Whistleblowing & Sarbanes-Oxley

In: Business and Management

Submitted By nicole9109
Words 907
Pages 4
Introduction According to the text, whistleblowers are people who decided to report unethical or illegal activities, usually activities under the control of their employers (Halbert). They disclose information within or outside their organizations, for instances, management or the public. Robert Blatchford decided to come forward with allegations of J. C. Penney was charging full price for items that were on sale and collecting sales tax on items that were nontaxable. He was terminated and had a lawsuit filed against for coming forward with the information.
What is Whistleblowing? Whistleblowing is the attempt of people who work for a company reveal unethical or illegal activities. Whistleblowing tries to make others aware of activities that are considered illegal and unethical. When the wrongdoing is reported to someone within the company, it is considered to internal. However, internal whistleblowing is tends to less effective to the company. On the other hand, there is external whistleblowing. This is where the wrongdoing is made public by going to the media. Therefore, going public tends to be more effective and cause the company bad publicity. Whistleblowing can be personal or impersonal. Personal is when the wrongful act affects the whistleblower alone. Impersonal is when wrongful act affects others. Many people whistle blow for two reasons: morality and revenge. Morality is the biggest and best reason for this act because people generally should want to be moral and ethical. Whistleblowers should keep in mind that once they blow the whistle there are consequences, such as termination, blacklisted and lawsuits. A few individuals are strong enough to blow the whistle. Whereas, many people would not because of fear. In this case, Robert Blatchford, the whistleblower was terminated for going public about J.C. Penney charging full price for items that were…...

Similar Documents

Sarbanes-Oxley

...Effects Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 On Financial Statements ACC/291 10/07/12 It’s inevitable for a company to have down periods when they are not making a profit and sometimes even spending more than they are bringing in. Companies that are publically traded are governed and sanctioned more than sole proprietorships (SP) and Limited Liability Companies (LLC). When the company is a sole proprietorship or a limited liability company government and regulations are basically reviewed and enforced internally. That’s a privileged that these types of organizations have. Owners may sometime not handle finances appropriately or may not have checks and balances in place from any outside sources to make sure everything is handled correctly. Organizations of any other sort than SP’s and LLC’s are under the scrutiny of The Sarbanes Oxley Act. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was basically established to deal with unethical behavior and corporate social responsibility issues. This law was established to enforce accounting auditing and to protect investors. Companies like Enron and WorldCom scandals made it imperative for Congress to pass such a law to protect Investors, Corporation Employees, etc. This Act was not favored by a lot of organizations. Companies had to create procedures to meet what SOX require and it’s compliance. Procedures were required to be established to enforce the checks and......

Words: 432 - Pages: 2

Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Due

...Whistleblowing And Sarbanes-Oxley Due LEG500 Professor Doris Mitchell Sileen Wright July 20, 2014 What is a whistle-blower? A whistle-blowing can be an employee or an ex-employee of a corporation who have evidence of dishonesty and/or corrupt behavior in the organization or behavior in the organization that is not in the best interest of the public. (Fernando, 365). The characteristics of a whistleblower is a person who is devoted to the concerns of others, they are useful to others, they are not concern in changing their behavior, they allow their on belief and attitudes to guide them and they are very educated people who hold professional positions. While whistle-blowing can be rewarding it can also be harmful for the person who is the whistle-blower and the organization, so one must be very careful in becoming a whistle-blower. For instance, the effects of being a whistle-blower can be strenuous both physical as well as mentally, it can cause the organization as well as the person to lose money and their reputations can be destroy as well, they are chances that someone could be incarcerated, the whistleblower can also be force to leave their job or the can be demoted, the credibility of the whistle-blower as well as the organization can be ruined, and the family of the whistle blower can be put jeopardy. So, when do you think an employee should be a whistle-blower and report misconduct by someone in their company? To some being a whistle-blower is being disloyal...

Words: 768 - Pages: 4

Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley

...Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Tina-Marie Cole Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance LEG 500 - Lecture Course Prof. Lisa M. Morris January 20, 2015 Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Trinity Industries, or TRN (NYSE), manufactures roadway guardrails, which are a highway public safety feature. In 2005, TRN changed its rail head design saving the company two dollars per rail head but failed to notify the Federal Highway Administration which is required by a federal ruling. The newly designed rail heads that TRN has installed on U.S. roads nationally do not propel the guardrails away from crashing vehicles in head on collisions. The lower cost railheads can send the guard rail slicing through a car potentially injuring passengers unlike there predecessors design that pushed the rail away from the wreck and oncoming traffic. The new railheads known as the ET-Plus model failed five crash tests which were also undisclosed to authorities. Joshua Harman, a competitor to TRN discovered the changed design had gone unreported and sued TRN on behalf of the federal government (Davis & Polcyn, 2014). Joshua Harman stands to make one third of a potentially billion dollars in his law suit (Ivory & Kessler, 2014). As a whistleblower, Joshua Harman is saving potential lives and injuries, fighting back at corporate greed and earning a fortune in the process. A whistleblower exposes all forms of alleged misconduct on behalf of an organization which......

Words: 1278 - Pages: 6

Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Due

...Introduction Whistleblowing refers to disclosure of suspected wrongdoing at work by a worker. All workers have the right and the capability to report inappropriate actions such as illegal transactions and operations or neglect of duties among others. The Sarbanes-Oxley due is a policy that sets the standards for the United States public company offices especially the boards, management and public accounting organizations. The paper describes a whistleblower and provides an example of a whistleblower case. The paper also analyzes the whistleblowers actions according to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As stated earlier a whistleblower is the individual that tells of an inappropriate action or operation in the organization. Whistleblowers have the following characteristics. Whistleblowers are never interested in changing their behavior or characteristics (Near& Miceli, 1995). Whistleblowers are normally having an educational background and have professional positions in the workplace. The whistleblower is intelligent as such can think through situations clearly and make concise decisions (Near& Miceli, 1985). They are pragmatic and will deal with situations in realistic ways rather than theoretical considerations. They are self-conscious hence not easily carried away by other people’s beliefs and attitudes. Whistleblowers are morally obligated to help others in the best possible manner. They have a high sense of morality (Near& Miceli, 1985). A former Zillow employee Chris Crocker...

Words: 951 - Pages: 4

Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Act

...Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Act Michelle M. Webb Dr. Boneita Campbell LEG500 Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance April 20, 2015 . Week 3 Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Act Who are Whistleblowers and what do they do? Could you be a Whistleblower? There are several definitions for the term whistleblower. The most accurate and significant definitions to the subject of this paper are the definition given by the Black’s Law Dictionary and the one by the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA). The Black’s Law Dictionary defines a whistleblower as a worker who declines to participate in and informs on the unlawful and/or unjust actions of his co-workers or his employer ("The Law Dictionary", n.d.). The WPA defines whistleblowing as the disclosure of facts an employee deems proof of unlawful acts of, blatant misconduct, exploitation of authority, and could jeopardize public safety (Molzen, 2002). Over the years many U.S. workers have observed unlawful transgressions within the workplace and have come forward to report these actions. The actions of these noble citizens (whistleblowers) have been instrumental in saving enormous amounts of money and countless lives over the years. However, these whistleblowers fail to receive the recognition and admirations they deserve for doing the right thing. More often than not they are badgered, bullied, demoted, and terminated from their jobs for their efforts. Therefore, the act of......

Words: 1070 - Pages: 5

Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley

...Assignment 1 – Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Tialia Booth LEG 500 – Law, Ethics, & Corporate Governance Strayer University Professor Lateefah A. Muhammad July 20, 2015 Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Peter Buxtun.  Linda Almonte. John Kopchinski. Edward Snowden. Everett Stern. J. Kirk McGill.  The commonality in each of the individuals listed is that they have been identified as a whistleblower.  This paper will review the key characteristics of a whistleblower, examine an example of whistleblowing from recent history, provide an opinion on whether or not such whistleblowing was justified by the individual, and finally review the current Sarbanes-Oxley Act to determine to what extent the individual was protected.   A whistleblower can be most basically defined as an individual or persons who report and make known unethical and illegal actions taken by their employer.  The employer could be a publicly traded or privately held company or a not-for-profit organization.  The whistleblower may choose to release their findings and information uncovered within their own company or to outsiders such as the news media, law enforcement officials, or federal regulators.  In every case of a whistleblower coming forward there is a shared desire to stop the unethical and possibly illegal behavior or acts being committed and to ensure those who have been affected are identified and hopefully compensated or righted in some way (Halbert, Ingulli, & Frey, 2015). In 2003...

Words: 1038 - Pages: 5

Sarbanes-Oxley

...More importantly, the size and scope of this scandal and others such as Tyco and Worldcom decreased my faith in the financial market as a whole. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was devised partly due to the Enron scandal. It outlines stricter regulations that are designed to prevent this type of fraud from occurring again. It limits off-balance-sheet transactions and regulates auditor independence and conflict of interest. These are all avenues that allowed Enron and other companies to successfully commit fraud (Economist). References "Andersen guilty in Enron case". BBC News. June 15, 2002. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/2047122.stm. Retrieved September 3, 2015 BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/business/2002/enron/timeline/1.stm. Retrieved September 3, 2015 "Enron scandal brings overdue scrutiny of stock analysts". USA Today. 25 March 2002. "Dan Ackman, "Enron the Incredible"". Forbes.com, Jan. 17, 2002. January 15, 2002. http://www.forbes.com/2002/01/15/0115enron.html. September 3, 2015 “Whistle-blower sent off”. Telegraph.co.uk, Jan. 30, 2002. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/2751205/Whistle-blower-sent-off.html. September 3, 2015 “The Rise and Fall of Enron”. Nytimes.com, http://www.nytimes.com/ref/business/20060201_ENRON_GRAPHIC.html. September 3, 2015 "Five years of Sarbanes–Oxley". The Economist. 2007-07-26. http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9545905. September 3, 2015...

Words: 992 - Pages: 4

Leg500 Week 3 Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley

...type of wrongdoing behavior. Internal whistleblowing mechanisms for public companies must comply with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). Two of the many corporate governance provisions of SOX place whistleblower-friendly requirements on issuers. SOX section 301 requires the audit committee of every issuer to establish procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal control, or auditing matters, and to maintain the anonymity of employee complaints regarding accounting and auditing matters (i.e., the establishment of a whistleblower hotline). SOX section 806 provides protection for employees who blow the whistle against their employer, an anti-retaliation provision subsequently reinforced by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Programs to encourage external whistleblowing typically provide an incentive to the would be whistleblower, either in the form of monetary awards, protection from retaliation, or both. Researchers have identified various issues that are most often associated with whistleblowing Whistleblowing dilemmas can occur when there is a conflict between the expectations of an individual and/or a profession regarding safety and the interests of the organization. Whistleblowing regarding public harm can include concerns about pollution or other forms of environmental harm. Briefly summarize one (1) researched instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded......

Words: 752 - Pages: 4

Leg500 Week 3 Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley

...LEG500 Week 3 Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Click Link Below To Buy: http://hwcampus.com/shop/leg500-week-3-assignment-1-whistleblowing/ Use the Internet or Strayer Library to research instances of whistleblowing in publicly traded companies within the last 12 months. Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you: 1. Describe the key characteristics of a whistleblower, and briefly summarize one (1) researched instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Include the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower’s actions on both the whistleblower himself and the company. 2. Decide whether or not the whistleblower was justified in reporting the company’s actions. Provide a rationale for your response. 3. Examine the extent to which the whistleblower would be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Justify your response. 4. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment.Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name,......

Words: 312 - Pages: 2

Leg Week 3 Assignment 1 Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley

...Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley This document will describe the key characteristics of a whistleblower and briefly summarize on researched instance of Whistleblowing in one publically traded company within the last 12 months. It will include the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower’s actions on both herself and the company. Next, it will evaluate whether or not the whistleblower was justified in reporting the company’s actions. Lastly, it will examine the extent to which the whistleblower would be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Characteristics For many years, individuals have raised concerns about misconduct, unethical or illegal practices observed at their place of employment to reporters/media, employers’ ethics hotline, management, via labor law posters, or the Office of the Whistleblower. This included employees from private companies, non-profit organizations, and governmental agencies. Employees can report unethical actions regarding public safety, health, business practices, fraud, waste, and abuse. Keep in mind that is does not have to be an employee; it can also be a supplier, contractor, client or any individual who somehow becomes aware of the illegal activities. Despite the fact that unethical behavior occurs within the workplace, there are still several employees that are loyal to the law, the community and society as a whole. These people are known as whistleblowers. Publicly Traded......

Words: 842 - Pages: 4

Leg500 Week 3 Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley

...LEG500 Week 3 Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Click Link Below To Buy: http://hwcampus.com/shop/leg500-week-3-assignment-1-whistleblowing/ Use the Internet or Strayer Library to research instances of whistleblowing in publicly traded companies within the last 12 months. Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you: 1. Describe the key characteristics of a whistleblower, and briefly summarize one (1) researched instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Include the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower’s actions on both the whistleblower himself and the company. 2. Decide whether or not the whistleblower was justified in reporting the company’s actions. Provide a rationale for your response. 3. Examine the extent to which the whistleblower would be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Justify your response. 4. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment.Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name,......

Words: 312 - Pages: 2

Sarbanes and Oxley

...Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - SOX The finance industry was not always regulated. Prior to the great stock market crash in October of 1929, there was no regulation. After this crash, Congress held hearings to determine the problems and suggest solutions. This resulted in the Securities Act of 1933. The Security Exchange Commission (SEC) was created as a result of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The intent of this Commission was to restore confidence to investors by requiring honest reporting, and requiring companies and people who work in the industry to put investors’ interests first. After the fall of several publicly traded companies in 2001, it was clear that the SEC alone was not enough. For this reason and through the guidance of U.S. Senator Paul Sarbanes and U.S. Representative Michael Oxley, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in July 2002 (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2013). The mission of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is stated in Public Law 107-204 (2002), “To protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made pursuant to the securities laws, and for other purposes” (p. 1). To determine if the mission of SOX is successful the following will be discussed; the main advantages and disadvantages associated with SOX, the affects SOX has on public company Chief Operating Executive’s (CEO’s) and Chief Financial Executive’s (CFO’s), the impact SOX has on outside independent audit......

Words: 3725 - Pages: 15

Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley

...Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Due Week 3 and worth 100 points Use the Internet or Strayer Library to research instances of whistleblowing in publicly traded companies within the last 12 months. Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you: 1.Describe the key characteristics of a whistleblower, and briefly summarize one (1) researched instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Include the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower’s actions on both the whistleblower himself and the company. 2.Decide whether or not the whistleblower was justified in reporting the company’s actions. Provide a rationale for your response. 3.Examine the extent to which the whistleblower would be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Justify your response. 4.Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: •Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. •Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the......

Words: 301 - Pages: 2

Leg500 Week 3 Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley

...LEG500 Week 3 Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Click Link Below To Buy: http://hwcampus.com/shop/leg500-week-3-assignment-1-whistleblowing/ Use the Internet or Strayer Library to research instances of whistleblowing in publicly traded companies within the last 12 months. Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you: 1. Describe the key characteristics of a whistleblower, and briefly summarize one (1) researched instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Include the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower’s actions on both the whistleblower himself and the company. 2. Decide whether or not the whistleblower was justified in reporting the company’s actions. Provide a rationale for your response. 3. Examine the extent to which the whistleblower would be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Justify your response. 4. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment.Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name,......

Words: 312 - Pages: 2

Sarbanes-Oxley

...What exactly is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? Who does it protect? Who benefits from SOX most? I will discuss what the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is its key components, and its primary objective. Also, I will discuss the criticisms surrounding the SOX act. Why it is important to enforce the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Finally, I will discuss if the SOX has achieved its goals. The main purpose of Sarbanes Oxley Act is to ensure that the corporate sector works with transparency and provides full disclosure of information as and when required (Bing, 2007). This basically means that corporations must keep good records of what goes on in their business, not just for their benefit, but just in case of an audit, then they’ll have all their transactions ready to be reviewed and to keep future corporate scandals down. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed by Congress on July 30, 2002. The law forced public companies to spend much more money having their books thoroughly audited, and it increased the penalties for executives who defrauded investors. Since the bill's passage and implementation, nervous investors who had yanked trillions of dollars from the market have returned (Farrell, 2007). The men behind the Sarbanes-Oxley Act consist of U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, New York Stock Exchange CEO John Thain and former AIG chief Maurice "Hank" Greenberg. Even though their voices my appear to be isolated, Charles Niemeier a member of the Public Company Accounting Oversight......

Words: 2320 - Pages: 10