Project Evaluation

In: Business and Management

Submitted By hjn0719
Words 398
Pages 2
S tatement of the Problem How could ServerVault obtain the confidence of investors in order to raise additional capital tosupport its growth and implement its expansion plans? Objectives y

T he group aims to understand and present the burn rate or rate of cash consumptionof the Server Vault company. y

T he group aims to come up with a 2 ½ year forecast for the firms statement of cashflow prepared on a monthly basis which would determine the timing and amount of funds to be sought in the firms capital-raising program. y

T he group aims to present a 30 month financial forecast of Server Vault to be presentedto the private investors in hopes to raise more capital for building new server hostingfaciltities. y

D etermine the operating leverage of the company. y

A nalyze how variable and fixed costs affect operating leverage. y

I dentify the key drivers that could affect the companys operational efficiency and/orfinancial health. A reas of Consideration Financial Forecast y

Capital expenditures . Each new facility would cost 5 to 6$ M US and could hold approximately 5,000 servers depending on the size. o

B y last quarter of September of 2000 , another facility can be opened in D ulles, Virginia. o

Each quarter of 2001 (beginning in January), additional facilities were planned to beadded. o

Existing/current corporate staff could not support the expansion plans. o

A lternative assumption , for the forecast was for Server Vault to build a new facility onlywhen it reached capacity in existing facilities. y

S erver Costs estimated at U S $3 ,000,…...

Similar Documents

Project Evaluation

...Abstract The following report will provide recommendations in regards to three separate project evaluations. Using three different rates for each of the three projects, the net present value, the internal rate of return, and the payback period will be evaluated in each case. It will also offer project selection recommendations for each scenario based on the net present value, as well as project selection recommendations based on the internal rate of return and the payback period. Project Evaluation The following three projects have been broken down and evaluated based on each of the provided scenarios. The net present value, payback period, and internal rate of return are included for each project. Project 1:   | Cash Flows | Year 0 | $ (30,000) | Year 1 | $ 11,000 | Year 2 | $ 11,000 | Year 3 | $ 11,000 | Year 4 | $ 11,000 | Year 5 | $ 11,000 | Scenario 1 – using 5% NPV Rate – Calculations are as follows: -$30,000+ $11,000(1+0.05)1+ $11,000(1+0.05)2+ $11,000(1+0.05)3+ $11,000(1+0.05)4+ $11,000(1+0.05)5 = -$30,000 + $10,476.1905 + $9,977.3243 + $9,502.2136 + $9,049.7272 + $8,618.7878 = $17,624.24 NPV Payback period = 2.727 years IRR = 24.32% Scenario 2 – using 5.5% NPV Rate – Calculations are as follows: -$30,000+ $11,000(1+0.055)1+ $11,000(1+0.055)2+ $11,000(1+0.055)3+ $11,000(1+0.055)4+ $11,000(1+0.055)5 = -$30,000 + $10,426.5403 + $9,882.9766 + $9,367...

Words: 1136 - Pages: 5

Information Technology Evaluation and Implementation - Project Risks

...Information Technology Evaluation and Implementation Project Risks Project risk involves understanding potential problems that might occur on the project and how they might impede project success. According to Fuller et.al (2008), “Project risk is an uncertain event or condition that, if it occurs, has a positive or a negative effect on a project objective.” There are many sources of risk that a project may come upon during the project whether it was foreseen or not. Some of the more common sources of risk are those that often overlooked in most projects; lack of determining the project scope, unforeseen costs estimates, unrealistic timelines, and lack of leadership overview. Risk management is the main solution to protect against risks. The goal of project risk management is to minimize potential risks while maximizing potential opportunities. Risk management can be broken into six categories; Risk management planning, risk identification, qualitative risk analysis, quantitative risk analysis, risk response planning, and risk monitoring and control. * Risk management planning is deciding how to best approach and plan the risk management activities for the project * Risk identification determines which risks are likely to affect a project and documenting their characteristics * Qualitative risk analysis characterizes and analyzes risks and then prioritizes their effects to project objectives * Quantitative risk analysis is measuring......

Words: 321 - Pages: 2

Individual Learing Project 1: Company Analysis and Evaluation Project Instructions

...Individual Learing Project 1: Company Analysis and Evaluation Project Instructions In this project, you will select an organization, or a segment of an organization, and interview key employees for the purpose of gathering information concerning the organization’s critical success factors. Please be sure to inform those interviewed for this project that any proprietary information included in this project will be kept confidential. You will then develop a SWOT analysis to clarify and aid in the identification of the organization's / segment's CSFs. The written project requires you to prepare and submit the following in order: 1. Brief description of the organization/segment–1 paragraph. 2. SWOT analysis in chart form–Four categories - Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats - each item should be clearly and concisely stated. 3. Balanced Scorecard in chart form. Clearly and concisely list CSFs in each of the four categories identified in the text. For each CSF indicate in a separate column explain how the measurement of the CSF will transpire. 4. A discussion of the CSFs chosen for the organization/segment–why were these particular factors selected? Why are they important in accessing the success of the company? (2–3 pages) 5. An evaluation of the organization/segment to determine if it is achieving each of the CSFs. Analyze each CSF and use data from the measures indicated in the balanced scorecard as support for the conclusions. (2–3......

Words: 472 - Pages: 2

Proposing a Project Portfolio Evaluation & Selection Process

...Re: Proposing a Project Portfolio Evaluation and Selection Process Executive Summary Taking into account the poor performance of our current projects due to a weak portfolio management process in place, the Operations SBU has come to the determination that if we are to move forward in accommodating new projects along with our existing ones, the current system must be reviewed and redesigned for better decision-making. This proposal defines a framework for project portfolio evaluation and a project selection for adoption and it elaborates on the two phases that involve project screening, selection, prioritizing and balancing. More emphasis is given to the project selection criteria and score model as this is the main area where the gap of knowledge has been identified. Rationale Our recent organizational determination to sustain by controlling costs and expanding our frontiers shall require much effort from all our SBUs and most importantly, it is crucial that we are able to incubate a proper process that shall boost good decision-making and mitigate conflicts when we come to screening multimillion dollar projects and implementing them as part of our operations. The said process shall be about evaluating our project portfolio and devising a methodology of selecting specific projects with the highest probability of helping our company achieve its strategic goals and fulfill our mission. From the Operations SBU perspective, the implementation of new projects without......

Words: 2454 - Pages: 10

Project Evaluation

...Project Evaluation Section I – Evaluation Theory in General The Minor Adjustment, new vision project is a 10 weeks program that motivates youth to succeed against all odds. In the conclusion of the project the evaluation will take place. The program evaluation is a systematic process of determining whether or not Minor Adjustment new vision project was successful (Babbie, 2007). Program evaluation is so important; it assesses the program’s effectiveness. The purpose of evaluation is to integrate planning, implementation, evaluation and reporting. In addition, the evaluation sees success and learns from it (Babbie, 2007). It also, recognizes failure and provides the opportunity to correct it. The Minor Adjustment, New Vision project evaluation will consist of two different types, formative and summative. Formative evaluation is generally any evaluation that takes place before or during a project’s implementation with the aim of improving the project’s design and performance. A formative evaluation strengthens or improves the program. Formative evaluation often lends itself to qualitative methods of inquiry. The questions asked in formative evaluation are generally more open and lead to exploration of processes, both from the viewpoint of participants, but also from that of project staff and investors (Kettner, Moroney, & Martin, 2008). The use of participatory evaluation is particularly relevant and appropriate to formative evaluation. Formative evaluation......

Words: 1616 - Pages: 7

Hhomeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Project

... | |Daytona State College Cell phone Bomb Threat Seminar | | | Table of Contents Introduction & Background 3 Mission 3 Exercise Design & Evaluation Plan 4 Capabilities 4 Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University 4 Demographics 5 Residential Campus Student Demographics (Fall 2013) 5 Exercise Overview 6 Exercise Design & Development Plan 6 Exercise Needs 6 Exercise Purpose 6 Exercise Scope 7 Exercise Objectives 7 Participants 7 Players 7 Moderator 7 Facilitator 8 Mediators 8 Scenario 8 Initial Scenario 8 Secondary Scenario 12 Exercise Development 13 Exercise Timeline 13 Milestones and Tasks 14 Evaluation Guides (EEGs) 14 Capability 14 Capability Outcome 14 Tasks 15 Public Education & Training 15 HSEEP Compliance 16 Planning & Organization 16 Observation & Data Collection 17 Analyze Data 17 Draft After-Action Report (AAR) 18 After Action Conference 19 Identify Improvements & Implementation 20 Finalize the AAR and IP 20 Track Implementation 20 Recruit/Assign/Train 21 Conclusion & Recommendations 21 Recommendations 23 References 24 Introduction &......

Words: 4022 - Pages: 17

Personal Project and Evaluation Methods

...Assignment: Personal Project and Evaluation Methods Garry R. Scott University of Phoenix AET/ 535 June 28, 2014 Instructor: Stephanie Krebs The fundamentals of Program Evaluation I advocate the principle of evaluation definition that asserts that it is a systematic process that is comprised of a collection of analyzed data enabling us make decisive solid decisions. Because evaluation is a systematic process that contributes to the determination as of what level of objectives has previously been realized, in addition to current objectives students are striving to attain; this idyllically empowers a person to make informed decisions. The process will consequently make certain that the established goals are achieved as required by the programs. It is vital to be aware that evaluations are important since it assists in making vital decisions concerning the impact, effectiveness, or efficiency of a certain program (Boulmetis & Dutwin, 2005). Then again, efficiency asserts that the extent to which a project or program has been productive in accordance to its resources while effectiveness establishes to the degree that particular stipulated objectives have been accomplished. Furthermore, impact refers to the degree to which a project or program has brought about various changes in which either could be advantageous or detrimental. Evaluation is essential in evaluating program implementation, fidelity, resource utilization, and to the value of the......

Words: 1196 - Pages: 5

Evaluation

...Week 2 Assignment: Memorandum Evaluation ENG221 5 March 2015 After reviewing the memorandum, sent by Mr. McCauley, I was baffled. The acronym, “HR”, in the memorandum heading, was not clarified. After reading the second paragraph, it was assumed that it meant “Human Resources”. The acronym, “COO”, was also not explained, for I could only assume that it meant “Chief Operations Officer”, and was not referring to Mr. McCauley’s state of sanity. In the message body, though the memorandum is responding to the Service Request RM004, the service request, even if briefly, was not explained. The disparate tools used were not explained in how they were different, nor did it reveal who used them. The second paragraph, beginning with, “I look forward to moving…,” should have been the last paragraph in concluding the memorandum. The jargon “state-of-the-art” would not be a proper description, in a professional memorandum, of the technology being integrated. A good replacement word, for that phrase, would have been, “advanced”. In the third paragraph of the memorandum body, the tone appears demanding and, within the first sentence, threatening. Though a project plan may be a requirement, it could have been stated in a different format. I would have written the following: “In order for the funding of the integration project can be allocated, a detailed written report will be required containing the following: a list of all the tasks, resources, schedule, and budget requirements.......

Words: 365 - Pages: 2

Evaluation

...Team Name Individual and Peer Evaluation Form Instructions: This evaluation serves to assess your commitment to team efforts and your perspective of the contributions of your teammates to the assignment. It is recommended that the team use this form to reflect upon and improve team performance. Each individual will submit a peer evaluation form into his/her assignment folder. Carefully review the criteria listed on the form and provide honest and constructive responses about your experience with the team assignment. • For each of the criteria, first rate yourself and then each member of your team. • If you assign a score of 5 to yourself or one of your team mates on any of the criteria, you should explain the rating with a specific example of something you or your team mate did to earn the score in the "Explanation" table. The objective is to explain the score in a way that models ideal team behavior. • If you assign a score of less than 3 to yourself or one of your team mates on any of the criteria, you should explain the score with concrete reasons for the lower score in the "Explanation" table. You should include an example that illustrates when, where, and/or how you or a team mate fell short of acceptable performance. Then, provide a brief suggestion as to how the score could be improved. • If you have suggestions as to how to elicit outstanding team behavior from team members or how to avoid team behaviors that may lead to poor team outcomes,......

Words: 624 - Pages: 3

Evaluation

...Evaluation format: * Evaluations will be done four times during the 2 consecutive trimesters [Full Credit course]. * The dates when the scores shall be given are 20th November’15, 11th December ‘15, 24th December’15 & 4th January’16 (tentative date). * The criteria of evaluation for each of the dates are as follows: *   Sr.No | Date of Evaluation | Marks | Criterion for Evaluation |   1. |   20th Nov’15 |   20 |           Student’s initial research was complete & relevant.         Student’s opportunity statement is of an appropriate scope.         Student’s project plan is easy to understand & is of appropriate detail.         Student’s project plan will allow them to successfully complete all tasks before the next training. | 2. | 11th Dec‘15 | 25 |           Students collected relevant, insightful & inspirational information.         Students are able to articulate insights from their research.         Students used a variety of means for collecting information.         Students used a variety of means for recording & communicating information         Students have a broad & deep understanding of their project focus. | 3. | 24th Dec’15 | 20 |           Students identified multiple themes from their insight collections.         Students presented three opportunities.         Students selected themes that are relevant to the original project scope.         Selected themes are ripe / rich for innovation.  | 4. |......

Words: 259 - Pages: 2

Human Genome Project Website Evaluation

...Human Genome Project Website Evaluation We are humans and we all eat. But have you ever wondered what’s in that banana you’re eating? Is it really just a simple banana that grew on a tree? Or is it perhaps something much, much more complex? It’s 2013 and a big debated issue is argued on genetically modification of food and organisms. The Human Genome Project (HGP) helps people understand and identify what exactly genetically modified food and organisms are (GMO). Publications and webpages on this site were created by the U.S. Department of Energy Genome Program's Biological and Environmental Research Information System and all other materials were provided by “third parties” and not created by the U.S. Department of Energy. The Human Genome Project started in 1990, coordinated by the U.S. Department of Energy and National Institutes of Health, and completed their research in 2003. This thirteen-year study was designed for people to understand what genetically modified organisms are. “The project originally was planned to last 15 years, but rapid technological advances accelerated the completion date to 2003” (Human). When one first enters the site, they can see there are many tabs at the top of the page and side margins directing one to other specific research done by HGP. Along the top of the page, the site provides tabs that explain information on a more in-depth description of genes and what exactly is going on in the microbiology essence, for those who wouldn’t......

Words: 1258 - Pages: 6

Ict - Evaluation for Database A2 Project

...Hotel Room Booking Database  Evaluation      I have created a booking system for the hotel which allows the user of the database, notably the  hotel staff, to input all information in regards to a hotel booking, including room information and  customer registration information. This is instead of the paper­based method of booking in, which  the hotel uses at current. I have created the booking database as, after consideration, the hotel  decided it would be a more up­to­date method of booking in and after they had several issues  with loss of data whilst using the paper­based method. Although it still may be the case that data  is occasionally/accidentally lost while using the booking database, this is much more less likely to  happen as back up copies can be made of the data, which were not made when using the  paper­based method as this would be too time consuming for the hotel. I have created a database  with four main parts, which are: Customer, Booking, Booking/Room and Room tables ­ which each  have a connected form. To use the Hotel Room Booking Database, the user should load the  database file from the shortcut on the desktop. Then, a splash screen will be displayed ­ this will  be the first thing that the user sees when the database file is loaded. After this, the user should  click anywhere on the splash screen to display the message box “Hit the OK button to progress to  the login screen”. The user then clicks OK, and then OK on the following mess......

Words: 7101 - Pages: 29

Evaluation

...Introduction The independent evaluation unit of United Nations Development Program (UNDP) conducts county evaluations called Assessment of Development Results (ADRs). This evaluation aims to demonstrate UNDP’s contribution to development results at country level, as well as the effectiveness of UNDP’s strategy in coordinating national effort for achieving development results. Assessment of development results is carried out within general provisions of UNDP Evaluation Policy and conducted jointly with the national government due to principle of national ownership. The main goals of ADR’s are to provide support to UNDP accountability and transparency to the all level of stakeholders and partners in the program country; to assure the quality of UNDP interventions at the country level; and contribute to learning at corporate, regional and country level. In geographical terms, the assessment covers programs and interventions that had impact on the entire national territory or in parts of the territory, such as states or groups of states, and municipalities. The ADR’s is not a sum of project evaluations, but macro-analysis of the relationship between the inputs, the products, and especially the outcomes. The projects and programs targeted at a particular outcome are analyzed in an integrated manner. This study compares four different assessments of development results at country level, which evaluate the UNDP’s strategy, performance and its contribution to development......

Words: 362 - Pages: 2

Evaluation of Planning Projects

...Evaluation of my performance in relation to planning the project Introduction: Planning is a key skill required throughout the life. The purpose of the planning is to find out how the project outcomes will be achieved successfully within both the required quality and timescale. Planning helps to work out the most effective way of reaching your target and prepare to overcome unexpected difficulties in advance. Planning develops the ability to prioritize the tasks. If I did not plan my project I would have not known what tasks I was required to do and what my time limit was, which could have lead ultimately to the failure of the project. The purpose of evaluating my performance in relation to planning is so that I can identify what I did well and what I did not do well. This will help me to carry out better planning in the future I hope that by improving my planning techniques. It will help me in all aspects of my life. Planning techniques used: I used five different techniques to enable me to produce final product. These techniques were action plan, summary action plan, mind maps, Gantt chart and critical path. These are techniques used by professional companies for their planning. The techniques I used were generally effective and helped me to a number of tasks and a final product by the final deadline with required quality. Action plan: To plan my project, first of all I and the other people in the group read the brief and identified the tasks that we would......

Words: 3162 - Pages: 13

Evaluation

...Amity Business School Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida Corporate Resource Centre Summer Intern Evaluation Form for Industry Guide Name of the Intern: _____________________ Enrolment No.: _____________ Roll No.: ____________________ Programme: _________________________ Name & Designation of Industry Guide: _______________________________ Date of Commencement: _____________ Date of Completion: ____________ Project Title: ____________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Company’s Name and Contact Details: _______________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Select one evaluation level for each area by marking a "√" under the level that represents the intern's performance. Part 1: Personal Qualities | Yes (1) | No (0) | Ability of Multitasking | | | Persistence to complete tasks | | | Reliable and dependable | | | Attention to accuracy and detail | | | Ability to cope up with stress | | | Total Marks Obtained in Part 1 = .......

Words: 298 - Pages: 2