Power and Legitimacy

In: Social Issues

Submitted By ayma95
Words 1795
Pages 8
Introduction to political science
1) In political terms, power can be explained as the control one entity has over the other. Power is sometimes confused with the term 'influence'. Where power is the ability of make formal binding decisions, influence can be taken as a means through which that power is exerted. This may be due to intimidation, threats, logical reasoning, rational persuasion or lobbying.
Authority can be defined as a form of power. The difference lies within the ways through both power and authority is exerted. Where power is viewed as control through any means, authority has a moral character attached to it, and is based on a 'right to rule' notion, where the ruled see the authority as legitimate and take it as a moral obligation to obey it. Authority is essential for the ruling governments. They can maintain order in the society by sheer use of force and coercion but stability and peace can only be achieved through willing compliance otherwise chaos would follow. However, authority by some, is also viewed as an idea which threatens the notions of liberty and democracy.
The idea of Authority and Power can be distinguished in theory. Authority is followed without any means, as it is seen as a moral obligation by the ruled party however power is exerted through either persuasion or force. But in the practical terms both of these terms overlap and it is difficult to distinguish them both. An authority will not be influential unless it is backed by power. A leader is said to be in authority when he has the support of his followers who follow him blindly but that authority is backed up by the power the leader holds by rewarding them through promotion and punishing them by firing them. Same is the case with power. There has to be some form of authority for power to be influential.
Example of an authority can be a government rules and regulations where…...

Similar Documents

The Fruits of Legitimacy

...is by taking actions that provide them with legitimacy in the eyes of stakeholders. new ventures can gain legitimacy by creating associations with more established entities, either external or internal to the firm. Article Review: This article is written by Raghunath Singh Rao, Rajesh K. Chandy, & Jaideep C. Prabhu.In this study, the role of a variety of legitimizing actions have been highlighted and empirically tested. In order to legitimize the new ventures in the eyes of the stakeholders different actions can to undertaken.It has also been shown that these legitimizing actions may not always work together. Among internal means of gaining legitimacy, four types of actions has been proposed: historical, scientific, market, and locational. Actions associated with historical legitimacy convey to stakeholders information about the new ventures’ past business performance.It can be shown if the new ventures have successfully launched other products in the past.Actions associated with scientific legitimacy convey to stakeholders that the new ventures in question have the technological capabilities needed to operate in their industry successfully.This can be achieved by recruiting scientists on their board. Actions associated with market legitimacy convey to stakeholders that the new ventures in question have the market-based capabilities needed to operate in their industry effectively New ventures may achieve this type of legitimacy by, for example, placing on their boards......

Words: 691 - Pages: 3

American Institutional Legitimacy

...American Institutional Legitimacy: The Stock Market and Beyond The Stock Market is something our culture sees as a jack pot but when they lose people see it as the worst thing ever invented. Jonathan is one of the people who sees it as a jackpot and is able to see that it can be more than just that. What Jonathan was trying to legitimate was the pump and dump system. It is where someone buys something for a ridiculously low amount and then sells it at a very high price. For example how amusement parks buy water bottles for a low price and sell it for $3 to $5 just because they can. Some people, like the SEC, might see it as a scam. Well the way he made a lot of money was that he would buy stock from companies that were not recognized by a lot of people so their stock value was under $5 thus he would buy it. Then he would go to chat rooms or Yahoo Finance and tell his predictions about how the company is going to sky rocket in the next days and how the price for the stock will increase. So then these people would go and buy stock and his predictions were actually coming true and the value of the stock rose. While that happened he sold out his stock for the highest price and he ended up making The SEC on the other hand were trying to make what Jonathan did into a federal crime. They claimed that only professionals should be allowed to give out information about the stock market. This lead to conflict with Jonathan since he was only a 16th year old boy and was not considered...

Words: 607 - Pages: 3

Power, Authority and Legitimacy

...balance of: Power, authority and legitimacy. These three concepts are interrelated and a society in absence of one or the other usually finds itself in strain from political instability. In the following essay the question “how do Plato, John Locke and Nicollo Machiavelli address the concepts of: power, authority and legitimacy” shall be discussed. Reference shall be made on how each theorist addresses the above concepts. John Locke addresses the concept of legitimacy. He agrees with Thomas Hobbes in that “the British monarchy lost some of its authority” (John 1689), but he believed it came about because “the monarchy had tried to exceed the scope of its authority” (John 1689).Locke believes the people were acting `natural’ by being disruptive because the monarchy broke the `contract’ by wanting absolute power. Thomas Hobbes agrees with Locke in that the monarchy “suffered from a failure of authority” (Thomas 1651.part 1) but he believes it came about because the monarchy was careless and didn’t know what was expected from them as a ruler. Plato also addresses legitimacy in the Greek government. Plato believes that we live in a world of illusions and that the Greek citizens executed themselves when they executed Socrates. Plato tells us illusions can be dangerous “allegory of the cave” (Spragens 1997). Machiavelli deals with power and “believes a good state, is a state that is well ruled” (Machiavelli 1513 chapter12) He believes that unrest is caused by the lust for......

Words: 307 - Pages: 2


...Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics Ian Hurd What motivates states to follow international norms, rules, and commitments? All social systems must confrontwhat we might call the problem of social control—that is, how to get actors to comply with society’s rules—but the problem is particularly acute for international relations, because the international social system does not possess an overarching center of political power to enforce rules. Yet, taken in bal- ance with other values, a measure of order is a valued good. Some take this absence of centralizedpower tomean thattheinternationalsystemis likea Hobbesianstateof nature,where onlymaterialpowermatters;otherssee it as evidencethatinternational rules haveforce onlywhen theyare in theself-interestof each state.I show thatthese two conclusionsare prematurebecauseof theirshallowreadingof internationalsoci- ety and misinterpretationof the ways in which authorityworks in domesticsociety. Consider three generic reasons why an actor might obey a rule: (1) because the actor fears the punishmentof rule enforcers, (2) because the actor sees the rule as in its own self-interest,and (3) becausetheactorfeels therule is legitimateand oughtto be obeyed. The trait distinguishingthe superior from the subordinate is different in each case. In the￿rst, it is asymmetry of physicalcapacity;in thesecond,a particular distributionof incentives;and in the third, a normative structure of status and legiti- macy.In......

Words: 256 - Pages: 2

The Legitimacy of Islam in Pakistan

...the sentiment that the National Congress Party was not ideally representing the views of Indian Muslims. The idea behind the foundation of AIML, as such, was to provide Muslims in India with a representative political body and also to further Muslim interests in India. This was time and again reiterated by countless leaders of AIML in their speeches and writings. Initially, AIML’s actions were heavily based upon this line of thought. However, the AIML’s action with regards to Muslim representation started to change by the late 1920s. The first action by AIML that grew criticism and reflected that its interest were not the benefit of the Muslim community was the Lucknow Pact of 1916. The issue was that the Lucknow Pact called for more powers to be vested by Indians themselves and British to lose their control on the Greater India. This was, however, not in the best interests of Muslims as the Indian government contained a majority of Hindus and this meant in due time a rule of Hindu-majority government would lead to oppression of Muslims. Despite having knowledge of all this, Jinnah himself was the primary architect behind the pact. Instead of acting in favor of Muslims en masse, AIML started to become an organization that furthered the collective interests of a few elitists in the Indian Muslim community. Progressively, since the 1920s this can be seen in various political actions and legislative support that AIML took specifically to benefit a few rather than whole Muslim...

Words: 3884 - Pages: 16


...Q2: There are a variety of definitions of power. Using these definitions analyse and discuss how you observe power being exercised in the world as you experience it. The term “power” has a number of different meanings and definitions relating to all aspects of life. In Kenneth E. Boulding’s book “The Three Faces of Power” he writes, “The various forms of power act and interact on each other so significantly that if the study of power were confined to a single aspect of it, … , much would be lost in the understanding of the over dynamics of the system.” Boulding broadly defines power as the ability of people to get that which they desire. In the context of politics; power concerns all social activities at each level of society. In a sense; politics is power i.e. “The ability to achieve a desired outcome, through whatever means” (Haywood, 2002). Politics can be seen as the fight for scarce resources, and the power lies in the ability to conduct and control this struggle. However power must not be confused with “force”, a much narrower concept, as this is “linked to the concept of domination, which, indeed is only a small part of the general nature of power”(Boulding, 1990). In this essay I am going to discuss some of the different definitions and aspects of power, referring mainly to the “Faces” of power, and giving examples of my observations of different types of power being exercised in the world today. The idea of power is key to the understanding of politics for “...

Words: 1580 - Pages: 7

Power and Authority

...2ND SUBJECT: - SOCIOLOGY TITLE OF THE PROJECT: - POWER AND AUTHORITY RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: - The researcher will have a doctrinal approach towards the Project. Information for the Project will be collected from Books, Journals and Internet. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This Project couldn’t have been successfully completed without the support and guidance of our Sociology Professor, M. Lakshmipati Raju Sir and we would like to express our immense gratitude to him for his constant support and motivation that has encouraged us to come up with this project. Lastly, we would like to thank our classmates for their whole hearted support at all times during the course of the Project. Thanking You Rahul Kr. Dubey CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………..4 2. WHAT IS POWER?.......................................................................................................5 A. THE EMERGENCE OF POWER…………………………………………6 B. THE DIVISION OF POWER……………………………………………..9 3. WHAT IS AUTHORITY…...…………………………………………………………9 A. POLITICAL AUTHORITY……...………………………………………11 4. THE DEMOCRATIC CONCEPTION OF POLITICAL AUTHORITY………..….15 5. THE RELATIONSHIP AND DISTINCTION BETWEEN POWER AND AUTHORITY…………………..................................

Words: 9038 - Pages: 37

The Legitimacy of the Offer of the Davidic Kingdom

...THE MASTER’S SEMINARY THE LEGITIMACY OF THE OFFER OF THE DAVIDIC KINGDOM A PAPER SUBMITTED TO DOCTOR LARRY PETTEGREW IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COURSE TH706 THEOLOGY III BY ROGER DALEY SUN VALLEY, CA APRIL 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION WHAT IS THE KINGDOM 3 THE NATURE OF THE KINGDOM 5 THE MESSAGE OF CHRIST 6 REPENT FOR THE KINGDOM OF GOD IS AT HAND 9 PROPHECY DECLARES THE SUFFERING MESSAIH 12 SUMMARY 15 The Legitimacy of the Offer of the Davidic Kingdom In the gospel of John the Lord Jesus Christ is talking to Nicodemus. “And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life.”(3:14-15, NKJ). This conversation occurred before Jesus had even begun His public ministry. Jesus was telling Nicodemus that the Messiah was to be crucified. Also Nicodemus must believe in Him, if he would have eternal life. Jesus also refers to being born again in order to see the kingdom of God. He also equates believing in Christ and eternal life and all four of these terms (kingdom of God, eternal life, born again, believing) are used in a very short passage referring to the same question, “how can a man be born again?” Essentially, Christ is equating eternal life with entering the kingdom of God...

Words: 5227 - Pages: 21

Power, Authority and Legitimacy

...politics Power gets used to implement a decision. The role of Power becomes most effective when Power does not remain a source of coercion. In-fact after getting legitimized it becomes Authority. Means the stability of Authority depends upon legitimacy. So in short Authority is a quality or capacity of a person, institution, rule or order which becomes important in defining whether Authority is correct or authentic, so that people can follow the rules and regulation without any hesitation. Because of the use of Authority official Governmental policies, rules and regulations get accepted in the society. Authority has two main components: Power and Legitimacy. Legitimacy of a rule or a decision signifies the fact that people reckon the decision as fruitful and in welfare of the society. Thus they are always ready to follow the rule or decision. Demonstration of Power does not become necessary as long as Legitimacy is attached to Power. It only comes out as a symbol. Like a judge with his black gown or a policeman with his uniform. Just like beauty lies in the eyes of beholder, Legitimacy lies in the eyes of beholder. There is no question, that without Power it will be very difficult to implement the official decision as well as rules, but only by the fear of punishment or by the coercion authority may not prove successful as far as long term benefits are concerned. Infact such a step becomes tyranny and works as a catalyst for the rebellion. The able use of Power always......

Words: 307 - Pages: 2


...20 The Bases of Social Power JOHN R. P. FRENCH, JR., AND BERTRAM RAVEN The processes of power are pervasive, complex, and often disguised in our society. Accordingly one finds in political science, in sociology, and in social psychology a variety of distinctions among different types of social power or among qualitatively different processes of social influence (1, 7, 14, 20, 23, 29, 30, 38, 40). Our main purpose is to identify the major types of power and to define them systematically so that we may compare them according to the changes which they produce and the other effects which accompany the use of power. The phenomena of power and influence involve a dyadic relation between two agents which may be viewed from two points of view: (o) What determines the behavior of the agent who exerts power? (h) What determines the reactions of the recipient of this behavior? We take this second point of view and formulate our theory in terms of the life space of P, the person upon whom the power is exerted. In this way we hope to define basic concepts of power which will be adequate to explain many of the phenomena of social influence, including some which have been described in other less genotypic terms. Recent empirical work, especially on small groups, has demonstrated the necessity of distinguishing different types of power in order to account for the different effects found In studies of social influence. Yet there is no doubt that more empirical knowledge......

Words: 7974 - Pages: 32

Soft Power

...Most people already know what the definition of hard power is as such it can be made optional or compulsory. However, in a world dominated by information rather than imitation, there are more ingredients that mark important roles in managing and winning international awareness. The changing nature of power by Joseph S. Nye is an article emphasizing the changing role in the political view and how to take advantage in the new century in which old-fashioned political are not helpful. In the new era, leaders need to have both soft and hard power, including attractiveness, legitimacy and credibility, to be ahead in international affairs. In this article, the author defines power in international settings. In defining power, one cannot measure without knowing the background of the behavior of others. In the modern era, technology has changed the dimension of international power. The traditional authentic politics of the military and economic power have been converted into cyber-dimension based on technology. It has both positive and negative aspects, but it helps spreading nationalism. This trend marks a changing point of view of the role of traditional power. Internet communication has shaped both political dialogues and civilization conflicts. Therefore, countries have to reconsider the power of technology as the changing shift in the interaction between soft and hard power. In defining power, I accept humorously that power is just like love: easier to experience than to define...

Words: 2033 - Pages: 9


...Power and Influence in the Workplace The Meaning of Power * Power is the capacity of a person, team or org to influence others * Not the act of changing someone’s attitudes or behaviors * Based on the target perception that the power holder controls * Involves the asymmetric dependence * Depends on some minimum level of trust * Trust indicates a level of expectation that the more powerful party will deliver the resource Sources of Power in Organizations * Legitimate Power * An agreement in orgs that people of certain roles can request a set of behaviors from others * Manager telling an employee what tasks to perform * Restrictions * Range in which power can be asked * Zone indifference (set of behaviors that individuals are willing to engage in at the other person’s request * Employees have this power over their bosses and coworkers through legal and administrative rights and informal norms * Norm of reciprocity: feeling of obligation to help someone who has helped them; informal rule of conduct we are expected to follow * Information Control: potent form of legitimate power * Information is a resource and those who need it depend on the gate keeper * Gate keepers gain power by selectively distributing information * Reward Power * A person’s ability to control the allocation of rewards valued by other to remove negative......

Words: 1425 - Pages: 6


...n one of the few in-depth treatments of power in conflict situations, Hubert M. Blalock begins by acknowledging something most of us know but rarely state: "The concept of power is both exceedingly slippery to pin down and yet indispensable in enabling one to analyze...."[1] Having defined power, as in physics, as having both potential and kinetic forms, he opts for the latter usage alone in his text. That is, he acknowledges power as both the capacity of an individual or group to accomplish something, and the actual doing of something, but he limits his discussion to "actions actually accomplished." Additional insights into understanding power are offered by Beyond Intractability project participants. This has two advantages. First, it dovetails with how most of us think about power most of the time. Second, it is easier to quantify. It is much easier to measure something that has occurred than something that is a possibility. An actual occurrence is a fact that can be checked. There may be disagreement on the sources of its occurrence, but the argument about its occurrence is likely to be short-lived if adequate facts can be brought to bear. If one side has won in a disagreement (in that it has gotten the other to do something it wanted), we have prima facie evidence that the first is more powerful -- or at least has exerted more power -- than the second. Since concerns of relative power are important in conflicts, it is helpful to have a clear picture of who......

Words: 2563 - Pages: 11

Organisational Legitimacy, Capacity and Capacity Development

...Reflection Organisational legitimacy, capacity and capacity development Mobilising against hunger and for life: An analysis of Derick W. Brinkerhoff capacity and change in a Brazilian network John Saxby Pretoria, South Africa Discussion paper No 58A June 2005 European Centre for Development Policy Management Centre européen de gestion des politiques de développement Study of Capacity, Change and Performance Notes on the methodology The lack of capacity in low-income countries is one of the main constraints to achieving the Millennium Development Goals. Even practitioners confess to having only a limited understanding of how capacity actually develops. In 2002, the chair of Govnet, the Network on Governance and Capacity Development of the OECD, asked the European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) in Maastricht, the Netherlands to undertake a study of how organisations and systems, mainly in developing countries, have succeeded in building their capacity and improving performance. The resulting study focuses on the endogenous process of capacity development - the process of change from the perspective of those undergoing the change. The study examines the factors that encourage it, how it differs from one context to another, and why efforts to develop capacity have been more successful in some contexts than in others. The study consists of about 20 field cases carried out according to a methodological framework with seven components, as......

Words: 10927 - Pages: 44


...The definition of Power as found in the Webster dictionary is said to be- to have possession or control over others; to have political or national strength. Although the theme of power is displayed throughout the plays of Macbeth, Richard III, and the Movie The Final Days, the use of power throughout the three were used and displayed in different ways. Power was used for good and bad. It was also used in different ways for different reasons to get different things done. In the play Macbeth, there are these witches that predict that Macbeth will be made thane of Cawdor and later King of Scotland. They also predict that Macbeth’s companion; heirs would later be crown king. Macbeth was captivated by what the witches told him about becoming King that he did not know what to expect or what he would do when the prediction was to become true, showing that he would not know once he grasp the power of Kingship. Couple nights later Macbeth went to go and have dinner with Duncan castle. Macbeth tells the wife of the prediction of witches about him being king and the wife takes it into her hands to try getting the crown for her husband. Lady Macbeth tells Macbeth to kill Duncan because that is the only way he will become king. She uses her power over her husband and forces him to take action and kill Duncan. When Macbeth arrives at his castle, she persuades him to kill the king that very night. After killing Duncan and the Chamberlin Macbeth receives the crown and becomes King of......

Words: 1890 - Pages: 8