Williamson Case

In: Business and Management

Submitted By ndel3
Words 5204
Pages 21
A Case Study

The Initial Public Offering of Williams Communications Group, Inc.

William B. Elliott*

Department of Finance
Oklahoma State University
College of Business
224 Business
Stillwater, OK 74078
405.744.8639 (voice)
405.744.5180 (fax) elliowb@okstate.edu Lindsay Lewellen

First Union Securities
Asset Securitization Division
1 First Union Center
301 South College Street
Charolotte, NC 28288-0943
704.383.7991

March 2002

* Corresponding author

We would like to thank Jack McCarthy, Scott Schubert, and Betty Simkins for their valuable comments.

A Case Study

The Initial Public Offering of Williams Communications Group, Inc.

Abstract

The Williams Companies, Inc. has decided to divest a portion of their holdings in Williams Communications Group (WCG), a wholly-owned subsidiary. WCG is a high growth business operating in the telecommunications sector. This case focuses on valuation of a telecommunications company and the process of taking a wholly-owned subsidiary public using an equity carve-out. Students are asked to estimate a value for this offering. This case is most appropriate for undergraduates, however, it could be a used as an introductory case for MBA students.

INTRODUCTION

Mr. Jack McCarthy, Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Senior Vice President of The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB), sat in his corner office overlooking downtown Tulsa and pondered the firm’s upcoming IPO of its Williams Communications Group (WCG). Several weeks earlier, in August 1999, the firm had decided to carve-out 14 percent of WCG. Now the task of valuing the IPO was foremost in Mr. McCarthy’s thoughts. Your summer internship assignment, as an assistant to Salomon Smith Barney’s telecommunications analyst, is to provide Mr. McCarthy with the numbers with which to back up his…...

Similar Documents

Williamson Ether Synthesis

...Williamson Ether Synthesis * Produces unsymmetrical ethers through a nucleophilic substitution reaction (a nucleophile is a species that donates an electron pair to a positively charged species called an electrophile) * Involves an SN2 reaction of an alkoxide ion (which is the conjugate base of an acid – one less hydrogen - and is therefore an organic group bonded to a negatively changed oxygen atom) such as a sodium alkoxide and a primary alkyl halide (chemical compounds derived from alkanes containing one or more halogens – alkanes have only hydrogen and carbon atoms with single bonds and no cyclic structures) * An SN2 reaction is also known as a bimolecular nucleophilic substitution and it is where a lone electron pair from an nucleophile bonds to an electron deficient electrophilic center, causing a group called the “leaving group” to be expelled from the electrophile * The following reaction is the general form of a Williamson Ether Synthesis reaction Alkoxide Alkyl Ether Leaving ion halide group * The alkoxide ion reacts with the substrate (chemical species being observed, reacts with a reagent) which must have a good leaving group * Typically these substrates are alkyl halides, alkyl sulfonates, and dialkyl sulfates * Results in the formation of an ether......

Words: 769 - Pages: 4

Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson

...Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson Dianne M. Dowling Human Resource Project Management Strayer University Dr. Lila Jordan April 26, 2013 Abstract D. D. Williams was founded in 1865 and today is a global leader of non-artificial coloring. They operate in nine (9) facilities in six (6) countries and supplies many of the best-know food and beverage companies. Though time has brought about many changes, the organization finally realized what needed to transpire in order to bring their mission and vision into becoming the outstanding company they are today. With strategic planning and prioritizing, D. D. Williamson has learned what it takes to be successful and what brings positive results (Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler& McAfee, 2012). Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson Prioritizing is the process of translating strategic objectives into operational priorities. It involves deciding which projects or types of projects to do and which not to do. Through prioritizing agencies direct resources, time and energy to projects that are deemed more important and lucrative in achieving the objective of the organization success (Mintzberg, 1994). Strategic planning is an organizational activity that is used to set priorities, focus energy and resources, strengthen operations and ensures that employees and other shareholders are working toward common goals. It is a disciplined effort that produces decisions and actions that......

Words: 1297 - Pages: 6

Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson

...Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson HRM 517 – Managing Human Resource projects Strayer University June 21, 2013 What was the Prioritization Issue at D.D. Williamson? In the case study of D.D. Williamson, it appeared the organization was successful in many ventures, but lacked the ability to manage certain projects. In fact, critical projects that required attention were left to the waste side, and as a result lead to missed opportunities, or resulted in going over the allocated budget. Within the organization of D.D. Williamson, there appeared to have been a breakdown in communication, which blinded the organization in determining projects that needed the most attention. Through the process of the organization’s investigation, which took approximately three years, leaders realized the they had no accurate system in place for marking the level of importance in each of their projects. In researching the writings of Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, and McAffee (2012), D.D. Williamson would have benefited from utilizing a project management team, whom would have identified the scope of the project, cost, and taken ownership of the schedule from start to finish. D.D. Williamson would have benefited from having developed a well-rounded project team, or several teams could have managed each project independently. Furthermore, each team could have managed the project based on the urgency of each project, the cost, and the practical details......

Words: 1197 - Pages: 5

Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson

...Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson Crystal D. Dr. Donny Bagwell Managing Human Resources Projects: HRM 517 October 27, 2013 Introduction D.D. Williamson implemented a new process for project prioritization that included focusing on the vision and impact of projects and narrowing down projects by selecting the ones of high importance and assigning them to senior management teams. I will attempt to critique that process, recommend an improvement for the process, provide a scenario of why the process could possibly not be successful, and project if the process will still be successful in five years. Critiquing D.D. Williamson Project Prioritization The prioritization process at D. D. Williamson is a great improvement opposed to the previous prioritization process that was implemented. I believe that D.D. Williamson was able to finally overcome challenges after years of not having a successful process in place. Cutting down the amount of projects from 60 to 16 was a smart plan that in return helped D.D. Williamson not to go over budget, increase the success rate to over 60 percent of projects finishing close to the expected completion date, and earn better results. This process also helped to move forward the most critical projects of high importance. Simplifying the criteria ratings also helped to narrow down projects and prioritize them. By selecting a new criteria rating and focusing on the Vision Impact Projects (VIPs), it......

Words: 809 - Pages: 4

Prioritizing D.D. Williamson

...1. Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. D.D. Williamson (Williamson) is the world leader in caramel coloring and natural coloring for foods and beverages with global operations on five continents since founded in 1865. Over the years, the company has managed to be successful in many business endeavors, as well as withstanding the test of time by being in existence almost 150 years (DDW, 2013). In this time, Williamson has experienced many difficulties but yet has managed to overcome them all and their problem with prioritizing was no different. In this case study, Williamson had trouble managing projects that were successful, so they took a step back and pinpointed the cause of this issue. They found the cause to be the lack of project prioritization. There were projects of great importance being pushed to the side while meaningless project were being started. As a result of this, projects were gone over budget and there were probability many missed opportunities due to their disorganization. So they took time to devise a plan that would help them better select the projects that were more useful to the organization. The process took about three years to settle on a strategy that would bring success to their critical projects. With management being one of the essential tools needed for project management, Williamson’s first approach was where senior management worked together to select a maximum of two projects per senior sponsor by a set of criteria and......

Words: 1013 - Pages: 5

Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson

...Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson Jessie Bruswick July 18, 2014 Introduction What are the key components that keep a business or company afloat? Most business owners and CEOs would suggest a business plan, budget, qualified and experienced workers, goals for the business, great leadership, and maybe even trial and error. All of these suggestions are sure contributions to the success of any business, but we must not forget prioritizing. This case study will help us to see and understand that D. D. Williamson Company made prioritizing very crucial and necessary in the building, growth, and success of the company. Many companies have all the previously mentioned attributes, but without having a since of priority, the company will soon fail. After realizing some failed projects, D.D. Williamson began taking a closer look at what was really important. Prioritizing allows companies like D.D. Williamson, the opportunity to step back and see what’s important, very important, and least important. With that knowledge, the company can take its best managers or leaders and put them on projects that require more attention, skill, and knowledge, while other sub-projects can be seen after by others with not as much experience. Literature Review Critique the prioritizing process The process previously used by D. D. Williamson Company in 2004, caused a weakness that was two-fold. The company had too many projects that were considered as high importance and the......

Words: 1007 - Pages: 5

Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson

...Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson 2014 October 20 HRM 517/ Professor Stephen Castellese Prioritizing Projects 1 Introduction Keeping any organization above water takes a few key components. These components are not limited to strategic planning, goals, budgeting, qualifications, leadership and loyalty. These components will make for a successful organization as long as they remember to prioritize. A case study has been conducted on the business of D.D. Williamson. The D.D. Williamson Company has not been one to lack success, but has lacked the ability to manage projects. Because of its lacking ability to manage projects they have missed out on opportunities and have exceeded budgets. After reading the case study we see that there has also been a clear breakdown in the communication when dealing with projects assignments. It took nearly three years before investigating and upper level management to figure out that there were no precise systems put into place for marking projects level of importance. Prioritizing is necessary and crucial to an organization for growth, planning, and success. According to Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, and McAffee (2012), D.D. Williamson would have benefited from utilizing a project management team, whom would have identified the scope of the project, cost, and taken ownership of the schedule from start to finish. Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. This company would have benefited......

Words: 1041 - Pages: 5

Williamson (Observations, Insights, Lessons) Oil

...The Effectiveness of Leadership Development Training for Warrant Officer Candidates WOSC-09-07, CW3 Jermain C. Williamson I served as a TAC Officer from July 2006 until February 2008 and as the SR TAC Officer from March 2008 until April 2009 while assigned to the 1st Warrant Officer Company, Warrant Officer Career Center, Ft Rucker, AL. My duties included developing, advising, and coaching Warrant Officer Candidates from 15 branches and over 43 specialty fields; specifically provide leadership and create a positive learning environment which encourages all Candidates to demonstrate their physical, mental, and leadership abilities as they transition from Enlisted to Warrant Officers, supervise, train and coach 20 Warrant Officers serving as TAC Officers, standardize and supervise all Candidate and TAC Officer training, supervise hands on training for National Guard TAC Officers as part of the RTI initiative. Observation 1: Leadership Development training provided by the Warrant Officer Career College for Warrant Officer Candidates has successfully changed to meet the needs of the operational Army. Discussion: The Warrant Officer Career College was challenged by TRADOC to restructure the training that is provided to Warrant Officer Candidates to better prepare them for their role as Officer leaders in the Army. The Commandant, COL Jones took this tasking on with passion and intensity. He immediately started re-looking old and outdated practices of not only......

Words: 879 - Pages: 4

Williamson and Oliver

...Case Nr. 8 – Williamson and Oliver 1. Is Williamson and Oliver committing the “fallacy of hoping for A while rewarding B? I don’t think that Williamson and Oliver is committing the fallacy of hoping for A while rewarding B, but if they fail to manage the new reward system fairly they could easily commit it. The main goal of the new incentive plan is to improve the profitability of the firm and make the right decisions to keep the firm prosper over long-term. As the text describes, all PICs are inexperienced in their role of general managers, lack managerial skills, focus on short-term profits and have not made the psychological transition from a local firm to a local office of a national firm. In short, they are used to thinking as accountants and not as managers. The company should expect PICs to rationally adjust to the rewarding system rather that expect them to change their management style by saying they should do it. Therefore, implementing the new system could help reduce these problems and force PICs to change their management style and focus on long-term planning. Before implementing the new system, the company has to make sure that this system doesn’t espouse long term growth and profitability while rewarding short term results. It has to espouse and reward long term results; otherwise they would be committing the fallacy of hoping for A while rewarding B. Also, the company has to overview the overall system and performance factors and results......

Words: 1294 - Pages: 6

Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson

...Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson Critique the prioritizing process D. D. Williamson. D. D. Williamson is a small privately held company. Founded in 1865 in Louisville, Kentucky, D. D. Williamson has become a global leader in non-artificial colors (Kloppenberg & Nkomo, 2012). The company has grown to nine operating facilities in six countries and supplying many food and beverage companies around the world. D. D. Williamson had too many projects that were all deemed important. Even though the project was ongoing, some projects were late, over budget, and not achieving the predicted results (Kloppenberg & Nkomo, 2012). With so many active and important projects, the company decided to implement a prioritization matrix. The prioritization matrix was an excellent way to prioritize the company’s projects and improve the budget and on-time rates. As of 2009, the company made more changes to their prioritization process. They decided to choose no more than five “Vision Impact Projects” that would get high-level focus and attention (Kloppenberg & Nkomo, 2012). Projects are now receiving more in depth attention. Suggest at least one recommendation to improve the prioritizing process. Although D. D. Williamson has an effective prioritizing process, any method can be improved. The first thing D. D. Williams can do to improve the prioritizing process. Knowing that whatever process that is done the greatest impact will be on the stakeholder......

Words: 771 - Pages: 4

Hrm517 Week 3 Case Study 1 Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson (Chapter 2) Hrm 517 Week 3 Case Study 1 Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson (Chapter 2)

...underway. Develop a brief response to his or her request. HRM517 Week 3 Case Study 1 Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson (Chapter 2) Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson (Chapter 2) Due Week 3 and worth 240 points Read the case titled: “Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson” found in Chapter 2. Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you: ·       Analyze the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. ·       Suggest two (2) recommendations to improve the prioritizing process. ·       Create a scenario where the implemented process at D. D. Williamson would not work. ·       Project five (5) years ahead and speculate whether or not D. D. Williamson will be using the same process. Justify your answer. ·       Use at least four (4) quality (peer-reviewed) resources in this assignment. Your assignment must: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. HRM517 Week 4 Case Study 2: Project Leadership Roles at TriHealth Due Week 4 and worth 240 points Read the case titled: “Project Leadership Roles at TriHealth” found in Chapter......

Words: 2056 - Pages: 9

Hrm517 Week 3 Case Study 1 Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson (Chapter 2) Hrm 517 Week 3 Case Study 1 Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson (Chapter 2)

...gets underway. Develop a brief response to his or her request. HRM517 Week 3 Case Study 1 Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson (Chapter 2) Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson (Chapter 2) Due Week 3 and worth 240 points Read the case titled: “Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson” found in Chapter 2. Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you: * Analyze the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. * Suggest two (2) recommendations to improve the prioritizing process. * Create a scenario where the implemented process at D. D. Williamson would not work. * Project five (5) years ahead and speculate whether or not D. D. Williamson will be using the same process. Justify your answer. * Use at least four (4) quality (peer-reviewed) resources in this assignment. Your assignment must: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. HRM517 Week 4 Case Study 2: Project Leadership Roles at TriHealth Due Week 4 and worth 240 points Read the case titled: “Project Leadership Roles at TriHealth” found in Chapter 3.  This......

Words: 2038 - Pages: 9

Prioritizing at Dd Williamson

...Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson HRM 517 October 23, 2011 Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson This paper will critique the prioritizing process at D.D. Williamson; suggest one recommendation to improve the prioritizing process, a scenario to discuss where the implemented process at D.D. Williamson would not work, and a long term goal of five years from now speculating whether or not D.D. Williamson will be using the same process. D.D. Williamson has nine natural coloring operations on five continents since founded in 1865. With that said, it took D.D. Williamson three years; two iteration to reconcile on an approach that significantly increased the company success rate with critical projects they now call VIP (Vision Impact Projects) (.Kloppenborg, 2012 p 48) D.D. Williamson began its first approach to prioritize the company senior management team, being that it is the company major management support system. With this, the senior management teams would have a limit of two projects per senior management totaling 16 projects. According to D.D. Williamson, the company thought it was a great move ahead because the year before, the senior management teams had been challenge to monitor over 60 improvement projects (Kloppenborg, 2012, p 48). Although the company improved to well over 60 percent, there were still some problems. Some projects were not moving forward as planned and came to be a critical investment for D.D. Williamson. The company......

Words: 1008 - Pages: 5

A Tribute to Oliver Williamson

...A TRIBUTE TO OLIVER WILLIAMSON: Institutions, Politics, and Non-Market Strategy Rui J. P. de Figueiredo, Jr. liver Williamson is best known for his contributions to economics, and particularly to our understanding of how private firms are defined, operate, and change. Williamson’s primary application addressed the question of why some economic transactions were organized within a private firm, while others took place outside of a firm, in the market. Despite this focus, Williamson’s reach and impact has extended far beyond the domain of private firms and markets. Certainly suitable for a scholar who has been so vocally interdisciplinary in his approach to the study of institutions and organizations, Williamson’s work has also made critical contributions to the understanding of political institutions specifically, and politics more generally. O From Transaction Cost Economics to Transaction Cost Politics At its heart, Williamson’s deep analysis of organization through the “lens of contract” is not restricted to private firms competing for economic profits. The theory and empirical analysis outlined and developed by Williamson, and those working through the framework he provides, focus on issues of governance more broadly: how activities, exchanges, or transactions are appropriately (or at times inappropriately) organized to minimize transaction costs. Put another way, one of Williamson’s signal contributions was to note that the way in which social activity is......

Words: 4569 - Pages: 19

D.D. Williamson

...Critique the prioritizing process at D.D. Williamson D.D. Williamson’s prioritizing process started off not good but once they realized their mistakes they were able to sit down and rethink their prioritizing process. As mentioned, “We took three years and two iterations of our prioritization process to finally settle on an approach that dramatically increased our success rate on critical projects (now called VIPs, or “Vision Impact Projects”). ( Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 2012) Even though it took them a minimum of three years they realized their mistakes and were able to overcome their negatives results and turn those results into a negative. Not all projects will be successful or even start off successful, but D.D. Williamson never allowed their unsuccessfulness to prevent them from continuing on with their projects. D.D. Williamson showed enough loyalty to their employees to know that they were overwhelmed on the number of projects they had on the table they “hired a continuous improvement manager to serve as both our project office and a key resource for project facilitation.” ( pg 48) In my opinion, D.D. Williamson showed a high level of professionalism when they brought on additional employees for their company. With that being said they were able to increase their success rate to sixty percent and that was higher than the previous year. Suggest at least one (1) recommendation to improve prioritizing process. hin the 1970s with......

Words: 1229 - Pages: 5