The Us Court System

In: Other Topics

Submitted By cdhunt1400
Words 712
Pages 3
The U.S. Court system and Jurisdiction of The Federal Courts, and The State (Ohio) Court System Cassandra Jones PA101 Kaplan University Instructor: Emily Ryan

The U.S. Court system and Jurisdiction of The Federal Courts, and The State (Ohio) Court System

In this paper I will be writing about the organization of the U. S court system. The jurisdiction limits of the federal courts and their requirements for filing in that jurisdiction. I will also talk about the Ohio federal and state court systems and the similarities and differences of how they do their jurisdiction.

The U.S court system is made up of two different types of court systems; the federal and state court. The federal court is also made up of two different types of systems as well. The first federal court is Article III court and the second is the Article I court (United State Courts, 2010).

The Article III court got their name because as stated by the U.S courts “they derive their power from Article III of the Constitution” (United State Courts, 2010). The Article III courts are as followed the U.S District Court, the U.S Circuit Court of Appeal, and the U.S court of International Trade. These court systems judges are appointed by the President of the U.S with advice and consent of the senate and hold office during good behavior(United States Courts, 2010). There are ninety-four districts in the U.S for the U.S District Court, each state has at least one and some states have more depending on the size of that state.

The Article I court system area is as followed by the Magistrate Court, Bankruptcy Court, the U.S Court of Military Appeals, U.S Tax Court, and the U.S Court of Veterans’ Appeal. These types of court systems are established by Congress and usually the judges hold office for about…...

Similar Documents

Court Systems

...Court System Introduction The purpose of this paper is to make the reader aware about the significance of the history of judicial system prevailing within the premises of United States. This paper intends to explore the Court System of United States. The major historical developments in the courts of United States will be discussed. Moreover, the rationale of the dual court system of the United States will be outlined. This paper will also explore the correlation between the historical developments and the dual court system of the United States. Discussion The development of the state courts within United States can be traced back from the colonial period. Every state in United States organizes its court system independently. Every state has been provided with the right to choose its own organizational structures and the possible jurisdictions of their respective courts. Various types of courts have been developed throughout the history of United States. The federal level states have trial courts normally called district courts and circuit courts which are the appellate tribunals. In New York most of the trial courts are considered supreme courts (Columbia Encyclopedia, 2007). The development of court system started in the colonial period. Local judges were called magistrates on the lowest level of their colonial judiciary. By the early eighteenth century, the development of formal courts started. After the American Revolution in 1775, distrust towards the......

Words: 1195 - Pages: 5

Us Court Systems

...The U.S. Court Systems Gabriella Robinson February 21, 2012 U.S. Court System 1 Throughout this paper, I will explain the organization and functions of the federal courts, describe the jurisdiction of the federal courts as well as what filing needs to be done within the court system. I will also be naming several different court levels as well as listing similarities and differences throughout each courtroom. Within the federal court system there are 3 organized divisions. First, there is the Supreme Court which is said to be the “highest court in the land”. Second, the U.S. Court of Appeals and last but not least, the U.S. District Courts. The federal courts hear cases that involve the laws that concern the Constitution, the laws and/or treaties of the U.S., Ambassadors and Public Ministers, disputes between two or more states and bankruptcy cases. The federal courts only exercise judicial powers, meaning the “courts decide controversies by issuing decisions in each case and the rationale for that decision”. Another exception to the rule is diversity of citizenship, which means that in such a case the Diversity of citizenship occurs if the lawsuit involves (a) citizens of different states, (b) a citizen of a state and a citizen or subject of a foreign country, and (c) a citizen of a state and a foreign country is the plaintiff. A corporation is considered to be a citizen of the state in which it is incorporated and in which it has its principal place of......

Words: 884 - Pages: 4

Juvenile Court System

...Juvenile Court System Felicia Simmons CJS/200 10/13/2012 Monty H, Mathis M.Ed Juvenile Court The juvenile court system takes into different consideration when it comes to juveniles. They look at the age of the juvenile as well as the nature of the offense or crime that has been committed. Although the nature of the offense or crime will not ensure that the juvenile will be charged as an adult. In the juvenile court system when a minor commits a crime they are referred to as delinquent not criminals. Juveniles are not arrest they taken into custody and also in court a juvenile case can have adjustment made so that the minor may be sent home or placed in a detention facility, or a child care shelter. At this point the juvenile will be a findings hearing or adjudication hearing. If the juvenile is sentenced they can be sentenced from a range of different things such as commitment to a youth center, treatment, training schools. Before the juvenile is released they might be moved to a residential childcare facility or an aftercare facility. Adult Court System In the adult court system age isn’t a big factor at all, but the courts do look at pass offense as well as any other background or criminal history. Adults are refereed as criminal and they may chose to plead guilty, not guilty or no contest to any charges that they may be facing. An adult offender that is in the due process stage will either be sent to jail or they get a reduction in the charges that they......

Words: 1112 - Pages: 5

Court Systems

...The U.S. Federal Court system I have chosen the United States Federal Court System as my topic of research. I believe the U.S Federal Court System is paramount to our criminal justice system. Today the Federal Court System is a complex structure of courts and actors working together in an imperfect process to deliver justice. Throughout the years there’s been controversy and debate between the rights of state and federal courts. However, as the dual process evolved they became dependent on each other. Without one or the other, the system will not function properly. The Federal Courts have been a controversial issue since the 18th century. The two landmark decisions that are well known are the Article III of the U.S Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789. Weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation in the past was thought to be the absence of a national supreme court to enforce federal law and resolve conflicts and issues between different states. The major issue during the Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 was that there be a separate court system for federal and state. This divided the people into two groups, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists were advocates of state’s rights and feared a strong national government that would result in the weakening of individual liberties. The Federalists on the other hand distrusted the states and favored a strong national government. This conflict between the two groups was later resolved at......

Words: 2828 - Pages: 12

History of the Criminal Court System

...History of the U.S. Criminal Court System CJA/491 Amy Miller 5-27-2013 Professor Angela Bradrick Introduction This paper will examine the historic development of the American courts. It will define common law heritage and discuss the evolution of American law. It will also discuss, compare, and contrast the evolution of the United States courts, including state vs. federal, and trial vs. appellate courts. Common Law Heritage and the Evolution of American Law Back in the time of medieval England, common law heritage was established.  Because of the unwritten laws of this time, judges used customs and societal norms to determine what laws were sufficient for what crimes.  These were considered judge made laws.  Judges would decide cases by using past rulings and sentencing to determine current similar cases; this was called stare decisis (Meyer & Grant, 2003).  It was important for judges to use this procedure, making it a less difficult to prosecute each case independently.  According to Meyer and Grant (2003), common law was un-codified, meaning these were unwritten laws.  As stated earlier, judges used previous verdicts to identify what forms of prosecution and sentencing of law-breaking acts would be implemented in current cases.  Codified laws, or written laws were also defined by pre-existing customs, but they were written statutes in which society could familiarize with and recognize as a law.  The changes came about, when the common laws were......

Words: 1086 - Pages: 5

Court System

...United States and Mexico Court Systems “Court system the judiciary also known as the judicial system or judicature is the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in the name of the sovereign or state” ( Freedman, 2000). The judiciary provides a mechanism for the resolution of disputes. Purposes and responsibilities of courts require balance between external and internal accountability. Courts do not serve their enduring purposes or continuing responsibilities unless their structure, governance, operations, programs, processes, and performance lead to the reality and deserved public perception that the judiciary is accountable. The courts’ responsibility for the proper use of public money is to ensure rule of law, equal protection and due process, individual justice in individual cases, and the appearance of individual justice in individual cases. In the United States, judicial branches of the federal and state governments are charged with the application and interpretation of the law. The U.S. court system is divided into two administratively separate systems: the federal and the state. Each of these systems are independent of the executive and legislative branches of government. Such a dual court system is a heritage of the colonial period. “By the time the U.S. Constitution had first mandated The Judiciary Act of 1789 the establishment of a federal judiciary, each of the original Thirteen Colonies already had its own comprehensive court system based on the......

Words: 1226 - Pages: 5

The Us Courts

...historical developments of the U.S. courts began in the colonial days. Since then the American courts have taken their own path, and have evolved in order to better suit the social needs of today’s America. Presently, there are two judicial systems. The first one is the state and local courts established under the authority of state governments. The second is the Federal courts system created by Congress under the authority of the U.S. Constitution. Development of the American Courts The origins and foundations of American courts like other social, legal and cultural habits in America descended from Great Britain. The court system in American colonies resolved civil and criminal disputes. However, the court systems within each colony were not exactly the same. The Massachusetts Bay Colony had a General Court that created laws, conducted trials and imposed sentences. Later, county courts were created and the General Court was used for appeal hearings and for some cases that involved serious crimes. The colony in Pennsylvania allowed offenders to be their own lawyers and to plead their cases to a justice of the peace. Ultimately all American colonies had functioning court systems but they were not uniform. After the American Revolution, colonial court systems became state courts; and like colonial court systems, state courts were not uniform. Appellate jurisdiction which is the lawful authority of a court to review a decision made by a lower court existed however, there......

Words: 1430 - Pages: 6

Historical Development of the Us Courts System

...Historical Development of the U.S. Court System Denise Willaims CJS/200 The United States has a dual court system that consists of state courts that primarily hear civil and criminal cases related to state laws and federal courts that primarily hear civil and criminal cases related to federal laws. The U.S. Constitution designed the federal and state governments to share power. Both courts were put into place to seek to resolve legal disputes and promote justice whether it be to protect your civil rights or to protect your personal property. The American court system is rated one of the highest in the world in comparison to other countries. It prestigious qualities ranks it higher than almost any other country in the world. The United States seems to hold a higher regard for human life that of our surrounding countries. Most of the crimes in the United States are not crimes that are punishable by death, whereas what the United States considers a misdemeanor, could be punishable by death in another country. In the United States, we also get a fair trial which you are represented by a lawyer who is paid to act in your best interest. In other countries, you may not get a lawyer, or even a trial for the crimes you are accused of committing. Most countries depend upon statutes or written law. It includes laws formally put into play by parliaments or......

Words: 275 - Pages: 2

Development of the Us Court System

...Image of the Nursing Profession The first impression one has on a subject or issue can change the rest of his life. That is the case that happened to me prompting me to pursue a career in nursing which I do not regret. So it happened that at the age of nine years, we had a neighbor who had recurrent asthma attacks and not having a means of transport they could come to our place and request our father to drive them to the nearest medical center. I used to go since the car had ample space. Throughout the visits I came to admire the role of the nurses, how they could take the sick neighbor who was struggling to breathe and assure us that she will be well in a while. And so I decided that when I grow up I want to impact a change onto the lives of people by playing a similar role. It feels great when one handles a patient and see him/her recovering. The first image that I had of a nurse changed my whole life. I perceived a nurse to be a person who had the power to give people the hope of life. Someone who could avert the situation when it seemed a person was at the blink of death. Over the years, this image has not changed. Though I have been introduced to more concepts that I didn’t know when I was making the choice I feel that the first image was correct. Nurses play a great role in the society and I am glad for the change I have impacted as I do my practice. Many people are influenced different and they have different perceptions towards nursing as a profession and the...

Words: 623 - Pages: 3

Court Systems

...the court system within the U.S. and the jurisdiction of the federal courts, also alternatives to litigations. State court system includes Limited-Jurisdiction which may or may not be recorded into record and may be limited by subject and amount. General-Jurisdiction, which hears evidence, testimony and renders a decision. May have separate divisions that handle civil and criminal matters and recorded into record. Some states may have an Intermediate Appellate Court which hears appeals from lower level courts. No new evidence is introduced at this level. Then there is the court of last resort which is the Highest State Court also known in some states as the State Supreme Court. This court hears appeals from appellate courts at an intermediate level. Also have the final decision unless there is a conflict in constitutional or statuary rights. Even though all states have a federal court system; most legal disputes can be handled in state courts for example: probates and wills, small claims, divorce, child custody, etc. Federal Court System includes the following: Special Federal Court which includes courts that have specialized or limited jurisdiction such as Tax court, Claims court, Court of International Trade, and Bankruptcy courts. U.S. District Courts which is the trial court and has 96 districts with at least one in every state. U.S. Courts of Appeals which are the intermediate appellate courts. U.S. Supreme Court which is the highest court of the federal court system.......

Words: 605 - Pages: 3

Court Systems

...What is Crime? Celestina Toro Criminal Justice System What is Crime? The criminal justice system is used for the purpose to determine how we can think about behaviors of other human beings and how we can use laws to control and fix behaviors of others that commit crimes. To be more thoroughly of crime, these are acts and behaviors people do and get punished by law for doing the crime they did. Crime can be defined as a conduct in violation of criminal laws of federal and state government of a local jurisdiction for which there’s no legally accept excuse for the crime that was committed. There are five different goals of the criminal justice. The five goals are deterrence, incapacitation, retribution, rehabilitation and restoration. The first goal deterrence is the criminal justice goal that inhibits criminal behavior through fear of punishment. As for this goal, there are two types of deterrence, specific deterrence and general deterrence. Specific deterrence is when a person is caught punished and decides that they will no longer engage in criminal activities because they know the consequences. General deterrence is when the offender is caught and the punishment is observed other. As for these offenders, don’t commit criminal behaviors to avoid punishment. The goal incapacitation involves removing the offender’s ability to commit crime. What incapacitation means is to incarcerate the person. By incarcerating a person helps keep the dangerous offender off the streets......

Words: 1065 - Pages: 5

An Interview Within Court Systems

...interview within court systems 504 8/31/2015 William Miller An interview within court systems The interview will discuss, with one of the United States Supreme Court judges named Tom C. Clark. The case that it will be about is the Miranda V. Arizona case, which took place in February through March within 1966 the ruling, came out in June of 1966. In the ruling of the case of the case a five to four vote, which the decision went to Miranda v. Arizona in the case (Hendrie, Edward M, 1997). Q. the origins of where this case located Justice Tom C. Clark. The case of Miranda V. Arizona located, within the city and state of Phoenix Arizona the person name Ernesto A. Miranda. That came in this area as an Immigrant from his native country arrested and accused of sexual assault and kidnapping, which they took Miranda in for questing. They held in questing for almost two hours, which made him confessed to the criminal act to the officers. However when in questing is Amendments was violated the fifth and sixth that is the person has a right to keep their selves from incriminating his or herself also they have a right to legal representation. Once they had the confession, they go to court in which the confession used by the prosecutor as evidence with other items. Because of this, the ruling did not go in his favor, and he was to 20-30 years behind bars (Hendrie, Edward M, 1997). Q. Have it been any cases are like this which considered in the Supreme......

Words: 1439 - Pages: 6

Judges in the Us Court System

...figures in the court room, and in the criminal justice system. Judges make decisions that affect the lives of many, yet many judges do not have any legal training and have never been lawyers. When it comes to the issue of whether or not judges should be elected or appointed, it becomes very political. Appointed judges seem to be favored among a certain political party and are appointed based on the fact that they will serve the courts based on the beliefs of the political party that appointed them. One theory that supports judges being appointed is “Twenty-four states have used merit selection to pick judges for decades, so that judges can be screened for experience, intellect and judicial temperament, and not face a tidal wave of special-interest money seeking to tilt the scales of justice. Research shows that elected judges are disciplined at higher rates, and for more serious infractions, than are their appointed counterparts ("Why judges should,”)”. The election of a judge may introduce conflicts of interest during trials, however, elected judges will be held accountable to the public. I believe an appointed judge is the higher road to take. They may not always have legal training, but they are known within the judicial system. It also removes the issues with election money and accusations of “being bought”. There has also been research that supports my opinion that appointed judges are the best fit for the court systems. “State supreme court......

Words: 436 - Pages: 2

Court System

...INTRODUCTION In the United States, there are two separate court systems: State and Federal. The two court systems were made to keep State and Federal matters separate. Under the State court, legislatures were able to generate a variety of laws. The following will review on how the two different systems came, and how the systems relate to today. Two branches are equally important, and the following is going to mention about how both the State and Federal Courts interact with one another. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF STATE COURTS A State court will differ from all 50 states. If one were to look at the capitols of each state, there of course is a state court in each one. All were made at different times, therefore making each state different from one another. At the start of the 13 colonies, the head of the state was not voted on (as voting was not created yet), but merely decided upon by the king. However, the three key branches of the court system were not decided yet since the governor had control and power. At the first level of the courts, which is called a magistrate (Schmalleger, 2009)? The head of the colony is the person who decides who fills this position. Following was the majority of trial cases. Lastly was the third court level, having a case that the courts appeal, with the head of the state and the members that he had chosen were the ones that heard the case which the Grand Jury was brought in at this time (Carp & Stidham, 2001). As centuries...

Words: 1144 - Pages: 5

Court System Paper

...Court System Paper Teresa Wilson CJA 204 Dec. 5, 2011 Mrs. Dorey Court System Paper The court systems have been around for hundreds of years. Our court system has come a very long way since then. I mean back then our first court was actually back in the 1789 which was small and hierarchy compared to the was courts are now days. In the 1789 the first bill was put into action. From this we got what is called “the original American court system for resolving criminal and civil dispute.”( Schmalleger, 2009. Our state courts have developed several models. They have followed the Federal Judiciary Act of 1789, which later became the reorganization Act of 1801, which has made more models for the state courts. They follow the federal model development three-tiered structure. They are 1.) Trial courts of limited jurisdiction, 2.) Trial courts of general jurisdiction and 3.) Appellate courts. It was soon found that the three-tiered models were not that great. It did provide local and specialized courts proliferated. Traffic courts, magistrates courts, and probate courts, just to name a few, that functioned at a lower levels. The (ABA) better known as the American Bar Association and even the American Judicator Society. Helped the simplification of state court structures, they also help the state form the models. Among the state courts there are different levels of courts, they are the state trial courts that criminal cases begin. In the trail courts......

Words: 1094 - Pages: 5