERC and U.S GAAP. The paper examines the case study of Polluter Corp in relation to fundamental accounting principles that are essential in emission allowances policies. The paper also examines the reporting style......

Words: 1146 - Pages: 5

Case11-1 Polluter Corp

...Case 11-1 Polluter Corp. Polluter Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States. The Company manufactures various household cleaning products at each facility, which are sold to retail customers. The U.S. government granted the Company emission allowances (“EAs”) of varying vintage years (i.e., the years in which the allowance may be used) to be used between 2010 and 2030. Upon receipt of the EAs, the Company recorded the EAs as intangible assets with a cost basis of zero, in accordance with The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) accounting guidance for EAs. The Company has a fiscal year end of December 31. As background, in an effort to control or reduce the emission of pollutants and greenhouse gases, governing bodies typically issue rights or EAs to entities to emit a specified level of pollutants. Each individual EA has a vintage year designation. EAs with the same vintage year designation are fungible and can be used by any party to satisfy pollution control obligations. Entities can choose to buy EAs from, and sell EAs to, other entities. Such transactions are typically initiated through a broker. At the end of a compliance period, participating entities are required to either (1) deliver to the governing bodies EAs sufficient to offset the entity's actual emissions or (2) pay a fine. The Company currently emits a significant amount of greenhouse gases because of its antiquated manufacturing......

Words: 491 - Pages: 2

Polluter Case

...equivalents are Treasury bills, commercial paper, money market funds, and federal funds sold (for an entity with banking operations). Suggested Solution -- Case 01 Objectives of the Case This case gives students an opportunity to apply cash flow principles to determine the appropriate classification of various transactions in the statement of cash flows. Applicable Professional Pronouncements ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows (ASC 230) IAS 7, Statement of Cash Flows (IAS 7) Discussion 1 — Purchase of 2012 Emission Allowances What is the appropriate classification in the statement of cash flows in Polluter Corp.’s (the ―Company’s‖) December 31, 2010, financial statements for its purchase of 2012 emission allowances (―EAs‖) from Clean Air Corp.? Accounting Alternatives — Purchase of 2012 Emission Allowances Alternative 1 — The Company should classify the purchase of the 2012 EAs from Clean Air Corp. as an investing cash outflow in its December 31, 2010, statement of cash flows. Proponents of Alternative 1 believe the Company should classify the purchase of EAs as investing activities in the statement of cash flows given the Company’s election to classify the EAs as intangible assets on its balance sheet. Although EAs are not specifically mentioned in ASC 230, proponents of Alternative 1 believe, given the Company’s accounting policy, the EAs represent ―productive assets.‖ ASC 230-10-20 defines investing activities as follows: Investing activities include making and collecting......

Words: 763 - Pages: 4